Job Interview: What questions cause you the most anxiety?

BCClone

Well Seen Member.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2011
67,740
63,810
113
Not exactly sure.
You got the manhole cover one wrong, btw. Well, not exactly wrong, but there's a correct answer, and that's not it

Yeah, I would have had one die count up to six and the other count up the number of 6s. The 5s seem more difficult.

1895 would have been better for where I grew up. Just get on that horse, point the compass south and after about 4 days you will get there.
 

ISUCyclones2015

Doesn't wipe standing up
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 19, 2010
14,651
10,929
113
Chicago, IL
You got the manhole cover one wrong, btw. Well, not exactly wrong, but there's a correct answer, and that's not it

I think the real answer is because it's the only shape that won't fit inside itself so it would never fall in which I knew. I despise that question anyway after Google made it famous. This was for a small IT Dept somewhere and I didn't really care.
 

ISUCyclones2015

Doesn't wipe standing up
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 19, 2010
14,651
10,929
113
Chicago, IL
Yeah, I would have had one die count up to six and the other count up the number of 6s. The 5s seem more difficult.

1895 would have been better for where I grew up. Just get on that horse, point the compass south and after about 4 days you will get there.

Well my thinking was once you got to the one die saying 6, you can "reset". There should never be a die that says 6 in that scenario and I didn't need to count past 31 anyway.

Like I said, there isn't a wrong answer, it's just explaining your thought process and why you came up with the solution.
 

Tailg8er

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2011
7,891
4,743
113
38
Johnston
Yea the wrong part about that is "a few steps up". That tells the interviewer you EXPECT to be promoted consistently while barely doing the time required. Most companies, being promoted 3 times in 5 years is a massive jump. It's fine to be ambitious but keep it more ambiguous. Say something like "I hope to learn and grow in the role and become a leader in <department> among my peers". That leaves the door open to promotion to supervisor, shows ambition but without being arrogant about it.

Yeah, for me there wasn't a wrong part about my answer. If given the chance again, I'd answer exactly the same. The level of position I was in/applying for didn't have much of a jump to get to a supervisor role, so if within 5 years was too ambitious, I didn't want to be there. Probably helped that I could be selective - I was job searching because I wanted the right fit, not cause I needed a job.

As an occasional interviewer in a supervisory role now, I'd MUCH prefer a candidate with <5 year supervisor aspirations themselves as opposed to someone with a canned response or mediocre goals - tells me they have confidence in their abilities & want to grow. If they're good enough to actually do that in our organization, great. If not, best of luck with your next venture.
 

cycloner29

Well-Known Member
Dec 17, 2008
12,857
12,435
113
Ames
"If you were a tree, what kind of tree would you be?"

Has anyone ever actually be asked that?

Nope but a great comeback would be "coniferous or deciduous?" I would answer coniferous as I don't go dormant in the fall/winter.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron