I can't believe how many are doubting this post. I'm confident this is 100 percent a factual interpretation of the close of regulation. And understandably so, from both sides. Prohm had a reasonable plan to foul near half court, and Dixon countered with the perfect hail Mary. The placement of the screen and release was exactly what was needed to counter the defensive call, and it banked in. ****.One coach had a plan, the other coach had a plan to set the screen right at the point where the first coach had instructed his team to foul. Seems like a coaching decision...not execution. Dixon was one step ahead of Prohm, Prohm never expected a screen there, he ignorantly thought they'd just let us foul them.