I don't disagree with anything you said. I completely agree leaders need to take the best data available and make the best decision possible, which I think we both agree is a nearly impossible decision to make. The problems I see:
1. There's a failure in testing which makes good decision-making even more difficult.
2a. There are groups actively working to end mitigation strategies now, including those in positions of power for their own self-interests. Leaders should be actively encouraging people to stay at home, now. Saying people can't stay sheltered in place for months, therefore the mitigation strategies should be ended is completely counter-productive.
2b. Pushing the idea people can't endure under the current circumstances belie the real courage and determination humans have. Londoners existed under the conditions of the Blitz for how long? We can do a lot. The problem is people are only willing to sacrifice to a certain point. That's where our leaders should step in. Encouraging Americans to forge on for the greater good. Sacrifice is easier when its shared.
3. Countries that have had the greatest success combating the virus, generally speaking, have been more pro-active and have populations that have been more compliant, which makes it easier to ease mitigation strategies.
4. I have little confidence leaders in this country will be able to re-institute effective mitigation strategies, if the rate of infection begins to increase again .
My points:
1. We can really slow the spread of the virus. It's not a forgo conclusion X amount of people have to die. The question is a matter of individual sacrifice.
2. Talk of reducing mitigation strategies now is foolish;especially when we don't have the tools or the leadership to keep the virus contained in some lesser form of mitigation