John Deere as corporate punching bag

FriendlySpartan

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2021
9,214
9,666
113
38
Only tangentially related, but one thing I'll point out is if your job can be done from home, then it can be done from India.
If your US based org doesn’t have business in Asia, and your job is outsourced to India then your job was never important to the company to begin with.
 

BCClone

Well Seen Member.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2011
67,166
63,055
113
Not exactly sure.
Thats a good point. I don't really follow the world of accountants. I work in the hard sciences (Degree in Microbiology) so I stick mostly to Pharma, Consumer Care etc.

There are good jobs out there at little guys in those industries. But I remember working for a CC company, they wouldn't even get me to $40k/yr. That was too much for them. Moved to a fortune 500 company and doubled my salary overnight.
Small companies can be a crap shoot. Many times it is reliant on what the owner/s pay themselves and/or other family members. You can get an owner who doesn’t pay himself much but has a lot of “extra” benefits or is creating a valuable company that they can sell off as a retirement plan. They get the idea that they can’t make less or similar to others in the place so they lose all relevance to what fair compensation is.
You can see issues with ESOP programs also. You think it’s great but you either get to shafted on the stock when you leave or you get low increases after vesting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shadow

cowgirl836

Well-Known Member
Sep 3, 2009
50,876
42,182
113
No doubt there is. I should have pursued it. Curious what this particular place is looking for exactly, so I could work that edge a bit.

get as many words from the job posting into your resume as you can. You worked with customers but the posting says clients? Make a swap. You worked with partners and vendors and they are all about their stakeholders? Switch.
 

mustangcy

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
3,899
1,011
113
Bloomfield
Partially agree - depends GREATLY on the industry.

We're in a pricey space, so our folks get paid well. But there's other small biz that grind it out to make a nickel mowing grass and plowing snow, and they just can't pay people much.

edit - Dopey beat me to it.

Hence the problem with talking complex issues on a freaking message board...of course the argument between public and privately held companies is nuanced and is different depending on business. The thread is talking about John Deere, large manufacturing, not private accounting firms and lawn mower services...or ma and pa companies just scraping by.

I'll defend to the core large scale privately held companies as being lightyears better than public...idk man it seems crazy to me that anyone in my world or JD's would even argue this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CascadeClone

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
25,974
23,739
113
Hence the problem with talking complex issues on a freaking message board...of course the argument between public and privately held companies is nuanced and is different depending on business. The thread is talking about John Deere, large manufacturing, not private accounting firms and lawn mower services...or ma and pa companies just scraping by.

I'll defend to the core large scale privately held companies as being lightyears better than public...idk man it seems crazy to me that anyone in my world or JD's would even argue this.

If you can find a privately owned company that has the same pay and benefits as the corporations, then yes you’re probably better off. But, the reason Deere has been able to rehire people is they have great benefits and they’re fairly competitive with pay. You aren’t going to find a better paying option in the Cedar Valley, public or private.

So tonight there will be a lot of conversations among families of whether they will need to move away to find work. That’ll have a domino affect on all sorts of industries beyond Deere.
 

AuH2O

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2013
12,738
20,501
113
I wonder what the rehire rate is for JD. I know that people assume that this approach of layoff and rehire works for them, but it's not like you can really run a controlled experiment on this.

Having lost an employee to one of JDs big contracting hire moves a few years ago, I find it hard to believe this high turnover approach is optimal for them. In this case they paid this guy insane money on contract work. Didn't renew his contract for a year, then offered to renew his contract again. They could've paid him high end of market value and kept him on that entire time for less money. Maybe they didn't anticipate needing to rehire him a year later, but they seem very reactionary to market fluctuations that are inevitable. I have worked for various companies that have been subject to market swings that were pretty wild in construction and never saw workforce swings like JD seems to have all the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SolterraCyclone

shadow

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 11, 2006
1,667
1,451
113
Those are often the ones that run under the radar for protections like FMLA. So certain groups can get really screwed then. See small companies laying off pregnant women all. the. time.
Or their husbands...
 
  • Like
Reactions: cowgirl836

JEFF420

Not on weed
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 6, 2014
1,531
2,101
113
35
Send me a DM if you are affected by recent layoffs. I have a W2 position open today. All I ask is that you show up on time, can pass a drug test, and can comfortably climb a ladder. Sometimes there are early days as well (6 AM when things break)

W2 salary
401K match
company vehicle
Has to live in within a reasonable commute of West Des Moines
drug test?! tf..... company vehicle here... they no longer test for weed
 

shadow

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 11, 2006
1,667
1,451
113
Had a buddy at a JD plant that was running max capacity get let go. Sounds like a spreadsheet decision from HQ without any local input. Lay offs suck but some of these ones don't make sense to me. Feels like they hired McKinsey to fire people; around 2:30 in this clip...

 
Last edited:

2forISU

Well-Known Member
Oct 8, 2008
6,240
2,205
113
If you can find a privately owned company that has the same pay and benefits as the corporations, then yes you’re probably better off. But, the reason Deere has been able to rehire people is they have great benefits and they’re fairly competitive with pay. You aren’t going to find a better paying option in the Cedar Valley, public or private.

So tonight there will be a lot of conversations among families of whether they will need to move away to find work. That’ll have a domino affect on all sorts of industries beyond Deere.
When my parents worked for Deere back in the day their benefits were unreal: healthcare paid for, pension, and you could also tap into 401K starting in the 90's. Over the last 30 years Deere has chipped away at their benefits. As I stated before, it's shell of what it use to be.
 

1SEIACLONE

Well-Known Member
Jun 2, 2024
2,255
2,088
113
63
Ames Iowa
When my parents worked for Deere back in the day their benefits were unreal: healthcare paid for, pension, and you could also tap into 401K starting in the 90's. Over the last 30 years Deere has chipped away at their benefits. As I stated before, it's shell of what it use to be.
True i know a few retired Deere workers, and they were told "put in your 30 years, and never work again." Full family insurance, copays of a dollar or two for the worker on name prescription drugs, full pension plan after your 30 years and generally the last 5 years, they allowed them to take easier jobs. The last year, they were given a 3 wheeled bike and there job was to deliver parts for the line.

Those days are now gone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2forISU

NWICY

Well-Known Member
Sep 2, 2012
34,359
30,422
113
This is nothing new for Deere same happen during farm crisis in the 80's, major head count reduction. Waterloo was impacted big time as it lost roughly 14% of it's population.

The farm crisis was a way different beast, this is corporate greed pure and simple.
 

2forISU

Well-Known Member
Oct 8, 2008
6,240
2,205
113
True i know a few retired Deere workers, and they were told "put in your 30 years, and never work again." Full family insurance, copays of a dollar or two for the worker on name prescription drugs, full pension plan after your 30 years and generally the last 5 years, they allowed them to take easier jobs. The last year, they were given a 3 wheeled bike and there job was to deliver parts for the line.

Those days are now gone.
Absolutely and in return most of those employs were loyal as hell. It's funny you mention the bikes because we had a couple John Deere 2-wheel bikes and I kept those till about 5-years ago until I sold them(antique collectors loved them). Everyone in the state wanted to work for Deere and it was honor to work for them back in the day.
 

2forISU

Well-Known Member
Oct 8, 2008
6,240
2,205
113
The farm crisis was a way different beast, this is corporate greed pure and simple.
I understand there is difference. I'm just saying Deere at that time let workers go because there was downturn in the economy, and it had a massive impact on Waterloo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NWICY

Pope

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Feb 7, 2015
10,128
22,959
113
True i know a few retired Deere workers, and they were told "put in your 30 years, and never work again." Full family insurance, copays of a dollar or two for the worker on name prescription drugs, full pension plan after your 30 years and generally the last 5 years, they allowed them to take easier jobs. The last year, they were given a 3 wheeled bike and there job was to deliver parts for the line.

Those days are now gone.
Yep. Used to be you could graduate from high school, get a job at Deere, and support your entire household on your wages while your wife stayed home and raised the kids. Those days are long gone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1SEIACLONE

NWICY

Well-Known Member
Sep 2, 2012
34,359
30,422
113
This is true, but the flip side is that cost-cutting also reduces costs for consumers. It's like free trade, net-net society is better off, even though some people lose, and even though its hard to see & feel that broad overall impact.

Note I am not defending JD here, what they're doing seems short-sighted to me. Their whole MO seems sub-optimal to me.
In theory consumer cost should go down, I'm guessing your not going to see any price roll backs on any division of JD anytime soon.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron