ISU games on mediacom?

ISUFan22

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
33,922
904
113
Denver, CO
I heard about this yesterday and was waiting for something official on it. Even though I am not a Mediacom subscriber...this is great news. More media exposure for ISU! :)
 

crooksie_26

Well-Known Member
Mar 24, 2006
647
507
93
i don't know

With the game possibly being on media com, i see as bad, because ISU won't get any money from the game like it was on espn or abc, and it could possibly also lower the attendance of the game as fans that were planning on going just for the fact it wasn't on TV, now won't go because it is on TV. I like the game on TV because now i can tape it but for ISU it would actually be bad i think.
 

JHutch

Member
Mar 19, 2006
576
2
18
come on crooksie...any publicity of ISU events is good..and i dont think attendance will be a concern, plus if you dont go to the games you aren't a true fan anyway
 

JonDMiller

Well-Known Member
Jun 2, 2006
2,538
192
63
With the game possibly being on media com, i see as bad, because ISU won't get any money from the game like it was on espn or abc, and it could possibly also lower the attendance of the game as fans that were planning on going just for the fact it wasn't on TV, now won't go because it is on TV. I like the game on TV because now i can tape it but for ISU it would actually be bad i think.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

So spending money on the billboard was bad, too, or any billboard for that matter, or the adveritsements at Jordan Creek, or the signs in yards, etc, etc, etc,

It's marketing, ts exposure.

If the game is not on TV, ISU gets no money. If they get no money and it is on TV, they get free exposure. People are still going to go to the game.
I don't see how this can be a bad thing what so ever. You have 30,000 season tickets sold, and is that without faculty and students? If so, this isnt even worth a debate. If those groups are included, you are still going to get walk up traffic.

You have to be on TV as much as you can.
 

ISUFan22

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
33,922
904
113
Denver, CO
Exposure is exposure...take what you can get. As it sits today...we will never have a home game on ESPN, as the Big 12 does not have a contract with ESPN. So complaining we can't get on ESPN is rather moot for now.

With the relationship between TV and attendance...Iowa and many of the other Big 10 schools attribute part of their good attendance to the great TV coverage they have. There is a dicussion about this (how TV coverage helps attendance) on the HN board.

Perhaps the ISU office is going to strategically place the official announcement of any game being on TV until a few days to a week prior to the game.

Best of both worlds...maxed out the number of people buying tickets most likely and put it on TV.
 
Last edited:

crooksie_26

Well-Known Member
Mar 24, 2006
647
507
93
agreed

I agree its great to be on TV anytime, exposure is good, i was just concerned about attendance and ISU getting nothing in return for letting mediacom broadcast the game. Believe me the more ISU on TV the better, i just want to make sure its the best for ISU overall. And i will go to the game i promise.
 

crooksie_26

Well-Known Member
Mar 24, 2006
647
507
93
ok

Ok you have convinced me the game being on TV is good for ISU anyway you cut it. I agree with being on TV more can attract more fans, as the more a team is on TV the more likely you are going to become a fan. Question do you think that we will have to pay Mediacom? or is it just a mutual agreement on both sides, i would think someone would have to get paid.
 

garn91

Well-Known Member
Jun 1, 2006
2,193
65
48
Ankeny
Iowa State regulated to what in essence is a state wide cable access channel, that's too funny.
 

ISUFan22

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
33,922
904
113
Denver, CO
Iowa State regulated to what in essence is a state wide cable access channel, that's too funny.

Lets keep the flaming outside....mmmmmmmk?

To answer the questions as to what games...I don't think anyone knows yet. Maybe as soon as Toledo though. :)

For if it will cost extra to see the games on Mediacom...I did not get that vibe at all.
 

JonDMiller

Well-Known Member
Jun 2, 2006
2,538
192
63
Iowa State regulated to what in essence is a state wide cable access channel, that's too funny.
xxxxxxxxxxx

I dont know of any 'local access cable channels' that reach 500,000 homes.

This isn't Wayne's World.
 

garn91

Well-Known Member
Jun 1, 2006
2,193
65
48
Ankeny
What do you call shows called "Talk to your Senator" and programming regarding photography? Local access shows. Does Mediacom Connections have some decent programming? Yeah, but it gets old after it's reaired 5,000 times.
 

ISUFan22

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
33,922
904
113
Denver, CO
WTF? Mediacom has the same basic channels that DirecTV, Cox, etc offer. Your "point" is completely useless...you're searching very hard to try to find a way this is bad.

Keep looking...it doesn't exist.
 

statman

Member
Apr 11, 2006
75
0
6
Does Mediacom Connections have some decent programming? Yeah, but it gets old after it's reaired 5,000 times.

I think that having ISU football games on the channel will greatly improve the channel's ratings compared to it's other programming. If they were smart, they'd just rename it the ISU channel and cover ISU sports 24/7. :D This is about the only regret I have for being a DISH sub, guess I'll have to go to the bar to catch the football games (just have season tix for bball). I'd rather ISU got paid for the rights to show the games, but free coverage is better than no coverage. I'm guessing that free coverage might be the only thing that wouldn't conflict w/ the existing Big 12 contract where the 'best' games get covered for good money and the remainder get left in the dark. And it'd probably hard to convince someone to pay big bucks to air the weaker parts of ISU's schedule that aren't already getting picked up regionally.