Roku TV tiers

Cyforce

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2009
17,176
13,041
113
Des Moines
I’m wanting to upgrade the TV in the bedroom. I currently have a Samsung 40”. Which I’ve had 10-12 years. Since I put a 75” LG in the living room I really have no desire to older tube. I upgraded to a Roku streaming/ sound bar to watch Marquee. So I think I want to go Roku in the bedroom probably 65”. I was wondering if I’m only going to use it to watch tv are the better versions worth it?
 

vacyclone

Active Member
Nov 17, 2012
121
234
43
I own 3 Rokus that are about 4-5 years old, and I'm happy to share my thoughts. For the 2 places that I could easily get a wired ethernet connection to, I went with the Ultra mainly for that reason. I assumed that a wired connection would be more reliable than Wifi - not sure if that's true, but I've never had any issues. I have a much cheaper Roku for upstairs that uses Wifi. It's a little slower to respond to button presses, but it's not a dealbreaker. I think the price difference back then was similar to now, about $100 to $30.

Another thing about the Ultra I liked was that the remote has a headphone jack directly on it. When my kids were really young, I used that feature occasionally when watching movies at night, but I haven't done that in a long time. A quick search shows me they eliminated that feature, but it looks like there's a direct bluetooth headphone mode now. I don't think the cheaper ones have that.

I'd say if you're planning to use Wifi, don't need the Roku to connect directly to headphones, and don't mind a very slight "lag" with the input, you'll probably be happy with the base models. Again, this is all based on older models, so the lag might not even be an issue anymore.
 

Cyforce

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2009
17,176
13,041
113
Des Moines
I own 3 Rokus that are about 4-5 years old, and I'm happy to share my thoughts. For the 2 places that I could easily get a wired ethernet connection to, I went with the Ultra mainly for that reason. I assumed that a wired connection would be more reliable than Wifi - not sure if that's true, but I've never had any issues. I have a much cheaper Roku for upstairs that uses Wifi. It's a little slower to respond to button presses, but it's not a dealbreaker. I think the price difference back then was similar to now, about $100 to $30.

Another thing about the Ultra I liked was that the remote has a headphone jack directly on it. When my kids were really young, I used that feature occasionally when watching movies at night, but I haven't done that in a long time. A quick search shows me they eliminated that feature, but it looks like there's a direct bluetooth headphone mode now. I don't think the cheaper ones have that.

I'd say if you're planning to use Wifi, don't need the Roku to connect directly to headphones, and don't mind a very slight "lag" with the input, you'll probably be happy with the base models. Again, this is all based on older models, so the lag might not even be an issue anymore.
Thank you that’s exactly what I was curious about
 

Cyclonepride

Thought Police
Staff member
Apr 11, 2006
98,781
62,291
113
55
A pineapple under the sea
www.oldschoolradical.com
I own 3 Rokus that are about 4-5 years old, and I'm happy to share my thoughts. For the 2 places that I could easily get a wired ethernet connection to, I went with the Ultra mainly for that reason. I assumed that a wired connection would be more reliable than Wifi - not sure if that's true, but I've never had any issues. I have a much cheaper Roku for upstairs that uses Wifi. It's a little slower to respond to button presses, but it's not a dealbreaker. I think the price difference back then was similar to now, about $100 to $30.

Another thing about the Ultra I liked was that the remote has a headphone jack directly on it. When my kids were really young, I used that feature occasionally when watching movies at night, but I haven't done that in a long time. A quick search shows me they eliminated that feature, but it looks like there's a direct bluetooth headphone mode now. I don't think the cheaper ones have that.

I'd say if you're planning to use Wifi, don't need the Roku to connect directly to headphones, and don't mind a very slight "lag" with the input, you'll probably be happy with the base models. Again, this is all based on older models, so the lag might not even be an issue anymore.
Ours started losing performance at 5-6 years and started making us delete apps to make room for updates on other apps, which is the primary reason why I upgraded our main Roku to Ultra
 

aeroclone

Well-Known Member
Oct 30, 2006
10,354
7,164
113
The Roku Ultra seems to pop up on sale in the 70-80 dollar range a few times per year. Think Prime Days, Black Friday, Cyber Monday. I tend to buy one every couple of years for the main TV, then push the rest down the hand me down path. Main Roku moves to basement, basement to master bedroom, master to guest, and the guest unit gets retired.

Lagging interfaces drive me crazy. I will gladly spend the extra $30-40 to avoid that. Small price to pay for a device I will use daily for the next few years.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Cyclonepride

CyCoug

Well-Known Member
Sep 19, 2021
1,390
2,615
113
50
I have a bottom of the line Roku tv that I bought about 4 years ago for really cheap. It works fine still today. It’s not my main tv but I don’t notice it being slow. It’s TCL, and I’ve found it to be a good value for the price.
 
  • Like
Reactions: enisthemenace

enisthemenace

Well-Known Member
Dec 5, 2009
13,922
10,123
113
Runnells, IA
I have Roku devices all over my house. Roku TVs, a couple Ultras and a couple of sticks, some Ethernet connected and some on WiFi.

I’m sure the Ultras are better than the sticks, but I honestly don’t notice a difference unless have 5-6 TVs going at the same time, and at that point, it’s my internet that starts to struggle to keep up.
 

enisthemenace

Well-Known Member
Dec 5, 2009
13,922
10,123
113
Runnells, IA
I have a bottom of the line Roku tv that I bought about 4 years ago for really cheap. It works fine still today. It’s not my main tv but I don’t notice it being slow. It’s TCL, and I’ve found it to be a good value for the price.
They are great TVs, especially at their price point. TCL is now with Google though, so Roku is making their own TVs these days. Very, very similar to their predecessor TCL Roku TV. Same price point.
 

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,616
24,648
113
The Roku Ultra seems to pop up on sale in the 70-80 dollar range a few times per year. Think Prime Days, Black Friday, Cyber Monday. I tend to buy one every couple of years for the main TV, then push the rest down the hand me down path. Main Roku moves to basement, basement to master bedroom, master to guest, and the guest unit gets retired.

Lagging interfaces drive me crazy. I will gladly spend the extra $30-40 to avoid that. Small price to pay for a device I will use daily for the next few years.

The lagging interface is what made me abandon the sticks in lieu of Ultras on most of my TV’s. I did upgrade to an Apple.tv on my main sports TV as they do swap apps more quickly without having to restart them each time. But Ultras are nice in that you can add a SD card if you run out of space with upgraded apps.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: aeroclone

GTO

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2014
29,296
39,825
113
North DFW, TX
I have a Roku Ultra upstairs and I like it, but downstairs I have a Nvidia Shield and that blows Roku out of the water. Hands down best streaming device I've ever owned (had it for about 5 years now).