2025-2025 Transfer Portal Needs, Wants, Updates

NEICyFan

Well-Known Member
Feb 10, 2011
2,113
749
113


I hope Iowa fans keep making burner accounts for Angelo


It is amazing to me how many people get duped by troll accounts who aren’t hiding the fact they are troll accounts, making it clear on their profile page. Like the Paniro one literally says it isn’t Paniro. The stupidity is astounding.
 

crooksie_26

Well-Known Member
Mar 24, 2006
641
499
63
The transfer portal stuff is getting a bit crazy. It's literally PSU, OSU and Iowa, if they don't change rules that will be the foreseeable future, another team may get in the top 3 every so often, but this is setting up to be the same old same old year in and year out.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: TheJackWePack5

TheJackWePack5

Well-Known Member
Oct 2, 2011
11,533
11,420
113
Ankeny, IA.
The transfer portal stuff is getting a bit crazy. It's literally PSU, OSU and Iowa, if they don't change rules that will be the foreseeable future, another team may get in the top 3 every so often, but this is setting up to be the same old same old year in and year out.
The same way it has generally been forever.

PSU, OkSt, Iowa will be the clear cut top 3 and a program like OSU, Michigan, Nebraska, Minnesota, Cornell, (hopefully ISU), etc. will crack the top 3 or 4 on occasion.
 

BCClone

Well Seen Member.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2011
67,477
63,486
113
Not exactly sure.
The same way it has generally been forever.

PSU, OkSt, Iowa will be the clear cut top 3 and a program like OSU, Michigan, Nebraska, Minnesota, Cornell, (hopefully ISU), etc. will crack the top 3 or 4 on occasion.
I think it’s Penn state with Okie state racing up on them, Iowa trying to keep up and the other programs you listed just trying to stay on the lead lap with the others only hope is a big crash in the guys infront.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: MattforState

CyCloneRastlinG

Well-Known Member
Oct 15, 2017
3,896
4,984
113
Iowa
The same way it has generally been forever.

PSU, OkSt, Iowa will be the clear cut top 3 and a program like OSU, Michigan, Nebraska, Minnesota, Cornell, (hopefully ISU), etc. will crack the top 3 or 4 on occasion.
The saving grace here will be a 30-man roster limit.

If guys don't just gray shirt and hang out in the RTC club, this is our saving grace with NIL and the power programs. And I'm simply talking about the smaller bottom 25% of programs.

The talent will flow downhill and end up at all the other programs because most rosters right now are holding 30-40 kids. Every other program will benefit from roster limits.
 

RHBVClone

Active Member
Mar 13, 2011
87
174
33
From an ESPN article:
The House settlement states that athletes have to report any NIL deal they sign with a third party that is worth more than $600 and that any such deal has to be for a "valid business purpose."

Acceptable deals, deemed "real NIL," can range from a national advertising campaign for, say USC women's basketball star JuJu Watkins, to a three-figure appearance fee at a local car dealer for a lesser known athlete.

The power conferences have contracted with auditing giant Deloitte to review booster NIL deals and decide whether each is a legitimate endorsement contract or a veiled attempt to circumvent the salary cap.

Deloitte plans to use data from past endorsement deals signed by college and professional athletes along with other information to pinpoint whether each deal exceeds an athlete's fair market value.

The power conferences are also creating a new organization tasked to enforce the salary cap and "fair market value" rules. This new entity will be separate from the NCAA's enforcement arm. Several of the college sports leaders involved in creating the new entity say it's an attempt to fully reset the crime-and-punishment process of college sports that has long been criticized for its lack of efficiency, transparency and equal treatment among offenders. It could be in place as soon as July 1.

A group of 10 power conference athletic directors have been meeting regularly during the past six months to design the new organization but have not publicly shared any details about what kinds of punishments a school or its athletes might face if they break the rules or how they intend to solve the same problems that roiled the NCAA's enforcement team.
$600 is such a laughably low number. Heck, even banks will let you bring in up to $10k in cash before they have to file a report and ask questions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CloneFanInKC

TheJackWePack5

Well-Known Member
Oct 2, 2011
11,533
11,420
113
Ankeny, IA.
I think it’s Penn state with Okie state racing up on them, Iowa trying to keep up and the other programs you listed just trying to stay on the lead lap with the others only hope is a big crash in the guys infront.
I do agree with that for sure.

I also think in the short term Iowa is the clear #2 team heading into next year at this point but obviously things are changing daily.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BCClone

BCClone

Well Seen Member.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2011
67,477
63,486
113
Not exactly sure.
I do agree with that for sure.

I also think in the short term Iowa is the clear #2 team heading into next year at this point but obviously things are changing daily.
Okie states money helped quite a bit but I think the Taylor vs Brands situation is a bigger deal in the long run. Taylor is kinda fresh and exciting to college kids. Brands is far from those things.

Dresser comes across as the old sage guy, kind of that older, cooler dude that you like to hang around.
 

Cylife

Active Member
Oct 22, 2024
76
143
33
The saving grace here will be a 30-man roster limit.

If guys don't just gray shirt and hang out in the RTC club, this is our saving grace with NIL and the power programs. And I'm simply talking about the smaller bottom 25% of programs.

The talent will flow downhill and end up at all the other programs because most rosters right now are holding 30-40 kids. Every other program will benefit from roster limits.
This is the problem I read about. The rich teams can stash an incoming freshman on their RTC and pay him 50-100k to go to school and train. If they notice he’s a stud then they’ll push out someone on the 30 man the next year who was worse. That’s why I said the only way this roster limitation works is if the RTC is for post grads and Olympic redshirts. Then PSU only has 30 like everyone else
 

G-imJustafan

Well-Known Member
Sep 9, 2022
429
526
93
This is the problem I read about. The rich teams can stash an incoming freshman on their RTC and pay him 50-100k to go to school and train. If they notice he’s a stud then they’ll push out someone on the 30 man the next year who was worse. That’s why I said the only way this roster limitation works is if the RTC is for post grads and Olympic redshirts. Then PSU only has 30 like everyone else
we are going to see more manipulation and puzzle piecing than a game of Tetris
 

TheJackWePack5

Well-Known Member
Oct 2, 2011
11,533
11,420
113
Ankeny, IA.
Okie states money helped quite a bit but I think the Taylor vs Brands situation is a bigger deal in the long run. Taylor is kinda fresh and exciting to college kids. Brands is far from those things.

Dresser comes across as the old sage guy, kind of that older, cooler dude that you like to hang around.
Brands is far from those things but it hasn’t hurt them in getting high end talent, that’s for sure.