Keep, you're a troll. See how easy that is? Doesn't make it right.
Here's the bottom line for all of you blissfully ignorant out there:
1. When you hear that one of your players may have been involved in a robbery while brandishing a weapon, you suspend them immediately.
2. You gather as many facts as you can and you determine if it appears the info is correct. If it appears he did rob someone with a weapon, he stays suspended and is kicked off the team. If there is conflicting evidence, you work with the police to determine if it's likely that charges will be brought. If they are still working the case, he stays suspended...because he may have robbed someone with a weapon. The police think so enough that the case is still open. If the case is closed with no charges, suspension lifted.
3. If charges are filed, you suspend that player immediately because the prosecutor believes that he has enough info to convict your player of robbing someone with a weapon. This is the easiest thing in the world. You let this play out prior to letting that kid back on the field, UNLESS you don't intend to punish him any more than you have.
What you don't do is let a player play while awaiting robbery charges.
Anyone with an ounce of moral fiber knows that.
This is EXACTLY what EIU does in these situations....