Just arrogant as **** too. If they end up taking Oregon and Washington the narrative will be that they "saved" two great college football brands lolThe most pussyfooting murder of a conference EVER.
Just arrogant as **** too. If they end up taking Oregon and Washington the narrative will be that they "saved" two great college football brands lolThe most pussyfooting murder of a conference EVER.
Oh boy do I have a few thoughts on this. The state passed a law last year that homeowners can xeriscape their yards and cities or HOAs can’t stop them. So guess what we did .It should. I watched 60 minutes this past Sunday.
Over building homes in the desert is like building homes on the beach. Sooner or later you are going to run out of water. Just like sooner or later you are going to be hit by a hurricane.
If they can get WAOR on the cheap, then they will take them. If WAOR want the B1G to grovel, then they’ll wait for other options. There are much better options that want and need the B1G.Lol **** the Big 10.
It doesn't solve, but it helps.That doesn't truly solve UConn's football problem and makes all the costs for their other sports explode. The only way they're leaving the Big East, at this point, is to save football. This doesn't do that.
I just don't think it makes sense to add schools for the sake of adding schools at this point. The Big Ten and the SEC are in an advantageous enough position that they can go trophy hunting, like when the Big Ten added USC and UCLA and the SEC added OU and Texas. Even if Oregon and Washington ended up in another conference (that isn't the SEC), the Big Ten would still certainly view them as an expansion target moving forward and them being in the new Big 12 or staying in a new-look Pac 12 wouldn't hinder their interest in one of the top two.Perfect example of the shallow thinking of the “but do they add value?” people.
The calculus should be:
how do we need to be positioned?
how is the SEC going to be positioned?
Are we getting one up on the SEC with these adds even though they may not add “value” right at this second?
do the mascots on the jersey even matter or is it just a magic number?
Are OU/Wash in the hand worth two “ACC schools to possibly be named later” in the bush?
Will this action further crack the ND egg?
Can these adds get us closer to Fox becoming a billion dollar exclusive carrier for the Big 10 in 5-10 years?
And I think first and foremost there is a mindset of “if you aren’t adding, you’re losing and you may not be at the top of the pecking order when the next round comes, and no one knows what the next round looks like, but we do know that there are strength in numbers”
I agree with your overall premise, but you can’t add just for the sake of adding either. The B12 would never add OSU and Wazzou for example. OU/Wash would seem like automatic adds for pretty much any of the P4 though.Perfect example of the shallow thinking of the “but do they add value?” people.
The calculus should be:
how do we need to be positioned?
how is the SEC going to be positioned?
Are we getting one up on the SEC with these adds even though they may not add “value” right at this second?
do the mascots on the jersey even matter or is it just a magic number?
Are OU/Wash in the hand worth two “ACC schools to possibly be named later” in the bush?
Will this action further crack the ND egg?
Can these adds get us closer to Fox becoming a billion dollar exclusive carrier for the Big 10 in 5-10 years?
And I think first and foremost there is a mindset of “if you aren’t adding, you’re losing and you may not be at the top of the pecking order when the next round comes, and no one knows what the next round looks like, but we do know that there are strength in numbers”
They fully interjected themselves back into this mess yesterday only to destabilize and now are again asking someone else to act first.Just arrogant as **** too. If they end up taking Oregon and Washington the narrative will be that they "saved" two great college football brands lol
It's a bummer they know exactly what the competition is offering (ie 31.7M).If they can get WAOR on the cheap, then they will take them. If WAOR want the B1G to grovel, then they’ll wait for other options. There are much better options that want and need the B1G.
Hey everyone, chart guy is back
Are the other three single?I can confirm she is in the picture, that's it.
I just don't think it makes sense to add schools for the sake of adding schools at this point. The Big Ten and the SEC are in an advantageous enough position that they can go trophy hunting, like when the Big Ten added USC and UCLA and the SEC added OU and Texas. Even if Oregon and Washington ended up in another conference (that isn't the SEC), the Big Ten would still certainly view them as an expansion target moving forward and them being in the new Big 12 or staying in a new-look Pac 12 wouldn't hinder their interest in one of the top two.
Oh I get that. I just think the whole "not wanting to kill the PAC or move first narrative" is ******* stupid.If they can get WAOR on the cheap, then they will take them. If WAOR want the B1G to grovel, then they’ll wait for other options. There are much better options that want and need the B1G.
Good catch. I didn't see the 2021$.Isn't the chart showing FY 2021 research dollars? He's comparing the new guys in the Big 12 to the old ones and showing in FY 2021 there wasn't really a difference. I could be wrong but that's what I thought.
Not going to count my chickens until the eggs hatch, but I think the Big 10 news has effectively killed any chance the P12 can survive.
Even if all teams not ORWA agreed to the awful terms in the extremely short window to make a decision (highly unlikely), ORWA won’t sign that deal. The B10 essentially said, if the P12 dies we’ll add you two. So, why in the world would ORWA agree to sign that deal to keep the P12 alive? They just can say, we’re not signing, force the corners to leave, and then skip on to the B10