I'm guessing that in a power 32 conference the fan base that's use to winning 7-10 games a yr isn't going to be very happy taking a sub .500 season. No matter how it's set up someone has to take a loss.
Why limit to 32 teams...just because the NFL has 32 teams...hogwash. The Power 5 set up right now...64 teams...is already in position to make this happen...breaking away from the traditional NCAA structure seems more likely to me. Plus, the conference themselves have self preservation ideals that will drive how this moves forward. I do like that the writer recognizes that USC is all that the PAC 12 has to offer in the way of "elite...top 32" schools...putting the other 11 schools in the bottom 32. Ouch.
Did you enjoy that Browns @ Patriots game the other day? Yikes! Give me the NFC North or give me death!I wish the NFL would do something like this. Living in Iowa I am tired of only watching NFC North games. I wish channels like CBS and FOX were for the Game of the week games and channels like CBS Sports, FS1, ESPN etc would show the remaining games. Would be interesting to see if they would make more money that way vs sunday ticket.
I could see that. However, many people would probably pick a team to follow in both leagues as well, like most people have a favorite NFL team and NCAA team. Would you completely stop watching Iowa State games?
Well, the richest entity in terms of TV rights is the NFL, and everyone gets an equal share regardless of whether a small market, irrelevant team, or big brands like the Cowboys. The richest conferences, the SEC and Big 10, also were the conferences most willing to have wealth redistribution.Greed always wins out so if the Ohio States, Alabama's or Texas can find a way to keep a bigger share of the TV rights pie, they will.
Yeah this looks like my old high school papers that needed to be 3 pages long when I only had 1+ pages of information!He must be paid per line
The difference is that folks are already attached to their Universities, but nobody is attached to G-League teams. So, I do think a Super League of teams like Alabama, Oklahoma, Ohio State, Southern California, etc. would be very successful. I also think the next level (which would be similar to the way it is now) with teams like Iowa State, Purdue, Mizzou, Wash. State, etc. would also be successful. I would actually prefer it, as teams like Iowa State would actually have a real chance to win Championships (Think Big Xii without OU and Texas). This level could add some of the best programs from the G5 to replace the Super teams that leave. Then, the lower G5s can have their own subdivision too. Bottom line is that I don't think Iowa State football is threatened by a Super League of 32 or less and might find it liberating.I think people would stop watching the schools that pay players - people don't watch the pro minor leagues now. Take basketball for example: When is g league night on ESPN? The worst g league team is better than the best college team and they can't get on TV. Paid college teams would be the 3rd best pro league in the US. I think the ameture model is a big part of the draw for audiences
Meh. I recall in my lifetime this thing called the AFL. No way they could compete with the NFL. But then the Chiefs destroyed the Vikings. The end of the league via merger. No way those 32 will continue to separate themselves from the pack. Heck, we should be able to beat Texas this year. Why on earth should they be elevated to a higher status? Or, the simple fact we beat Oklahoma a couple years ago. Bottomline: ISU is too close to those schools to demote them. And, as far as money goes, I could never understand why those schools have more money. Alumni count alone would put the University of Illinois in the hunt for wealth. C'mon folks. This 'A' league approach is protectionism at its best. It'll fail.The difference is that folks are already attached to their Universities, but nobody is attached to G-League teams. So, I do think a Super League of teams like Alabama, Oklahoma, Ohio State, Southern California, etc. would be very successful. I also think the next level (which would be similar to the way it is now) with teams like Iowa State, Purdue, Mizzou, Wash. State, etc. would also be successful. I would actually prefer it, as teams like Iowa State would actually have a real chance to win Championships (Think Big Xii without OU and Texas). This level could add some of the best programs from the G5 to replace the Super teams that leave. Then, the lower G5s can have their own subdivision too. Bottom line is that I don't think Iowa State football is threatened by a Super League of 32 or less and might find it liberating.
Great point. And they can say "at least we're in the A league". Boy, I'll bet that's WEEEE WEEEE WEEEE all the way homePart of me wants to see this happen. I’d love to see some of those “super teams” get taken down a notch. As has been mentioned before in this thread, can you imagine an Ohio State, Alabama, LSU, “lil ole” Clemson, Michigan, etc, etc going 2-10/1-11, and possibly having that happen multiple times in a row? Might cause riots.
The problem is in terms of media "college football" coverage, shows, articles become synonymous with the 32 team league. The dollars will absolutely dry up for the lesser league as it will have zero importance in the eyes of sports media and as a result zero importance in the eyes of all but the die hards.The difference is that folks are already attached to their Universities, but nobody is attached to G-League teams. So, I do think a Super League of teams like Alabama, Oklahoma, Ohio State, Southern California, etc. would be very successful. I also think the next level (which would be similar to the way it is now) with teams like Iowa State, Purdue, Mizzou, Wash. State, etc. would also be successful. I would actually prefer it, as teams like Iowa State would actually have a real chance to win Championships (Think Big Xii without OU and Texas). This level could add some of the best programs from the G5 to replace the Super teams that leave. Then, the lower G5s can have their own subdivision too. Bottom line is that I don't think Iowa State football is threatened by a Super League of 32 or less and might find it liberating.
There’s little chance the 32 tier happens without first stopping at 64/65 schools paying athletes, then something less as schools opt out for a more traditional “collegiate” model. It would have to be gradual, and include some form of relegationMeh. I recall in my lifetime this thing called the AFL. No way they could compete with the NFL. But then the Chiefs destroyed the Vikings. The end of the league via merger. No way those 32 will continue to separate themselves from the pack. Heck, we should be able to beat Texas this year. Why on earth should they be elevated to a higher status? Or, the simple fact we beat Oklahoma a couple years ago. Bottomline: ISU is too close to those schools to demote them. And, as far as money goes, I could never understand why those schools have more money. Alumni count alone would put the University of Illinois in the hunt for wealth. C'mon folks. This 'A' league approach is protectionism at its best. It'll fail.
Not sure why cw posted this. It's a whole article about nothing happening
Yeah this looks like my old high school papers that needed to be 3 pages long when I only had 1+ pages of information!