ESPN, Fox Open Discussions for Next Big 12 Deal

CascadeClone

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2009
10,815
13,863
113
They are saying that is just the media money, not including, bowls, T3, NCAA tourney, adverts, and Playoff money. in everything I saw. Saying it is about 5m more than we are getting now before playoff expansion. So about 50M plus playoff money of 10-15M at the start of the contract. So all in with t3 and playoff 65M +/-

So $65M ALL IN - vs B1G/SEC at $100M/$85M (or whatever is the latest). Feels like that is manageable, really. It's not like ISU isn't already $30-40M behind the upper tiers anyway...

Competitive issues like paying players and eliminating roster limits are still the bigger threat.
 

CascadeClone

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2009
10,815
13,863
113
So the media money from tier 1 is 29mil but the T3, bowls, and tourney money makes up 21? That seems very high to me. The playoff is a total unknown so no way to comment on that but having the rest make up 21mil seems off.

Big12 was getting low $40s last year ALL IN. If the comment of $5M higher for the T1/T2 TV money is accurate, that would be close to $50M.

Agree though, that $21M for the rest of it all seems high. Maybe the CCG isn't in the T1/T2? That's often a separate line item when I have seen it lined out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FriendlySpartan

FriendlySpartan

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2021
9,433
9,889
113
38
Big12 was getting low $40s last year ALL IN. If the comment of $5M higher for the T1/T2 TV money is accurate, that would be close to $50M.

Agree though, that $21M for the rest of it all seems high. Maybe the CCG isn't in the T1/T2? That's often a separate line item when I have seen it lined out.
Yep I deleted that post very quickly. I looked back on the sicem chart and they had the other rights outside of tier one valued at 20 so 21 wasn’t far off at all.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: SteelJ

KnappShack

Well-Known Member
May 26, 2008
23,756
32,050
113
Parts Unknown
So $65M ALL IN - vs B1G/SEC at $100M/$85M (or whatever is the latest). Feels like that is manageable, really. It's not like ISU isn't already $30-40M behind the upper tiers anyway...

Competitive issues like paying players and eliminating roster limits are still the bigger threat.

$65 million?!?

Bring back baseball!!




(Really really ******* kidding)
 
  • Funny
Reactions: CascadeClone

BeachCyclone

Active Member
Jan 22, 2012
89
217
33
Manhattan Beach, CA
^This. I honestly thought I was an outlier. The NFL obviously has the better on field product in terms of player/official quality along with smooth and consistent play. College football is plain wacky, infuriating, and often messy.

But oddly enough, I think the messyness is what makes college football so exciting to me, and you can't beat the atmosphere of college games. The NFL is just too business like, and though it's high quality, it's not as fun to me.
I couldn't agree more. I was at the Chargers-Seahawks game on Sunday, and the contrast between that particular game and any random Big 12 game couldn't be more stark. SoFi is luxurious almost beyond belief but for me it was nothing compared to my last game at Jack Trice (OSU 2021). I was pretty bored most of the time, honestly (although to be fair I was there due to work). Overall, the stadium experience felt a bit like a modern version of watching Roman gladiators.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlaCyclone

2speedy1

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2014
6,601
7,417
113
So $65M ALL IN - vs B1G/SEC at $100M/$85M (or whatever is the latest). Feels like that is manageable, really. It's not like ISU isn't already $30-40M behind the upper tiers anyway...

Competitive issues like paying players and eliminating roster limits are still the bigger threat.
Something like that. Basically the B1G is starting out at 85M all in, or something like that. We would be starting out at like 65M all in or so.

At least that is what I have read. Basically the numbers that have been floated are just the T1/T2 media numbers not the all in numbers with everything plus the expected playoff expansion money. That is why Yormark is optimistic. Because right now they are talking a minimum of a 5M per year per team increase to start, plus any playoff expansion increases.

And with Yormark and his other contacts we could see other revenues increase as well, like Ad revenue etc. being that is his bread and butter.

But in the end its all speculation at this point, I dont think we can trust these media people any more on this than we can on their expansion takes. So who really knows.
 

JM4CY

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 23, 2012
37,797
74,389
113
America
I couldn't agree more. I was at the Chargers-Seahawks game on Sunday, and the contrast between that particular game and any random Big 12 game couldn't be more stark. SoFi is luxurious almost beyond belief but for me it was nothing compared to my last game at Jack Trice (OSU 2021). I was pretty bored most of the time, honestly (although to be fair I was there due to work). Overall, the stadium experience felt a bit like a modern version of watching Roman gladiators.
To be fair though, that OSU game atmosphere was on another level and electric. I mean, in that one, Juicy Wiggle played and nobody gave two sh*ts or even noticed because they were too busy giving the refs every bit of hell they could.
 

SCNCY

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 11, 2009
10,587
8,358
113
37
La Fox, IL
Something like that. Basically the B1G is starting out at 85M all in, or something like that. We would be starting out at like 65M all in or so.

At least that is what I have read. Basically the numbers that have been floated are just the T1/T2 media numbers not the all in numbers with everything plus the expected playoff expansion money. That is why Yormark is optimistic. Because right now they are talking a minimum of a 5M per year per team increase to start, plus any playoff expansion increases.

And with Yormark and his other contacts we could see other revenues increase as well, like Ad revenue etc. being that is his bread and butter.

But in the end its all speculation at this point, I dont think we can trust these media people any more on this than we can on their expansion takes. So who really knows.

That may be for conference sponsors and things (Dr. Pepper Big 12 Football Championship, Phillip 66 Big 12 Men's Basketball Championship), but as far as advertising revenue, I think that is reserved for the TV networks. Also, I am not sure if the Big12 gets a share of TV advertising revenue. I always thought that our media rights were fixed payments; while the TV networks keep all AD revenue (which pays for our fixed payments in addition to production costs). What ever is left over is the TV Networks profits.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthCyde

2speedy1

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2014
6,601
7,417
113
That may be for conference sponsors and things (Dr. Pepper Big 12 Football Championship, Phillip 66 Big 12 Men's Basketball Championship), but as far as advertising revenue, I think that is reserved for the TV networks. Also, I am not sure if the Big12 gets a share of TV advertising revenue. I always thought that our media rights were fixed payments; while the TV networks keep all AD revenue (which pays for our fixed payments in addition to production costs). What ever is left over is the TV Networks profits.
Yes, what I am talking about is sponsorships and/or advertisements that are directly paid to the conference, not on TV, etc.

For instance putting advertisements on the sidelines and around the field at the Big 12 championship and tourney, and on the field and court. Naming it the Dr Pepper Big 12 championship, puting Chevy trucks in the stadium at the game. Phillip 66 Big 12 game of the week. Etc. I think some of that is what goes into the conference Ad and sponsor income. Not advertisements on TV during games, that would all be revenue for the Networks.

As in below (although this doesn't exactly split out the sponsor/ad money exactly Somewhere I have seen a further breakdown):

1666734100819.png
 
  • Informative
Reactions: CascadeClone

CascadeClone

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2009
10,815
13,863
113
That may be for conference sponsors and things (Dr. Pepper Big 12 Football Championship, Phillip 66 Big 12 Men's Basketball Championship), but as far as advertising revenue, I think that is reserved for the TV networks. Also, I am not sure if the Big12 gets a share of TV advertising revenue. I always thought that our media rights were fixed payments; while the TV networks keep all AD revenue (which pays for our fixed payments in addition to production costs). What ever is left over is the TV Networks profits.

You could sell ad space on the uniforms / helmets.

Imagine a "Dr. Pepper" bottle on every players jersey, or "Phillips 66" across the front of every jersey, a la the Premier League. Horrible, yes. But if it got you $10M more per school...
 

BigJCy

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
24,585
21,507
113
Latest from Marchand & Ourand podcast. Marchand hearing Big 12 will get in the $225 million range from ESPN & $135 million range from Fox. Thinks the total will end up $350-$360 million.

Big 12/Pac 12 discussion starts at the 23:30 mark:

 
  • Informative
Reactions: Cyclonepride

jakemcilroy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 26, 2006
1,229
668
113
48
Really solid. Gtes us close to 50m annually, up from 41 this year according to JP. Maybe that extra 9m can buy us a special teams coach.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dr.bannedman

IcSyU

Well-Known Member
Nov 27, 2007
28,277
6,911
113
So that Hilton renovation should be about ready to go then since we have that contract done? Hilton BADLY needs it.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: alarson

jakemcilroy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 26, 2006
1,229
668
113
48
This deal, coupled with the CPF expansion (because it provides access) was THE BEST CASE scenario after OU and Texas left. 15 months later and the leftover Big 12 is in great shape to be the 3rd best conference thanks to Bob Bowlsby and Brett Yormark.
 

Trice

Well-Known Member
Apr 1, 2010
7,310
12,167
113
I'm probably just paranoid and tired of watching these guys carry water for Kliavkoff, but "stability play" feels like a backhanded compliment.

 

shadow

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 11, 2006
1,701
1,486
113
Great news. Yormark is the man! Good deal plus he beat the PAC12 to a deal. LOL at those guys. Also thankful for the new playoff deal with 6 automatic bids which I think was also huge.
 

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,457
24,380
113
So earlier in the week people were throwing around numbers as much as $65m per school. Was this deal that much less, or were there additional revenue sources anticipated (CFP?) with that number?
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron