Ohio St gets Big Noon
Michigan gets CBS in the afternoon
USC gets Primetime on NBC
Michigan gets CBS in the afternoon
USC gets Primetime on NBC
Dude you are taking things WAAAAYYY too personal. Chill out a bit. Not a single person on here truly knows what's going to happen whether you agree with them or not. Anyone at all (no matter what their thoughts and ideas are) doesn't have any inside information or any clue what will actually happen.
Relax people.
I think you're right on viewership. But the value to streamers goes beyond what we think of as the value-generators for typical TV. Streamers should be able to get more value out of a single viewer because that viewer means a dedicated subscription, with advertising that is more personalized (meaning that it's more valuable to advertisers), and some likelihood that the subscriber will use the service outside of just watching sports.I don't see the streamers being able to push too far though, because I don't think they will even be in the ballpark of the ratings the networks get. We have seen the gap in viewership for a team between an ABC or Fox game versus a low tier cable network like FS1. I think the streamers will be even lower than that. The only people watching something like KSU vs TCU on Amazon are fans of those schools and maybe hard-core gamblers. Casual football fans are going to find many interesting games through more mainstream sources before they go digging that far.
It's good for us too. They'll want central time zone content.
I totally agree with this reasoning and you are spot on with the added marketing value. Conferences though will be hesitant to pull that trigger becuase the ratings on those streaming games are awful and there was some concern mentioned about making fans pay for another service to watch. It could be an interesting option for the pac who simply needs money but for other conferences streaming is still a risk.I think you're right on viewership. But the value to streamers goes beyond what we think of as the value-generators for typical TV. Streamers should be able to get more value out of a single viewer because that viewer means a dedicated subscription, with advertising that is more personalized (meaning that it's more valuable to advertisers), and some likelihood that the subscriber will use the service outside of just watching sports.
For instance, I don't have Amazon Prime right now. But if Amazon Prime Video had the Big 12's Tier 3 rights, I'd probably subscribe for at least the football and basketball seasons. In that time, chances are that I'd make more purchases on Amazon than I do right now because of the non-streaming benefits.
Yeah, I'm not liking this so far. It's one thing for the B1G to have Fox, but to also have CBS and NBC on board seems like bad news for the Big 12 and Pac 12.I'm starting to worry that the BIG 12 will get screwed in all of this.
Sounds like we're headed to the Ocho.
On crap channels.This means that Fox has a bunch of extra slots they need filled and so does ESPN.
CBS is still going to want a noon eastern time zone game, along with a prime time game. Starting P12 games for a noon start mean 9:00 o'clock in the West. But does line up well with a the P12 night game in prime time.Is the CBS and NBC just for their primary channel? cbs still has cbs sports and paramount. NBC still has TNT and peacock. Maybe I am alone but i always felt that we (big 12) were going to be regulated to the secondary channels. and maybe every once and awhile have a high level game make it on a primary channel.