The only bad call all night was the awful pass interference on 3rd down when UNI QB just chucked it into double coverage.
Nope. You're guessing, just like the replay official did. At no point in any angle can you tell conclusively that his knee was down. I can guess that his knee was down, and I'm still 50/50 on whether it was or not, but guessing is not conclusive evidence.There were a couple of camera angles that showed his knee clearly down before the ball left his hand when it was slowed down.
Both calls were correct.
ThisI saw 3 camera angles on TV and a 4th where the play was obscured. None of them were clear enough to change a call on the field, Sage and Blume said as much as well.
Maybe we had a 5th and 6th angle and Cyclones.tv has a more robust TV crew than NFL broadcasts.
Not thisDisagree completely. All calls were correct. There have been times I felt we got the short end on replay but last night everything was correct.
The entire pylon is in bounds. Doesn't matter what side it touches.Here's my questioning of the rule (not the call on the play):
If the ball touches the outside of the pylon first, doesn't that mean that the ball was already out of bounds when it passed the goal line?
This was a blown call. Great coverage and I would tell him to do nothing different. You're going to have a couple clunkers no matter how good the officials are and this was one.I do agree that the refs performed well throughout the night. The only call I remember questioning was the pass interference on Tribune, but I'm biased.
Only if the offense recovers. If the defense recovers they get it at the spot. Fumbling out of the end zone is the same as a defensive recovery so it's not moved back to the spot of the fumble.The wierd part of this rule is if you fumble the ball at say the 50 and it rolls out two yards ahead to the 48 the ball is spotted back at the 50 because u can't advance field position on a fumble. But if you fumble at the 2 and the ball barely clips the pylon (such as last night) it's a touchback and the advancement of the ball is allowed.
And that was definitely the most isu way to fumble. What did we leave on the field, like 14 points last night? Gotta clean that up against iowa
Yes, this is a reviewable play, just like the spot of the ball being reviewable to determine if a first down was made.My officiating question: can the replay official make an "illegal forward pass" call without a flag thrown on he play? (Per the review last night)
Here is the rule...
A ball carrier fumbles the ball within the field of play forward into his opponents end zone and the loose ball then goes out of bounds behind or above his opponent's goal line or is recovered and downed by an opposing player in the end zone. The opposing team would be awarded the touchback.
Notice it says within field of play.. Ball was not in field of play.
This call is the worst rule in football history. No matter who it goes against. What I don't get is I undertand if ball goes out of back of endzone within field of play but ball hit pylon on out of bounds side...ball was not in field of play when it left his hands.
Nope. You're guessing, just like the replay official did. At no point in any angle can you tell conclusively that his knee was down. I can guess that his knee was down, and I'm still 50/50 on whether it was or not, but guessing is not conclusive evidence.
How was the ball not in the field of play? Pylon is in bounds.
How was the ball not in the field of play? Pylon is in bounds.
The pylon is out of bounds.
Were you at the game? I am telling you right now, there was video of this being the correct call on the big screen. It was clear as day. If they did not have this feed on TV they need to fix something but it was clear.
There is a core contradiction that if you fumble the ball out of bounds you get to keep the ball. If you fumble it out of bounds in the end zone the other team gets it. Theoretically fumbling it out of bounds in the end zone means you've bested your opponent MORE than fumbling it out of bounds somewhere else.
Is this some kind of metaphysical pylon? It both exists and doesn't exist.What if it's both???
On TV they showed multiple views and 100% the call should not have been reversed. It was at least 3 views they showed on TV. It was a bad call. The knee goes down and the ball is released at the exact same time, play on the field should stand every time if an official does his job correctly.
Replay review in general should just change the rule. The rule should be that they just try to get the call right based on replay. They very rarely follow the correct procedure that the play on the field stands if there isn't conclusive evidence.
I thought Sam looked down on the 3rd down conversion also.