I appreciate all you guy's thoughts on movies, critics, and whatnot. Like what you like and don't be ashamed of it. Personally, I'm kind of a movie buff and do appreciate the critics thoughts beings how they tend to relate fairly close to my thoughts as well. For instance, if you compare my rankings of all the superhero movies as compared to say a Rotten Tomatoes conglomerate rankings of them, you'll see they relate pretty close to one another. Granted, there are some outliers where we don't agree (Man of Steel, Iron Man 3), just like everyone will have, but I do find them to be a fairly accurate source of whether a movie is worth my time or not. Yes, I agree there is some bias in there, especially when it comes to the recent DCEU movies as compared to Marvel movies, but it isn't to the level where they are calling a good movie bad. If I'm honest with myself, Batman vs Superman is still NOT a good movie, however, it probably deserves more of a 50% RT ranking verses a 27% one.
I like to compare movie critics reviews to recruit ranking services in sports where an individual review is comparable to an individual site's (Rivals for example) ranking of a recruit, whereas a movie site like Rotten Tomatoes or Metacritic, who compiles the conglomerate of many reviews is more comparable to 247's index ranking, which compiles the recruit rankings of many different websites. With that said, are the recruiting website's always accurate, even the index ones? Absolutely not. You are going to always have some diamonds in the rough, as well as some overrated recruits. However, those rankings aren't completely worthless either. It isn't just a coincidence that the teams that consistently get the highest rated recruits also typically are the best teams over time verses those who don't.
Again, I appreciate everyone's thoughts on the matter. When it comes to movies, still always think for yourself and like what you like. Don't be ashamed of it either. Even though I value these critics thoughts on Suicide Squad still, I'm still going in with a completely open mind.
Nope. Movie critiques are still just peoples' opinions... the difference between movie critics and all your Facebook friends is that the critics fooled someone into paying them to publish their opinions. Especially for big budget movies like these, I usually have a pretty good idea of what to expect just based on trailers, cast, and crew. I find movie reviews to be more useful for smaller, off-the-grid productions that don't have the hype or name power behind it.
I get so few chances to see movies in the theater anymore (life with a 2 year old), so I generally just treat that time as a deserved distraction, and try not to worry too much about whether it lived up to expectations.
I hear yah on the 2 year old thing. I've got a near 2 year old myself. However, for me, seeing movies in theaters is kind of my release to get away from the wife and kid for a couple hours with buddies. Some guys golf, some guys go shooting.... etc. To each their own. The thing I like about movies verses golfing is that they tend to take less time away from the family than say golfing does. 18 holes of golfing takes pretty much a half day of time, whereas I can slip out to a movie after the kid even goes to bed.
Last edited: