Well for example if.he called everyone a thug that did stupid stuff in bars etc. She probably wouldn't have concluded it to be racially based or discrimanatory.Hmm. Strange way to indirectly avoid that last question.
Well for example if.he called everyone a thug that did stupid stuff in bars etc. She probably wouldn't have concluded it to be racially based or discrimanatory.Hmm. Strange way to indirectly avoid that last question.
She said he had his friend the San Antonio Coach cut her do to retribution for her making a stink and filing a report with The University EOO.Wait so whats the actual lawsuit here? Emotional abuse? To me it just sounds like shes trying to sue him for being racist, which even if it turns out true, isn't a valid reason.
Because at the end of the day there was no discrimination beyond verbal altercations? She was a starter all 4 years, only got suspended for what like 4 games, and got drafted, doesn't seem like discrimination in anyway to me.
She said he had his friend the San Antonio Coach cut her do to retribution for her making a stink and filing a report with The University EOO.
If Fennelly, in fact, negatively affected her WNBA career, Fennelly could owe Moody tens of dollars.
If Fennelly, in fact, negatively affected her WNBA career, Fennelly could owe Moody tens of dollars.
If Fennelly, in fact, negatively affected her WNBA career, Fennelly could owe Moody tens of dollars.
If Fennelly, in fact, negatively affected her WNBA career, Fennelly could owe Moody tens of dollars.
And that's the problem with this. Now, it's spreading across the internet labeling him as racist, without any of the accounts of other former players who are blowing holes in Nikki's story. Just another trial by media.
If Fennelly, in fact, negatively affected her WNBA career, Fennelly could owe Moody tens of dollars.
If Fennelly, in fact, negatively affected her WNBA career, Fennelly could owe Moody tens of dollars.
True. Unfortunately, this is usually driven by insurance companies, on the basis of it being cheaper to settle than to have a prolonged litigation. Many times defendants who want to fight are "encouraged" to settle in order to save money.
Not sure in this case if a loss would mean an insurance company paying, or the University/tax payers.
She said he had his friend the San Antonio Coach cut her do to retribution for her making a stink and filing a report with The University EOO.
I'm sure that coach would put his job on the line to do Bill a favor. Hell, he wouldn't have drafter her in the first place if Bill had badmouthed her. That's just stupid.
He drafted her, Bill said he was a friend, then she filed with the university at which point she was cut shortly after. Considering this is the meat of her case I think it would be difficult to prove unless she was borderline and CBF did call and the SA coach said screw it she isn't worth the trouble. Plausible but hard to prove unless it comes out willingly in deposition.
If Fennelly, in fact, negatively affected her WNBA career, Fennelly could owe Moody tens of dollars.
He drafted her, Bill said he was a friend, then she filed with the university at which point she was cut shortly after. Considering this is the meat of her case I think it would be difficult to prove unless she was borderline and CBF did call and the SA coach said screw it she isn't worth the trouble. Plausible but hard to prove unless it comes out willingly in deposition.
As if we don't have the court of public opinion. I reference this thread if you need proof
Was gonna rep but hmmmm?
Thanks for making the thread worthwhile.
It was funny - but kinda sad as well.