Also, any team in the Pac12 being ranked is laughable as they went 1-9 in bowl games. Who cares if Stanford played in the Pac12 championship, their conference got buzz sawed in the bowl games...meaning other conferences have superior teams
Satisfied that we are top 30 area, are in early rankings for USA. Need to be top 30 to be able to work into the polls after a win or two early on and I feel confident in next season.
AP Poll = ISU Football > Iowa Football in 2017
Why does it not surprise me people are playing the victim card over not being ranked? We’d have the worst record in the top 25 if we were. Yeah, Stanford has 5 losses, but 9 wins to go with it. We had a great season. I don’t need a stupid ranking to tell me that.
I find this more disrespectful, why keep them in the top 25 when they lost to a team head to head pretty much at home. Also a 5 lose Stanford is in the top 25 @20.....I didn't think we would be ranked with 5 losses, but it is a bit of a tip of the cap to us keeping Memphis ranked. Them essentially losing to us at home did not knock them out, so that means we still beat three ranked teams this year.
Satisfied that we are top 30 area, are in early rankings for USA. Need to be top 30 to be able to work into the polls after a win or two early on and I feel confident in next season.
Using the same logic UGA should be number 1 and Bama number 2.Total nonsense. We beat Memphis a week ago and they are higher.
People who bring logic to message boards really irk me. This is no place to be rational. Take that **** to the water cooler.Fairly arguments to put ISU over Stanford and Memphis (or at least closer to it), but you have to look at the previous poll. (More complete source: PollTracker)
Stanford was #15 and lost to then-13 TCU. Memphis was 19th. Iowa State received no votes.
It's unlikely voters are going to swing their ballots enough to have ISU jump that far in one week's games.
That's the problem with the polls. Instead of looking each week at who deserves to be ranked they look at moving teams from the previous week. That results in teams that they had wrong early and had no business being ranked having a whole lot of inertia to stay in the polls and teams on the outside having to overcome that inertia to get in. Every voter should start with a blank sheet every week but I doubt that very many - if any - actually do.Fairly arguments to put ISU over Stanford and Memphis (or at least closer to it), but you have to look at the previous poll. (More complete source: PollTracker)
Stanford was #15 and lost to then-13 TCU. Memphis was 19th. Iowa State received no votes.
It's unlikely voters are going to swing their ballots enough to have ISU jump that far in one week's games.
That's the problem with the polls. Instead of looking each week at who deserves to be ranked they look at moving teams from the previous week. That results in teams that they had wrong early and had no business being ranked having a whole lot of inertia to stay in the polls and teams on the outside having to overcome that inertia to get in. Every voter should start with a blank sheet every week but I doubt that very many - if any - actually do.