Yeah there styles are definitely different because Jantz was a much better runner. They both are just really inaccurate and are turnover machines
Iowa Football Recruiting
- Thread starter CyTexMex
- Start date
Yeah there styles are definitely different because Jantz was a much better runner. They both are just really inaccurate and are turnover machines
See @YeahBuddy here is a realistic Hawkeye fan and how they feel after watching Iowa's offense over the weekend
Watching a taped version of the Iowa spring, while drinking a few beers with your buddies....priceless. Yeahbuddy sure knows how to throw a party!!
BTW- did you keep track of tackles, tackles for losses, yards gained after contact, what each player ate that day? Really would hate to miss all the vital stats of a spring game.
This isnt close to being accurate. Stanley has had 11 TO's through his first 13 games as a starter.
Jantz had 23 INT's in his 2 seasons. I cant find career fumble information on Jantz but he lost 5 total when counting the entire 2011 season and first 3 games of 2012.
And to top it off, Jantz only played in 8 games in 2011 it looks like and 11 in 2012. This is a bad troll by you and @CyTwins.
Stanley averages 0.84 TO per game and Jantz averaged at least 1.47 TO per game in his career. That is assuming he didnt lose any fumbles for the last 10 games of the 2012 season.
Both the AP and coaches poll said ISU was better than a team with two first rounders but OK. You guys really love your NFL draft though I'll give you that
You think he'd just give up since I'm providing facts but guess not
The problem with him is he never will admit anything that is negative in any way towards Iowa or one of their players. Stanley is inaccurate and has fumbling issues, that's not an opinion that's a fact. Instead of just accepting that and letting it go he trolls about other things. If someone says Kempt doesn't have a strong arm I will agree. Not every player is perfect. Luckily for us though CMC puts Kempt in situations to succeed
You literally disagree with facts all the time. Voters said ISU was better last year, you disagree. Stats say Kempt was much better than Stanely last year, you disagree, etc
I have to give credit where it's due, your .gif game is almost always at peak performance. Thank you.
So let me get this straight:
When it comes to players, objective evaluations (stats) are the only thing that matters. Twins doesn’t accept any form of subjective evaluation (such as the eye test).
When it comes to teams, subjective rankings (like the AP eye test) are the only thing that matters. Twins doesn’t accept any form of objective (stat-based) ranking.
Seems like a bit of a logical inconsistency. Unless you’re trolling, of course.
