We are talking about water management right?
The 2010 Iowa River Dam Inventory calls the dam at Cedar Rapids a 'low-head' dam. Yet it is one of the most unusual low head dams I've ever seen. It has gates which open or close depending on the water flow. Odd that those gates have been open most of the summer. Heck, if Waterloo doesn't have something similar to control that 70+ feet of water depth at George Wythe park, then I just don't know. Perhaps there SHOULD be more flood control gates along the Cedar?
But what am I complaining about? A 2010 survey that has obviously been out of date since plans were made for Interstate 380 to pass over the dam at Cedar Rapids? That seems far less a complaint than Congress passing authorization for work on flood control along the Cedar and yet allocating NO funds for such work (thank you Chuck Grassley and Republicans). And when few funds are allocated for post flood rebuilding along the Cedar, it must first pass through DSM where large buckets are dipped into that pile of cash and diverted to who knows where. No, a lot more in Iowa needs the kind of management that our rivers and streams should be getting, but it won't come as long as it has to pass through political bodies.