I think talent is an issue for this team. Not talent at the top of the roster but talent in the middle of the roster. We have four to five guys that would log meaningful minutes on a NCAA tournament team.
As for agendas, there will always be people that criticize the head coach and players because they are juvenile. There are others that bring up legitimate concerns and questions. There are others that emphasize the positives while acknowledging the concerns. And there are many that will defend a coach no matter the context. Both parties at the extremes have agendas and the two groups in the middle can have a meaningful basketball discussion.
I disagree on the talent, as most tournament teams will have at least a couple multiple year starters. It's more the roles that inexperienced players have had to assume than a talent problem. We don't have those two or three guys with a wealth of experience to lean on. They're just not there.