I think what most are saying is if it were a one or the other situation. For instance I would trade the win over ISU for a win over Wisconsin this year in a heartbeat.
Jamie's level of concern pertaining to Iowa
- Thread starter CySmurf
- Start date
I think what most are saying is if it were a one or the other situation. For instance I would trade the win over ISU for a win over Wisconsin this year in a heartbeat.
Remember when you said Luka Garza was a bench player at best for ISU.... good times.
Well, he would be. But that's more because our coaches don't seem to realize that you should start your better players over lesser players (see Jacobsen starting over Condit).
@CyTwins, he mean he really has an eye for talent. Garza is a bench player and Epenesa is irrelevant. LOL.
And this is further confirmed by the peaceful idiot disagreeing.
JP has guided everything but the W/L as good as any athletic director in the country.
Pretty dumb take by Paul. Bumbling Bruce hired one coach in those three sports IIRC and that was Wayne Morgan
Doesn't he have the highest winning % for any ISU coach in their first three seasons? At the time I know he did.
He started well I remember. A lot of that was because he was the head recruiter and Stinson and Blalock threatened to look elsewhere if Morgan wasn’t hired. Having those two come in along with having some quality bigs allows you to get a jump out of the gate.
Fewer coaches hired the better typically for an AD. I mean most AD's don't get a chance to hire a 2nd football coach, somehow Pollard got 3 chances at both football and basketball coaches.
He probably got that opinion from this geneous
Not sure what "recruiting battles" you are referring t
ther than Wieskamp, ISU has not offered anyone on the Iowa Roster in a long time. ISU never offered JorBo, Kriener, Pemsl, either McCaffery, etc. So I guess ISU can take Foster and call it a day.Longer term, it you want to look at winning recruiting battles in Iowa, Roy Williams has owned both schools.
