It’s passive aggressive accusation that smears the recipient. It also confirms, “they were told” and he says “KSU staff believe”That's the main 247 guy. And I'm glad I watched this because it's a much different tone (less accusatory) than what his crony posted on the board.
This wasn’t, “there’s some rumors online, but I haven’t heard anything from Tang/staff. “I don’t have evidence, but this is what I was told”
I’m not mad at him, but with things like that, you can’t turn around and act surprised when ISU denies it in the strongest language possible.