Big Games, Refs and Questionable Calls

Refs influenced in big games with title implications?

  • I think the refs are influenced in games like this

    Votes: 28 59.6%
  • I do NOT think they are influenced in games like this

    Votes: 14 29.8%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 5 10.6%

  • Total voters
    47

ISUFan22

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
33,922
904
113
Denver, CO
Ok, may stir the pot...but some observations today building on past rumors of impartial refs.

In the OU-Mizzou game there have been a couple questionable pass interference calls.

But most notably, in the Pitt-WVU game, there was just a very questionable hold call that took a TD away from Pitt that would have put them up by 10 (with the extra point) with the 4th quarter left to play.

Obviously these are huge games with big dollar implications for the teams and their conferences. It behooves the Big 12 and Big East to have Mizzou and WVU win.

Have the refs been subtly reminded of such?
 
Last edited:

ISUFan22

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
33,922
904
113
Denver, CO
I didn't see them too close, I am basically bringing the main subject up for discussion. It's definitely debateable on those calls.

The WVU call though is what caused this post, because that was a horrible call.

And this coming from a guy that wants WVU to win.
 

ISUAlum2002

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
22,888
5,140
113
Toon Town, IA
The call against Pitt appeared to be due to the fact that the official had bad positioning. All he could see was the back of the Pitt receiver and saw the defender struggling to get on the outside of him and assumed that the Pitt player was holding him by the jersey.

That said, yes, I do believe officials know who *should* win, and they have assuredly been reminded as to where the money comes from to pay them.
 

jumbopackage

Well-Known Member
Sep 18, 2007
5,479
249
63
I don't think there is a conspiracy involved, but I do think that officials might be unconsciously influenced by their own biases.

I haven't seen really any questionable calls today, outside of one personal foul call that was just bizarre in either the Arizona game or the WVU game, cant' remember which.
 

mwitt

Well-Known Member
Mar 23, 2006
5,838
182
63
I assume you meant the Big East would benefit from WVU winning, not Pittsburgh.
 

ISUFan22

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
33,922
904
113
Denver, CO
Thanks mwitt, yes.

Another questionable call - missed defensive holding call that would've kept a drive alive for Pitt, right after Pitt had a 3rd down conversion nullified by a holding penalty.
 

Wesley

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
70,923
546
113
Omaha
Looks like WVU still could not win with ref bias. Wanstedt won a big game? Wow. Extend his contract.
 

tidbit

Member
Apr 10, 2006
801
16
18
83
dallas county, iowa
Looks like WVU still could not win with ref bias. Wanstedt won a big game? Wow. Extend his contract.



Coincidently, Wanstedt DID get a new 3 year extension this week. And guess who the NEW ad at Pitt is??? Does the name Steve Pederson and his 2.2 MILLION dollars from Neb. mean anything. Yep Pitt hired him this week.. But in fairness he didn't give the contract to him, the interim ad did, but thought it was funny that Pederson was there for the signing, and he will get the blame if Wanstedt doesn't keep turning the program.
 

The_Architect

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
13,422
2,034
113
It was strange to see Mizzou get all the calls against OU. I bet it was the first time in history that OU has had to battle the refs.
 

cycloneworld

Facebook Knows All
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 20, 2006
30,179
22,529
113
Urbandale, IA
In football I don't think the refs do this near as much as in basketball. It seems like there are games where it is very obvious who is supposed to win the game.

But I'm sure it happens to some degree in FB too. I'm not so sure if that happened this weekend because both the Big 12 and the Big East were already set in getting 2 teams and 1 team respectively into the BCS. However, I'm sure the Big East would have loved to see one of their teams in the NC game.

Do I think the conferences tell their refs how to officiate? No. But I do think they may whisper in the refs' ears letting them know what is on the line in some games.
 

SuperCy

Well-Known Member
Nov 30, 2006
3,881
101
63
Smallville/Metropolis
There is NO way that the officials in the WVU-Pitt game couldn't have known the implications of their calls. I'm not one for conspiracy theories, but this one seemed hard to ignore.
 

Land Grant

Well-Known Member
Oct 30, 2006
1,063
903
113
I think that in general refs calls are influenced (albeit unconsciously) by who they think is the the better team. This is particularly evident when traditional powerhouses are in tight games with lesser knowns.

I would hope that conference execs are not actively working to influence calls on the field. That would be criminal.
 

cmoneyr

Well-Known Member
Nov 8, 2006
8,422
343
83
41
Ames, Born and Raised
I don't think that refs necesarilly make game changing calls on purpose. It's hard not to buy into all the hype of these big games though, it's not like the refs are sequestered away from the outside world before games. But I think as a whole they do the best job they can. If a team is a major underdog and has a number of calls go against them it's only natural to wonder if they're called that way because they're not "supposed" to win. I'm sure there are refs in the NCAA at this very moment who are biased and who will call games unfairly, but I think they'd be the exception and not the rule. I'd like to think that as refs and as people they would have more integrity than that.

The problem with reffing is that if you do your job well and make all the right calls nobody cares, because that's your job. However if you miss some close calls then you're all over the news as being an unfair official. Hard job and I'd never want it.