Die Big 12, Die. Which in german means “The Big 12, the.”
Die Ohio State University
Die Big 12, Die. Which in german means “The Big 12, the.”
Having the players at the table, at least enables the others time to make better decisions.I don't like that. Not worth it. That's what led us to where we are. That isn't a conference. At some point, it won't be good enough, and they'll leave (or at least UT will). Pull off the Band-Aid and let's move forward.
Maybe after a NC, one might think otherwise.No doubt. We're all just guessing. I'd rather put myself in the shoes of the Big 10 to get a better idea of where I think ISU might end up. Unfortunately I can't think of one reason I'd add ISU if I was trying to keep up with the SEC.
??? To be clear, I wasn't asking anyone to post premium info. Just curious if there is info to be found there.
see texas was gonna have the invite all wrapped up for leverage and then get the rest of the b12 to take a non incentive based pay system that would rig the game no matter what, but tamu screwed it all up by leaking, now the big 12 could agree to incentive based tiered payment system which would trickle to other conferences, which the majority of other conference members dont want, or the big 10 can keep equal distributions, pick up old big 8 to stop tiered, send texas to the sec to get clobbered, isu may be in the drivers seat based on what JP decides, hard to believe i know
Finally, a chess player!big 12 is doing exactly what u say, we need to play double agent, u offer texas more publically, base on something like on field performance and ratings, something isu could get to 3rd in if cmc stays, big 10 panics because tosu and others will then want the same thing in next round negotations, so to stop they panic, divorce ou from ut, pick up old big 8, send texas to sec to rot in alabamas sewer, so old big 8 tricks non texas big 12 leftovers to go along, but only to gain leverage to get in big10, and screw texas
Well, assuming that SEC is stopping at 16 with OU and UT. That leaves the assumption that we are headed to 4 conferences of 16 teams. If that's the case PAC 12 will add 4 and B1G will add 2. If you are these 2 conferences who would you go after of the remaining 8 teams in the Big XII or a G5 school? In this scenario Iowa State checks every bylaw. In the footprint, AAU school, etc. Not to mention natural rivals that draw people to the TV.No doubt. We're all just guessing. I'd rather put myself in the shoes of the Big 10 to get a better idea of where I think ISU might end up. Unfortunately I can't think of one reason I'd add ISU if I was trying to keep up with the SEC.
My personal view is the B1G will not rush to add two teams. I think they will be patient. With that said, and realizing I am new to this board, there are posters on here that sound pretty confident in their sources saying OU/UT stay or ISU goes to B1G.
Please don't let the Big 12 give away the store in an attempt to kiss Oklahoma and Texas's asses.
I'm sure they are going to offer them a hell of a deal. Probably smart move business wise but just feels gross.Please don't let the Big 12 give away the store in an attempt to kiss Oklahoma and Texas's asses.
I agree - especially since it is 2 schools from TexasHope we're still exploring our options.
I'd feel differently if it were ALL of the ADs and presidents, not just UT/OU and a select few conference officials.
The only way this could be good is if there is a renegotiated TV contract that gives Texas and OU the $ they want, and at least keeps the other 8 schools at the current amount and hopefully higher. Pretty hard to put the toothpaste back in the tube at this point so we'll see what happens.
Can someone else verify this?That answer would be yes. Join and support CW you won't be disappointed!!!