QB- Iowa
RB- ISU
WR/TE- Iowa
OL- Iowa
DL- Iowa
LB- ISU
DB- Iowa
ST- Push
RB- ISU
WR/TE- Iowa
OL- Iowa
DL- Iowa
LB- ISU
DB- Iowa
ST- Push
QB- Iowa
RB- ISU
WR/TE- Iowa
OL- Iowa
DL- Iowa
LB- ISU
DB- Iowa
ST- Push
You must be going off of the stats @rholtgraves used yesterday?
Guess we will see the product on the field.For the most part, except for OL starts. I understand that is the only stat out there to really know what you have coming back but that doesnt say anything about quality.
What part?
QB- Iowa
RB- ISU
WR/TE- Iowa
OL- Iowa
DL- Iowa
LB- ISU
DB- Iowa
ST- Push
QB- Iowa
RB- ISU
WR/TE- Iowa
OL- Iowa
DL- Iowa
LB- ISU
DB- Iowa
ST- Push
QB- Iowa
RB- ISU
WR/TE- Iowa
OL- Iowa
DL- Iowa
LB- ISU
DB- Iowa
ST- Push
I Disagree with WR/TE, DL and DBs
WR/TE = Push
- WR = ISU
- TE = Iowa
DL = TBD
DBs
- CB= ISU
- Safeties = Iowa
I think there are a couple of no doubters.
ISU - RB
Iowa - DL
ISU - LB
Then a few that are closer.
QB - The starters are very close and ISU has a backup that has at least played, however I like Stanley as a team leader and WB so I’d go there.
OL - Too close. An epic push. Iowa’s starting tackles will be great. Maybe the interior average.
DB. Iowa at the safeties and ISU at corner. The bigger edge goes to the starting experience of the ISU corners however, Iowa has recruited really well here and I wouldn’t be surprised if we viewed this differently in six months.
WR/TE. I frankly know little about the ISU wide receivers other than Butler. Iowa TEs are going to abuse people. Incomplete.
ST. Push, although if Iowa can find a way to get a semi competent punter the would have the advantage.