This is 100% the talking point. The MLBPA is gonna denounce something it agreed on? That's just bad form.
No one **** their legs over Trout, over Stanton, over Harper, or anyone else. Boras is the only ******* reason this thing is a story.
This is 100% the talking point. The MLBPA is gonna denounce something it agreed on? That's just bad form.
Absolutely the right call on Bryant. People who argue otherwise are just being silly.
People that have huge expectations for the team this year are setting themselves up for disappointment anyway. The future is near, but I'm not sure that this year is the year.They were talking about this on Murph and Andy yesterday. Of course Andy, the Cardinal fan thought it was dumb of the Cubs not to put their best team on the field for opening day.
They also had "Cubs fans" call in and say they were disappointed that the Cubs aren't doing everything they can to "WIN NOW".
Holy crap, it's two weeks of a 162 game season.
The Cubs historically have done stupid crap like bringing guys up early, or giving guys huge deals who haven't earned it (Felix Pie). On top of the terrible free agent signings.
The Cubs are doing the ABSOLUTE right thing and preserving and entire year of club control for 2 weeks of games this year. If they did the opposite then any fan with a brain would be ticked as hell.
I'm not positive that the pitching rotation is good enough to win a ton of games this year anyways. The bats are talented but still very young and will need to learn to play together and learn how to be big leaguers.
I am super pumped for the season but people are crapping their pants a little too much about each little move.
People that have huge expectations for the team this year are setting themselves up for disappointment anyway. The future is near, but I'm not sure that this year is the year.
If we are able to point back at the first two weeks of the season and say, "if Bryant would have been playing we could have made the playoffs" I'll be content with how the season went.
$20 million could be conservative. I guess it's easy to say he'll make enough during his career when it isn't our $20-$30 million being left on the table
Bad rule for the clubs and players
he's not leaving 20 million on the table anyway, that's not how this works. He'll be super-2 arbitration eligible. Check out what some other big name players got in their final year of arbitration. He'll get his 20 million if he lives up to the hype.
The difference is the money isn't guaranteed
They were talking about this on Murph and Andy yesterday. Of course Andy, the Cardinal fan thought it was dumb of the Cubs not to put their best team on the field for opening day.
They also had "Cubs fans" call in and say they were disappointed that the Cubs aren't doing everything they can to "WIN NOW".
Holy crap, it's two weeks of a 162 game season.
The Cubs historically have done stupid crap like bringing guys up early, or giving guys huge deals who haven't earned it (Felix Pie). On top of the terrible free agent signings.
The Cubs are doing the ABSOLUTE right thing and preserving and entire year of club control for 2 weeks of games this year. If they did the opposite then any fan with a brain would be ticked as hell.
I'm not positive that the pitching rotation is good enough to win a ton of games this year anyways. The bats are talented but still very young and will need to learn to play together and learn how to be big leaguers.
Pretty big difference. Still a bad rule. Bad for the teams and players. MLB and the union need to take a look at this one.
The Cubs never have (ok, since like 1908) and never will win a World Series. Why would you root for a team that NEVER wins?
The Cubs never have (ok, since like 1908) and never will win a World Series. Why would you root for a team that NEVER wins?
You sound like a Hawkeye fan when questioning why people cheer for ISU.
Why do you root for ISU football?
I think that's the point. Stay out of a Cubs thread if you aren't a Cubs fan. Not too hardSound like a Hawkeye fan? That's an insult
The 2 teams really aren't comparable.