Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)

WhoISthis

Well-Known Member
Oct 6, 2010
5,620
3,569
113
Dude you are taking things WAAAAYYY too personal. Chill out a bit. Not a single person on here truly knows what's going to happen whether you agree with them or not. Anyone at all (no matter what their thoughts and ideas are) doesn't have any inside information or any clue what will actually happen.

Relax people.

Can’t fault that it is an emotional topic for some, given what’s at stake.

I’m curious as to how much ESPN knows what they’re going to do next. They’ve likely known for months that getting shutout on BIG was possible, if not likely. Maybe they didn’t see USC coming, but I am guessing they knew it possible.

They certainly had a very good idea of being out on BIG when making the 24.5 million offer to PAC. If truly interested in locking down PAC as-is, a better offer would be expected imo, outside the dynamic of not bidding against one’s self.

ESPN without BIG and USC, has budget headroom to take control of what’s left.
 

MJ271

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 9, 2012
2,119
2,730
113
Atkins
I don't see the streamers being able to push too far though, because I don't think they will even be in the ballpark of the ratings the networks get. We have seen the gap in viewership for a team between an ABC or Fox game versus a low tier cable network like FS1. I think the streamers will be even lower than that. The only people watching something like KSU vs TCU on Amazon are fans of those schools and maybe hard-core gamblers. Casual football fans are going to find many interesting games through more mainstream sources before they go digging that far.
I think you're right on viewership. But the value to streamers goes beyond what we think of as the value-generators for typical TV. Streamers should be able to get more value out of a single viewer because that viewer means a dedicated subscription, with advertising that is more personalized (meaning that it's more valuable to advertisers), and some likelihood that the subscriber will use the service outside of just watching sports.

For instance, I don't have Amazon Prime right now. But if Amazon Prime Video had the Big 12's Tier 3 rights, I'd probably subscribe for at least the football and basketball seasons. In that time, chances are that I'd make more purchases on Amazon than I do right now because of the non-streaming benefits.
 

WhoISthis

Well-Known Member
Oct 6, 2010
5,620
3,569
113
It's good for us too. They'll want central time zone content.

Imo it’s hard to see this being good for both, right? Seems inefficient for ESPN to have three middle class conferences.

Why limit a conference to two least profitable time zones, when you could move best of PAC to Big 12?

With this being ESPN, they could try to move some Big 12 west, maybe a few more east, having a PAC and ACC as middle class. Getting OUT free as a perk. The B12 could act as one to block that, make ESPN move PAC to Big 12, but I’m not sure the eastern Big 12 schools wouldn’t want to go east.

It’s harder for the Big 12 to become 3rd conference with ESPN out on BIG. Maybe we’ll have to give up eastern schools in exchange for ESPN making Big 16 or Big 18 and a P4 setup. Better than Big 12 being liquidated to coasts

Of course, if FOX wants a BIG friendly middle class conference if their own, the chance of a Big 16/18 is much better
 

Gorm

With any luck we will be there by Tuesday.
Jul 6, 2010
5,841
2,717
113
Cedar Rapids, IA
If ESPN is completely out of Big Ten including basketball, I can see them making a huge push for the Big 12. Basketball is still important to them as well, and I can see them overpaying for the football product to obtain all of the rights.
 

FriendlySpartan

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2021
9,511
9,998
113
38
I think you're right on viewership. But the value to streamers goes beyond what we think of as the value-generators for typical TV. Streamers should be able to get more value out of a single viewer because that viewer means a dedicated subscription, with advertising that is more personalized (meaning that it's more valuable to advertisers), and some likelihood that the subscriber will use the service outside of just watching sports.

For instance, I don't have Amazon Prime right now. But if Amazon Prime Video had the Big 12's Tier 3 rights, I'd probably subscribe for at least the football and basketball seasons. In that time, chances are that I'd make more purchases on Amazon than I do right now because of the non-streaming benefits.
I totally agree with this reasoning and you are spot on with the added marketing value. Conferences though will be hesitant to pull that trigger becuase the ratings on those streaming games are awful and there was some concern mentioned about making fans pay for another service to watch. It could be an interesting option for the pac who simply needs money but for other conferences streaming is still a risk.
 

cyfan92

Well-Known Member
Sep 20, 2011
8,211
13,081
113
Augusta National Golf Club
Pac-12 extending with ESPN makes more sense now (For ESPN, not the conference). The network knew they lost on the B1G and want exclusive bargaining with the conference.

Makes NO sense for the conference to not take negotiations to the open market....

No matter what, I think it benefits the Big 12 to be 3 time zones and able to start at 11 AM CT and have a BYU, Tech, KSU, or ISU game in the evening
 
  • Agree
Reactions: LLCoolCY

tman24

Well-Known Member
Feb 6, 2008
6,143
1,964
113
Is the CBS and NBC just for their primary channel? cbs still has cbs sports and paramount. NBC still has TNT and peacock. Maybe I am alone but i always felt that we (big 12) were going to be regulated to the secondary channels. and maybe every once and awhile have a high level game make it on a primary channel.
 

drmwevr08

Well-Known Member
Nov 25, 2006
7,593
3,622
113
Arizona
Maybe this is turning in ways not expected but even new B12 games are better for ratings than anything else that a network can put on. Someone will pay. The questions about the Pac may still be valid.
 

SEIOWA CLONE

Well-Known Member
Dec 19, 2018
6,793
6,989
113
63
Is the CBS and NBC just for their primary channel? cbs still has cbs sports and paramount. NBC still has TNT and peacock. Maybe I am alone but i always felt that we (big 12) were going to be regulated to the secondary channels. and maybe every once and awhile have a high level game make it on a primary channel.
CBS is still going to want a noon eastern time zone game, along with a prime time game. Starting P12 games for a noon start mean 9:00 o'clock in the West. But does line up well with a the P12 night game in prime time.

NBC, one would think would like to have a noon and 3:30 games, for when they are not covering ND and one when they are.

ESPN loses the B10 games but picks up the SEC games, along with their current ACC contract, looks like they might also want to continue to pick up a few games from the B12, like they did before. They also want to show a lot of ACC games on the ACC network, which they are paying for.
 
Last edited: