Final AP Top 25 Poll

cyattack69

Member
Oct 5, 2017
94
173
8
36
Also, any team in the Pac12 being ranked is laughable as they went 1-9 in bowl games. Who cares if Stanford played in the Pac12 championship, their conference got buzz sawed in the bowl games...meaning other conferences have superior teams
 

BillBrasky4Cy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 10, 2013
17,281
31,522
113
Satisfied that we are top 30 area, are in early rankings for USA. Need to be top 30 to be able to work into the polls after a win or two early on and I feel confident in next season.

True but a lot of the "others receiving votes" in the prior poll lost their bowl game so I thought it was pretty clear that Iowa State was going to be in the 25-30 range.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: BCClone

CarrollCyclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 7, 2011
910
494
63
Final AP Top 25 (1/9)
1. Alabama (57) (13-1)
2. Georgia (13-2)
3. Oklahoma (12-2)
4. Clemson (12-2)
5. Ohio State (12-2)
6. Central Florida (4) (13-0)
7. Wisconsin (13-1)
8. Penn State (11-2)
9. TCU (11-3)
10. Auburn (10-4)
11. Notre Dame (10-3)
12. USC (11-3)
13. Miami (FL) (10-3)
14. Oklahoma State (10-3)
15. Michigan State (10-3)
16. Washington (10-3)
17. Northwestern (10-3)
18. LSU (9-4)
19. Mississippi State (9-4)
20. Stanford (9-5)
21. South Florida (10-2)
22. Boise State (11-3)
23. North Carolina State (9-4)
24. Virginia Tech (9-4)
25. Memphis (10-3)

Others Receiving Votes
Washington State, South Carolina, Iowa State, Army, Florida Atlantic, Troy, Fresno State, San Diego State, Iowa
 

Stewo

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2008
16,856
14,812
113
Iowa
Why does it not surprise me people are playing the victim card over not being ranked? We’d have the worst record in the top 25 if we were. Yeah, Stanford has 5 losses, but 9 wins to go with it. We had a great season. I don’t need a stupid ranking to tell me that.

I think the fact that we're 28th in the final poll of the season speaks volumes. The difference between 25th and 28th is essentially non-existent.
 

jburke

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
4,576
833
113
45
Ankeny, IA
I didn't think we would be ranked with 5 losses, but it is a bit of a tip of the cap to us keeping Memphis ranked. Them essentially losing to us at home did not knock them out, so that means we still beat three ranked teams this year.
I find this more disrespectful, why keep them in the top 25 when they lost to a team head to head pretty much at home. Also a 5 lose Stanford is in the top 25 @20.....
 

madguy30

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 15, 2011
56,944
54,862
113
Satisfied that we are top 30 area, are in early rankings for USA. Need to be top 30 to be able to work into the polls after a win or two early on and I feel confident in next season.

If ISU stays in the Top 30 for the foreseeable future (obviously with times that they're much higher/successful) and we're in for a very fun era.

This season was the first time in forever that I only saw the halftime score at Texas Tech and felt confident in the win. Still gun shy as I kept waiting for that 'ISU moment' but perhaps it's really turned a corner of sorts.
 

mj4cy

Asst. Regional Manager
Staff member
Mar 28, 2006
31,749
14,656
113
Iowa
If we had take care of business against Iowa, OSU, and KSU....heck we were driving to tie it up against WVU.....could have had 11 wins this year and a top 10 finish. Oh well, I love that we were just a few plays from achieving that.
 

Cychl82

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 10, 2009
5,972
4,897
113
Look at Mississippi State even with their wins, losses and total schedule. 9-4 and only ranked opponent win vs LSU.....dear god the love for the SEC is never ending
 

dinger

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 20, 2006
4,114
707
113
Plano, TX
Fairly arguments to put ISU over Stanford and Memphis (or at least closer to it), but you have to look at the previous poll. (More complete source: PollTracker)

Stanford was #15 and lost to then-13 TCU. Memphis was 19th. Iowa State received no votes.

It's unlikely voters are going to swing their ballots enough to have ISU jump that far in one week's games.
People who bring logic to message boards really irk me. This is no place to be rational. Take that **** to the water cooler.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: cyclones500

VeloClone

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2010
47,890
38,347
113
Brooklyn Park, MN
Fairly arguments to put ISU over Stanford and Memphis (or at least closer to it), but you have to look at the previous poll. (More complete source: PollTracker)

Stanford was #15 and lost to then-13 TCU. Memphis was 19th. Iowa State received no votes.

It's unlikely voters are going to swing their ballots enough to have ISU jump that far in one week's games.
That's the problem with the polls. Instead of looking each week at who deserves to be ranked they look at moving teams from the previous week. That results in teams that they had wrong early and had no business being ranked having a whole lot of inertia to stay in the polls and teams on the outside having to overcome that inertia to get in. Every voter should start with a blank sheet every week but I doubt that very many - if any - actually do.
 

BCClone

Well Seen Member.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2011
67,197
63,109
113
Not exactly sure.
That's the problem with the polls. Instead of looking each week at who deserves to be ranked they look at moving teams from the previous week. That results in teams that they had wrong early and had no business being ranked having a whole lot of inertia to stay in the polls and teams on the outside having to overcome that inertia to get in. Every voter should start with a blank sheet every week but I doubt that very many - if any - actually do.


Part of the problem is they start with a blank sheet and can't remember teams and go " what teams can I list now? I know, Michigan was good once and I can't think of that team in florida so lets just go with them and uuuuhhhhhh.....texas, yeah texas sounds good" and continues down the list
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron