I don't think he said that. He just said teams seeded 1-7 are locks and can't fall out of the tourney. I don't think he meant the top overall 7 seeds were locks not to drop.
You're right. I misread that.
I don't think he said that. He just said teams seeded 1-7 are locks and can't fall out of the tourney. I don't think he meant the top overall 7 seeds were locks not to drop.
You are correct; I incorrectly wrote that.All session tickets should be a total of 6 games. The 2 morning/afternoon games, the 2 evening games, and the 2 games for Saturday.
Join the Big Ten so he can overvalue usLMAO Palm still has Baylor as a 2 seed over us and he doesn't even have Iowa State as the Midwest 3. What else do we have to do?
Six games, not three (three sessions, two games per session). I also got the all session tickets. I purchased them between the WV and OU games at the end of February. Should be fun!I bit the bullet and this morning bought an all-session ticket in Omaha. That ticket for 3 games cost just a little more than my Big12 Tournament ticket for 11 games.
No. I think he means locked into the top 7. The top 30 are locks to make the tournament at this point.I don't think he said that. He just said teams seeded 1-7 are locks and can't fall out of the tourney. I don't think he meant the top overall 7 seeds were locks not to drop.
No, the non con essentially gets counted twice and yes this absolutely happens.You literally said the committee weighs the non-con above the full body of work. There is simply zero evidence that they have ever done that.
Context clues. Why would he talk about teams 1-7 (7 teams) being safe, teams 8, 9 and 10 (3 teams) needing one more win to feel safe and then every other comment is about a team trying to just get in.No. I think he means locked into the top 7. The top 30 are locks to make the tournament at this point.
Also. It’s just some dudes opinion so it doesn’t really matter.
No, the non con essentially gets counted twice and yes this absolutely happens.
Take the first word out of that sentence and tell me how the meaning changed.Literally nobody is claiming that.
I'm actually interpreting this that Purdue is likely overseeded and more ripe for an "upset", than say Houston, UConn, and that teams like Arizona or Iowa State are more likely to "exceed their seed" and you'd rather not face them.Purdue at the top, some things never change lol
Exactly; who cares if you played a hard a schedule if (hypothetically) you lost to all those good teams? Other metrics already reward you for losing to a good team by less than the metrics expected.SOS is stupid, we might as well go back to RPI if that is a relevant statistic.
SOR and WAB are what actually matters. Winning games > Losing games
Teams like BYU are our kryptonite and their is 1 team that I want to avoid at all cost that could be on the 6/7 line for the 2nd round....St. Mary's.
I think that’s what he meant by things never change.I'm actually interpreting this that Purdue is likely overseeded and more ripe for an "upset", than say Houston, UConn, and that teams like Arizona or Iowa State are more likely to "exceed their seed" and you'd rather not face them.
I interpreted this to mean they rate Houston as correctly seeded and most likely to back it up.
And we beat Kansas and Houston and were a half second away from getting Baylor on the road. That's pretty parallel to Kansas and they did that in November, what have they done lately?lets re-word it
the committee will look at KU beating UCONN and Tennessee as better than Iowa State beating Green Bay and Lindenwood.