More of a data dump or sharing of information than anything else because I'm not ready to tie out most of these numbers to plausible theories that my eyes have seen.
https://cyclonefanatic.com/2019/02/haaland-lineups-and-more/
Interesting stuff. I was curious about the individual performance across lineups to get some sense of value (or interchangeability) each player has regardless of what lineup. To do this I averaged the OFF, DEF, and EM of each player across all lineups in which they occurred, and then calculated variance to determine the significance or consistency of that average.

Not surprisingly, Babb's offensive efficiency transfers across all lineups in which he plays (he also plays in 8/9 lineups) as supported by the lowest variance. Babb may not average the highest offensive efficiency across lineups, but his presence is very stable offensively. Interestingly, while only present in 3 lineups, Lard also has very high defensive efficiency and very low defensive variance- meaning his defense transfers well regardless of lineup.
Since you play both defense and offense in basketball, the average efficiency margin (with variance bars) of each player across all available lineups in which they occurred is probably a little more practically meaningful than the above. Take a look:
Most people will probably make the hasty conclusion that Jacobson should see less playing time, but I will point out that Jacobson is present in the most defensive efficient lineup (Shayok, Babb, Tyrese, Talen, Jacobson) and the most offensive efficient lineup (Shayok, Babb, Tyrese, Jacobson, Lindell). It just seems like there are some lineups with Jacobson that don't fit or there is some offensive tradeoff with defense (or vice versa).
Lastly, on average all lineups with Babb or Lard have the highest efficiency margin and lowest variance which seems like they are best bets to me and players of the highest value. Also, I wonder why we haven't seem much of the Shayok, Babb, Tyrese, Talen, Lard lineup- maybe that one will be unleashed as a secret weapon at some point.
p.s.
This is small sample size theater so proceed with caution. Another caveat, the variance measurements should be considered proxies not absolutes since I didn't have access to all of the data. Also once could argue that averages should be weighted by % of possessions in which they occur. Take it as you will.