I truely would rather get transfers from D1 schools than JUCO transfers.
Say no to Jamal Tinsleys?
Take quality players wherever they are- high school, prep schools, 4 year colleges or JUCOS.
I truely would rather get transfers from D1 schools than JUCO transfers.
Say no to Jamal Tinsleys?
Take quality players wherever they are- high school, prep schools, 4 year colleges or JUCOS.
Lord, seriously, you must understand this.
First, the guy wants to coach. And I am sure that he has advancement aspirations.
In order to advance in his profession he has to have success. You have to have players to win. Recruiting, especially when you just have them for two years, is lifeblood. You can't have kids thinking you won't have their back.
But, again not wanting to be a juco coach in indianola, iowa forever, you aren't going to **** all over the coach at one of the two top 6 programs in your state. Especially one with the connections that a Fred Hoiberg has.
Come on it isn't that complicated. Coaches all over the country will stand up for their players, but they aren't going to limit their advancement opportunities for anyone.
Do we know it was slander? All I've got to go on is a guy on here with "inside info" he can't disclose.Lord, seriously. You are the one not understanding. If you dont think that his comments didnt effect his relations with Fred well I guess I would ask you how you would judge a colleague that openly slanders you to the press? That isn't defending a player that is launching an attack.
Yes we know it was slander because it is not possible to pull a signed LOI without losing that scholly. Fred could not pull it for Kane just because kane was better. Only way is if he did not become eligible or some other term. Just kicking him off the team isnt enough he would still get the scholly. Barring a waiver his career is over (either by ncaa for a 6th year or by NLI steering committee to not have to sit out). Something happenned and it wasn't Kane.Do we know it was slander? All I've got to go on is a guy on here with "inside info" he can't disclose.
Yes we know it was slander because it is not possible to pull a signed LOI without losing that scholly. Fred could not pull it for Kane just because kane was better. Only way is if he did not become eligible or some other term. Just kicking him off the team isnt enough he would still get the scholly. Barring a waiver his career is over (either by ncaa for a 6th year or by NLI steering committee to not have to sit out). Something happenned and it wasn't Kane.
Yes we know it was slander because it is not possible to pull a signed LOI without losing that scholly. Fred could not pull it for Kane just because kane was better. Only way is if he did not become eligible or some other term. Just kicking him off the team isnt enough he would still get the scholly. Barring a waiver his career is over (either by ncaa for a 6th year or by NLI steering committee to not have to sit out). Something happenned and it wasn't Kane.
So Fred can do something no other division one coach can do in cutting someone that has signed a LOI JUST to get a better player? He could pull other schollies up until July 1st but not that one. Please give your rationale on how you think the indian hills coach could of been accurate. There are a lot of unknowns but that isnt one of them.I'm going to bet that it isn't slander.
I'm going to bet that it isn't slander.
So Fred can do something no other division one coach can do in cutting someone that has signed a LOI JUST to get a better player? He could pull other schollies up until July 1st but not that one. Please give your rationale on how you think the indian hills coach could of been accurate. There are a lot of unknowns but that isnt one of them.
A reply to this:
is this?????:
The CF website must not be functioning on my laptop.
Yes. Am I missing something?
I think Cydkar is implying that since the IHCC coach's comments were in print means that it would technically be considered libel and not slander. However, when the coach made those comments, I'm sure they were just spoken comments to a reporter over the phone or something, so it would actually be slander (if what he said isn't true). The fact that it later appeared in print is irrelevant.
So Fred can do something no other division one coach can do in cutting someone that has signed a LOI JUST to get a better player? He could pull other schollies up until July 1st but not that one. Please give your rationale on how you think the indian hills coach could of been accurate. There are a lot of unknowns but that isnt one of them.
If a player is afraid to come here because "if what Fred did to Amardi", then odds are said player isn't good enough to be here in the first place. We are after a lot of good recruits, and none of them will be afraid to come here because they aren't good enough to make the team.
Evidently not....:skeptical:Can't we keep this thread about Kane? And possibly keep this argument in the Armardi eligibility thread?
![]()
So Fred can do something no other division one coach can do in cutting someone that has signed a LOI JUST to get a better player? He could pull other schollies up until July 1st but not that one. Please give your rationale on how you think the indian hills coach could of been accurate. There are a lot of unknowns but that isnt one of them.