Ed Thomas' Killer, Mark Becker Trial

Bardman

Active Member
Dec 7, 2009
735
85
28
Mesa, AZ
So with the insanity deal does the fact that he made the decision to go off medication factor in or is that irrelevant?

pretty sure that matters. if someone voluntarily stops taking their meds with the knowledge they will be unstable that makes them responsible for the things they do while unstable.
 

rdubbs

Well-Known Member
Feb 12, 2009
2,756
91
48
Central Iowa
Interesting read in the Des Moines Register this morning about Mark's mothers testimony. What a tough deal. Even if he is insane, that doesn't make it right.

That video is on the KCRG website (creepy) Today's stuff has been interesting (Becker says the devil is a woman but yet shot Thomas, very strange) I really think his meth and drug use has been a bigger factor for what he's done than him being "insane"
 

Bobber

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
8,880
576
113
Hudson, Iowa
That video is on the KCRG website (creepy) Today's stuff has been interesting (Becker says the devil is a woman but yet shot Thomas, very strange) I really think his meth and drug use has been a bigger factor for what he's done than him being "insane"
.

No doubt. That stuff is so wicked, I don't why people are dumb enough to take it.:no:
 

mj4cy

Asst. Regional Manager
Staff member
Mar 28, 2006
31,835
14,797
113
Iowa
Anyone watched this morning? Broke my heart to see those girls cry on the stand.
 

Clonegrad07

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2008
2,463
109
63
North Carolina
This is garbage... he's not insane. He's a decent actor though. He's not insane at all. He's a meth head who was ****** off at his coach who executed a well thought out plan to kill coach Thomas.

It's too bad that Iowa doesn't have the death penalty for guys like this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tarbox

jsb

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 7, 2008
33,359
39,437
113
This is garbage... he's not insane. He's a decent actor though. He's not insane at all. He's a meth head who was ****** off at his coach who executed a well thought out plan to kill coach Thomas.

It's too bad that Iowa doesn't have the death penalty for guys like this.


He wasn't on meth at the time of the killing. The more I read/hear of this the more I think he could possibly criminally insane.

One of the biggest crimes in this case is him being released from Covenent psych ward the day before the shooting.
 

Clonegrad07

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2008
2,463
109
63
North Carolina
He's not insane... he just acts well. ANYONE can act insane if they want to get away with something... this is so stupid. Throw him in a cell and throw away the key.
 

mj4cy

Asst. Regional Manager
Staff member
Mar 28, 2006
31,835
14,797
113
Iowa
This is garbage... he's not insane. He's a decent actor though. He's not insane at all. He's a meth head who was ****** off at his coach who executed a well thought out plan to kill coach Thomas.

It's too bad that Iowa doesn't have the death penalty for guys like this.



I can understand how drugs could make you go insane, but you still made the choice to take them...I agree, he is obviously mentally ill, but not insane. Lock him away for life. Not only what he did to Ed, and his family, but to see those poor young ladies have to break down in tears reliving that....just horrific.
 

Cybyassociation

Well-Known Member
Mar 5, 2008
9,055
3,826
113
Defense rests today. One incredibly credible expert witness and one that had the potential to make an impact, but IMO dropped the ball on the cross. The State started rebuttal witnesses to attempt to disprove the defenses witnesses. Their first witness was originally supposed to be a defense witness but would not put him on stand since he strongly disagreed with the defenses insanity plea. He has a ton of credibility and has worked with a lot more patients than either of the defenses witnesses. I would expect closing statements tomorrow and also for the jury to begin deliberations.
 

cdekovic

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2006
1,163
90
48
Ames
I am not a believer in "Innocent by reason of Insanity". With all the witnesses, testimony and evidence, he is guilty of murder. He should be "Guilty by reason of Insanity". Then the courts could have a different sentencing for an Insane murderer versus a sane murder. The evidence is indisputable. He is guilty of murder.
 

Cybyassociation

Well-Known Member
Mar 5, 2008
9,055
3,826
113
I am not a believer in "Innocent by reason of Insanity". With all the witnesses, testimony and evidence, he is guilty of murder. He should be "Guilty by reason of Insanity". Then the courts could have a different sentencing for an Insane murderer versus a sane murder. The evidence is indisputable. He is guilty of murder.

That's actually what he would be found if he's not found flat out guilty. He would be guilty by means of insanity. Either way, he will be locked up for a long, long time. I think even if he's found guilty by means of insanity, he will spend life out of society. My understanding is that he would be put in a prison for the mentally ill or something along those lines. So he would be locked away, but just with more help. Kinda like Shutter Island.
 

Mr Janny

Welcome to the Office of Secret Intelligence
Staff member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
Mar 27, 2006
42,745
33,768
113
I am not a believer in "Innocent by reason of Insanity". With all the witnesses, testimony and evidence, he is guilty of murder. He should be "Guilty by reason of Insanity". Then the courts could have a different sentencing for an Insane murderer versus a sane murder. The evidence is indisputable. He is guilty of murder.

Is there such a legal term as "Innocent by reason of Insanity?" I always thought it was "Not Guilty by reason of insanity." In my mind, there is a big difference between being found not guilty and being found innocent. Maybe there's no difference. Any lawyers want to clear this up?
 

Cybyassociation

Well-Known Member
Mar 5, 2008
9,055
3,826
113
Is there such a legal term as "Innocent by reason of Insanity?" I always thought it was "Not Guilty by reason of insanity." In my mind, there is a big difference between being found not guilty and being found innocent. Maybe there's no difference. Any lawyers want to clear this up?

The live blogger that sits in every day has to repeat herself almost daily that he will be found guilty no matter what. He does have an opportunity to be let out in the far far far away future if he regains his sanity. But I'm pretty sure it's up to the judge or jury to determine whether or not he has the opportunity to be up for any sort of release ever.
 

Mr Janny

Welcome to the Office of Secret Intelligence
Staff member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
Mar 27, 2006
42,745
33,768
113
The live blogger that sits in every day has to repeat herself almost daily that he will be found guilty no matter what. He does have an opportunity to be let out in the far far far away future if he regains his sanity. But I'm pretty sure it's up to the judge or jury to determine whether or not he has the opportunity to be up for any sort of release ever.

Thanks for clearing that up.
 

Cybyassociation

Well-Known Member
Mar 5, 2008
9,055
3,826
113
I think you also really have to take into account the demographics of the Jury. I believe the youngest person was a 46 year old. Most of the jurors are "old school" and I really dont see them as having any sympathy for Becker. Also, they are from a very religious and very conservative area in Iowa. This is a big reason why the defense wanted the trial moved. Even if the jury finds him insane, I dont see them giving him anything less than life.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron