That was the right call and Clark doesn't even do any of the weird leg kick outs like we see in men's that draw that call. The defender left zero room for her.I think replay showed Clark came down on the foot of the UConn player.
That was the right call and Clark doesn't even do any of the weird leg kick outs like we see in men's that draw that call. The defender left zero room for her.I think replay showed Clark came down on the foot of the UConn player.
The force is weak within you.Imagine cheering for UConn. Ever.
Degree is from ISU.
I've knocked CC in the past, search the thread.
But to cheer for LSU or UConn?
No way.
Let me ask you, when you saw the play, did you say to yourself, "That was a moving screen." Because I sure didn't see it, after watching the replay for a couple of different angles, it was. But watching it live, I did not think it was a foul. The replay changed my mind, it if takes replay to do that, then it should not be called, I don't care if it was a moving screen or not. You let the players on the court decide the outcome.When you don’t call any obvious foul, that is the exact opposite of letting the players determine the outcome. In this case, the player determined the outcome by fouling.
UCONN had 8 seconds or so when the illegal screen was called a little past half court. The rebound was with 1.3 seconds and at the EIU end of the floor. The odds of getting a decent shot with 1.3 seconds are not nearly as good as with 8 seconds a little behind half court.The biggest play of the game was UConn not boxing out of Clark's missed free throw. They would have been in the exact same position before the illegal screen call had they simply boxed out.
6:03 mark watch Stuelke shes moving the entire time not set. Also it doesn't matter if your feet are shoulder width or "5 feet" apart when it comes to a moving screen.
My first reaction was that it was a foul. But I didn’t see it live. I only saw the replay in full motion first.Let me ask you, when you saw the play, did you say to yourself, "That was a moving screen." Because I sure didn't see it, after watching the replay for a couple of different angles, it was. But watching it live, I did not think it was a foul. The replay changed my mind, it if takes replay to do that, then it should not be called, I don't care if it was a moving screen or not. You let the players on the court decide the outcome.
We had the same discussion in the super bowl, with the eagle's player holding onto the receiver of the Chiefs, sure it was defensive holding, but I would not have called it on the first hold, the second one was, but how many people said it should not have been called at all?
In the end, EIU comes away with a victory that some would say was aided by the refs, if UCONN shoots the ball and misses, no one has that opinion, the call is the story, let it play out, if she makes the shot, then EIU fans are ******** about the moving screen, but we will never know.
They use the NBA rule, they would have gotten to inbound the ball at half court after a timeout. They would have had the chance a great shot.UCONN had 8 seconds or so when the illegal screen was called a little past half court. The rebound was with 1.3 seconds and at the EIU end of the floor. The odds of getting a decent shot with 1.3 seconds are not nearly as good as with 8 seconds a little behind half court.
But apparently since a foul was not called here (when it was not obvious there was one) is the reason there should not have been one called at the end of the game (when it was obvious). Also, we should not call obvious fouls, because the players should decide the game, so they can just foul and get away with it, oh and screw Iowa.There was literally no contact made, at least not from that angle.
Let me ask you, when you saw the play, did you say to yourself, "That was a moving screen." Because I sure didn't see it, after watching the replay for a couple of different angles, it was. But watching it live, I did not think it was a foul. The replay changed my mind, it if takes replay to do that, then it should not be called, I don't care if it was a moving screen or not. You let the players on the court decide the outcome.
We had the same discussion in the super bowl, with the eagle's player holding onto the receiver of the Chiefs, sure it was defensive holding, but I would not have called it on the first hold, the second one was, but how many people said it should not have been called at all?
In the end, EIU comes away with a victory that some would say was aided by the refs, if UCONN shoots the ball and misses, no one has that opinion, the call is the story, let it play out, if she makes the shot, then EIU fans are ******** about the moving screen, but we will never know.
But apparently since a foul was not called here (when it was not obvious there was one) is the reason there should not have been one called at the end of the game (when it was obvious). Also, we should not call obvious fouls, because the players should decide the game, so they can just foul and get away with it, oh and screw Iowa.
I think that is the argument here.
Is that the case on a rebound. I thought it was only on a made basket after a timeout. I don’t watch a lot of women’s basketball, so I don’t really know.They use the NBA rule, they would have gotten to inbound the ball at half court after a timeout. They would have had the chance a great shot.
In this case, it shows the official made the correct call. The foul was a foul, and it was obvious enough that it should have been called even in a critical point in the game.Why are we complaining about replay on a play where replay wasn't used? I agree slow motion replay often makes things look worse and sometimes leads to bad calls, but that's not relevant in this case.
6:03 mark watch Stuelke shes moving the entire time not set. Also it doesn't matter if your feet are shoulder width or "5 feet" apart when it comes to a moving screen.
After any timeout under a minute the ball is advanced.Is that the case on a rebound. I thought it was only on a made basket after a timeout. I don’t watch a lot of women’s basketball, so I don’t really know.