Culver could push for ISU to Big Ten

cyclones500

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2010
38,659
26,638
113
Michigan
basslakebeacon.com
To condense a few topics throughout the thread ... this does have ramifications beyond sports. That's the focal point, but it isn't the end-all, as far as politicians stepping in (like, you know, the entire state of Texas situation...)

More pressing issues? Sure. But it could be a huge downfall for the state if the worst-case scenarios play out (and I don't think it'll get that bad, but it could)

I'm an ISU alum who hasn't lived in Iowa for a long time, so I'm not going to chomp on in-state political climate. I do think it seems "too little, too late" — maybe Culver hadn't been pressed on the issue until the 11th hour and maybe it seems like a political move.

I'd prefer that to "Eh."
 

MrTwister

New Member
Apr 7, 2010
10
0
1
Why are politics being involved at all? Sports should be devoid of political meddling. There are far more important things to worry for elected officials than conference realignment.

Why wouldn't politicians be involved when it involves multi-million $ state institutions. The real question is can they affect the situation since it is not an "in state" issue. And there is little chance that anything will be done on a federal level for state institutions.
 

Al_4_State

Moderator
Staff member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 27, 2006
32,356
28,603
113
39
Driftless Region
Visit site
Yeah, but they havent really recovered from the drop when Snyder left. Also, KSU is in a much worse state academically, which has to be hurting their situation. Id see it more like nebraska's situation. If we'd had great success and huge attendance the last 10 years, we'd be in a similar position to them... no tv's but success.

Except Nebraska brings 2 million more TV sets than we do. It's not a ton, but it's more than 0.
 

GoShow97

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2006
1,843
86
48
homeless
I realize it is going to be difficult but please try to keep this from becoming a big political discussion. Let's try and discuss the story itself, not your thoughts/opinions on Chet Culver the politician.

How can anyone keep it from becoming political when it already is. The entire article of what Culver is suggesting/soap boxing is nothing but political. I don't know how any logical person could seperate the two.
 

Sterling4Cy

Active Member
Nov 13, 2006
344
99
28
47
Deace brought up a good point this moring, why not try to get Grassley and Harkin involved in lieu of Culver. They would pull more clout nationally.
 

weR138

Well-Known Member
Feb 20, 2008
12,187
5,138
113
Why wouldn't politicians be involved when it involves multi-million $ state institutions. The real question is can they affect the situation since it is not an "in state" issue. And there is little chance that anything will be done on a federal level for state institutions.

I don't know why so many people fail to understand this. ISU is a huge employer not to mention the economic engine that runs Ames, IA.
 

cy2win

Active Member
May 15, 2006
585
49
28
Deace brought up a good point this moring, why not try to get Grassley and Harkin involved in lieu of Culver. They would pull more clout nationally.

Kansas Senators Roberts and Brownback have both issued statements, so Iowa's senators at least have a precedent to follow. Harkin is an ISU grad for crying out loud. I am grateful for Governor Culver's action nonetheless. I hope some good comes of it.

Roberts, Brownback call for Big 12 to stay together | KansasCity.com Prime Buzz
 

Clark

Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2009
18,366
4,607
113
Altoona
I would think it would be harder for federal politicians to get involved. For one thing it would take both the house and senate's approval with the house being really hard to get because the states who might have a problem with this are also the states with the least population (and therefore representatives).

Even in the Senate, is there even a scenario where 51 Senators would be willing to eliminate the non-profit status of AD's.
 

swarthmoreCY

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2008
16,374
736
83
Here nor there
I would think it would be harder for federal politicians to get involved. For one thing it would take both the house and senate's approval with the house being really hard to get because the states who might have a problem with this are also the states with the least population (and therefore representatives).

Even in the Senate, is there even a scenario where 51 Senators would be willing to eliminate the non-profit status of AD's.

Plenty of "small state" issues gets passed. There are ways to get it done, if Chuck really wanted to.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron