Who is Iowa State's GOAT MBB player?

Whose was better?

  • Barry Stevens

    Votes: 13 72.2%
  • Dedric Willoughby

    Votes: 5 27.8%

  • Total voters
    18
  • Poll closed .

im4cyclones

Well-Known Member
Jun 14, 2010
3,937
671
113
Ames, IA
You lose points in my book by turning pro early. Sure they are good for mostly for themselves which eliminates Fizer & Royce White, what dude was her for 1 season.

With history on his side. Hoiberg has to be the man. Especially when you add his coaching, no single person has been involved in more success.

I was here for Grayer, the end of Hornacek, Victor was a stud. Hoiberg is my guy though.

Horny had the best pro career but he was only a walk on... not sure how many games/points he has his first several seasons. Fred was the ball boy when i was here and we knew he could ball back in 7th grade.

So its Fred but damn was Tinsley fun to watch & win with. Remember dude never lost a game at Hilton, nobody else can say it but he only played 2 years.... So its Fred

So the greatest of all time cannot be good enough to turn pro early? How "great" could they really be? Good thing you aren't a fan of a true blue-blood program. Can't imagine your list of the great Kentucky players.
 

Cyinthenorth

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 29, 2013
15,887
11,970
113
36
Dubuque
Been an active, comprehending fan only since 1998 or so (I was 9 and just starting to take interest in the game) so undoubtedly my list will exclude some of the greats from the Johnny Orr days and beyond. I'll take care to include a few names that I constantly hear get tossed around here on CF, but I can't promise my list will include all of the old timers:

1. Fizer (responsible for sparking my interest in the game)
2. Grayer (never saw him at ISU, but all-time scoring leader)
3. Hoiberg (Don't remember his playing days too well, but numbers speak for themselves, plus he's the Mayor)
4. Hornacek (Obviously knew him more as a member of the Jazz)
5. Tinsley (Best PG in program history IMO)
6. White (cornerstone in turning program around)
7. Ejim (First Team All Big 12 and 2014 POY)
8. Willoughby (one of the first great players I remember at ISU)
9. Brackins (great player lost in a dark time)
10. Garrett (see Brackins)
11. Cato (see Willoughby)
12. Alexander (just to round out my list)
 
L

LincolnWay187

Guest
I love the three point shot. That and my age of when I started watching probably influence my picks(94-95). That said....

1. Hoiberg
2. Fizer
3. Royce White
4. Tinsley
5. Dedric
6. Cato
7. Hurl Beechum
8. Tyrus
9. Jake Sullivan
10. Babb
11. Kane
12. Hornacek

My honorable mentions: Julius, Kenny Pratt, and Clyburn
 
Last edited by a moderator:

inCyteful

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Feb 28, 2012
12,550
12,627
113
Fort Collins, CO
1) Jeff Grayer
2) Marcus Fizer
3) Jeff Hornacek
4) Fred Hoiberg
5) Gary Thompson
6) Jamaal Tinsley
7) Melvin Ejim
8) Zaid Abdul-Aziz
9) Barry Stevens
10) Dean Uthoff
11) Loren Meyer
12) Victor Alexander

Morris and Niang will be on this list eventually.
 

inCyteful

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Feb 28, 2012
12,550
12,627
113
Fort Collins, CO
I love the three point shot. That and my age of when I started watching probably influence my picks(94-95). That said....

1. Hoiberg
2. Fizer
3. Royce White
4. Tinsley
5. Dedric
6. Cato
7. Hurl Beechum
8. Tyrus
9. Jake Sullivan
10. Babb
11. Kane
12. Hornacek

Ah, Jake, I may have to rethink my list.
 

AMarner32

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2013
2,244
37
48
28
Zaid played against different competition. Different time, different game, different officiating, and especially different *ahem non-existent ahem* weight-lifting regimens. I tend to severely discount accomplishments of far yesteryear because the game was being dominated by men taking advantage of playing against frail pasties night in and night out.

Additionally, rebounding numbers are inflated by a by-gone era. See: http://www.encyclonepedia.com/?p=3344#more-3344

Old codgers, feel free to lose your $hit at that notion, but it's true.

Fizer was an undersized (6'7" maybe) power forward who physically imposed his will against taller, more physically-able players. I am positive the talent Zaid played against paled in comparison to Fizer's competition.
In twenty years we will look back at the talent Fizer played against and laugh at how weak it was. Athletes keep getting better. Teams keep getting better. The only way to compare players from different generations is how they fared against the competition of their own time. You talk about how nobody had weight-lifting regimens, but that also affects Zaid. He wasn't lifting frequently either, so the disadvantage those other players had was also a disadvantage for Zaid.
 

cyclone101

Well-Known Member
Oct 19, 2009
4,565
4,295
113
Dez Moinz
In twenty years we will look back at the talent Fizer played against and laugh at how weak it was. Athletes keep getting better. Teams keep getting better. The only way to compare players from different generations is how they fared against the competition of their own time. You talk about how nobody had weight-lifting regimens, but that also affects Zaid. He wasn't lifting frequently either, so the disadvantage those other players had was also a disadvantage for Zaid.
Thank you!
 

VeloClone

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2010
48,335
39,102
113
Brooklyn Park, MN
People talk about Grayer's scoring record but don't seem to give him credit for anything else. Keep in mind that he was all Big 8 three years but was also on the Big 8 all defensive team all four years. He was much more than a scorer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iamntx

CyberJJJ

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 19, 2006
4,051
3,333
113
Johnston, IA
People talk about Grayer's scoring record but don't seem to give him credit for anything else. Keep in mind that he was all Big 8 three years but was also on the Big 8 all defensive team all four years. He was much more than a scorer.

3 things stand out as I reflect back on the Grayer years.

1st, I was in Hilton the night Grayer came for his recruiting visit. If I remember correctly, Gary Thompkins was there the same night. Johnny stopped by they student section and asked us to welcome him when he came in. We even got to go talk with him at half time. He was so introverted!

2nd, I remember him hitting a HUGE jumper that put us over the top against a pretty good Drake team early in his Freshman year. We knew he was going to be a good one.

3rd, we were playing Nebby and it looked like one of their players was trying to provoke a fight with Hornacek to get him out of the game and Grayer stepped in and took care of business.
 

CyberJJJ

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 19, 2006
4,051
3,333
113
Johnston, IA
First, I think you start with the All Century Team. http://www.cyclones.com/ViewArticle.dbml?ATCLID=875571 For those of you who don't remember that, it was announced in the 2007-2008 season. They gave an automatic nod to the 7 All American's up to that point, and going by that standard, excluding academic All Americans, you would have to give and automatic bid to Melvin Ejim and Deandre Kane who were 2nd and 3rd team last year. Monte and Georges have a shot at that going forward. There were some older guys on that list that few in this thread haven't mentioned or likley even knew anything about. If you consider that auto qualification, what two would you bump off the All Century team to replace with them? I would likely drop Jake Sullivan, even though he is one of my all-time favorite competitors as a Cyclone. After that it gets tougher, but I would probably drop Cato, but again a player I loved to watch. He was a true rim protector like we haven't seen for a long time until what we are seeing with McKay.
 

CoKane

Well-Known Member
Oct 26, 2013
18,196
11,885
113
Cedar Rapids
I'm just going to go with the first 12 names that pop into my head

Hoiberg
White
Kane
Ejim
Fizer
Tinsley
Hornacek
Abdul-Aziz
Meyer
Grayer
Stevens
Georges(because why the **** not?)


And although I didn't put them on the list, we will tell younger generations about guys like Morris, Scotty, Naz, and Babb too. I didn't think they were good enough to go on the list but I don't think they'll be swept under the rug and forgotten about either
 

Malone

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 7, 2010
2,919
5,352
113
Des Moines
In twenty years we will look back at the talent Fizer played against and laugh at how weak it was. Athletes keep getting better. Teams keep getting better. The only way to compare players from different generations is how they fared against the competition of their own time. You talk about how nobody had weight-lifting regimens, but that also affects Zaid. He wasn't lifting frequently either, so the disadvantage those other players had was also a disadvantage for Zaid.

I'll make it really simple: in a game between players 40 years ago and those of Fizer's college days, who would win? Simpler yet, the two played the same position; who would win a one-on-one game? Who would fare better against today's competition? Those are questions we can confidently answer without speculation.

The question was "Who is Iowa State's GOAT MBB player?", not "Who is Iowa State's GOAT MBB player, handicapping for a bygone era?" By today's standards, today's players are better. And yes, they'll be better 20 years from now.
 

CyberJJJ

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 19, 2006
4,051
3,333
113
Johnston, IA
People talk about Grayer's scoring record but don't seem to give him credit for anything else. Keep in mind that he was all Big 8 three years but was also on the Big 8 all defensive team all four years. He was much more than a scorer.

The old Big 8 was stacked that year with talent. Danny Manning, who NEVER won a game in Hilton as a player, was player of the year in all of college basketball that year, and the 1st team All Big Eight included:

Jeff Grayer ISU
Mitch Richmond K-State (also 1st team all American)
Harvey Grant Oklahoma
Derrick Chievous Missouri
 

CyberJJJ

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 19, 2006
4,051
3,333
113
Johnston, IA
I'll make it really simple: in a game between players 40 years ago and those of Fizer's college days, who would win? Simpler yet, the two played the same position; who would win a one-on-one game? Who would fare better against today's competition? Those are questions we can confidently answer without speculation.

The question was "Who is Iowa State's GOAT MBB player?", not "Who is Iowa State's GOAT MBB player, handicapping for a bygone era?" By today's standards, today's players are better. And yes, they'll be better 20 years from now.

I get PART of what you are saying. Big men didn't used to have the type of guard skills Georges brings to the table. Without the three point shooting line years back, few big men ever took deep outside shots so didn't develop the outside shooting skills valued today. Having said that, Barry Stevens used to back up to get open even before the 3 point line was added! He would have been a perfect wing in Fred's system (I remember Oklahoma coach Tubbs asying "All we saw was the seat of #35's shorts.") While we didn't have the weight lifting programs years ago, the mental make-up it took Don Smith (Abdul-Aziz) to lead the league in rebounding 3 years in a row would likely make him enough of a competitor to be successful today. Certainly Fizer dates back many years, but put his college body on the court today and he would still be dominant ( I will NEVER forget his posterizing Dwayne Schintzius...heh, we knew even back then that mullets should be outlawed!). Fizer didn't have Royce's handles, but he had a better jumper/fade away.
 
Last edited:

cyclone101

Well-Known Member
Oct 19, 2009
4,565
4,295
113
Dez Moinz
I'll make it really simple: in a game between players 40 years ago and those of Fizer's college days, who would win? Simpler yet, the two played the same position; who would win a one-on-one game? Who would fare better against today's competition? Those are questions we can confidently answer without speculation.

The question was "Who is Iowa State's GOAT MBB player?", not "Who is Iowa State's GOAT MBB player, handicapping for a bygone era?" By today's standards, today's players are better. And yes, they'll be better 20 years from now.
Stats are facts whether you want to accept them or not that's up to you. Since you refused to talk about my Babe Ruth example because it's baseball, would you rather talk about Wilt Chamberlain? Is he not one of the Greatest Players of All Time just because he played in the 50s and had weaker competition? How about Jordan? Maravich?

To say a player can't be an All-Time great just because he played in a different era is ignorant. Anyway, I love this discussion. Much better than whether or not Matt Thomas can shoot threes.
 

Malone

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 7, 2010
2,919
5,352
113
Des Moines
Stats are facts whether you want to accept them or not that's up to you. Since you refused to talk about my Babe Ruth example because it's baseball, would you rather talk about Wilt Chamberlain? Is he not one of the Greatest Players of All Time just because he played in the 50s and had weaker competition? How about Jordan? Maravich?

To say a player can't be an All-Time great just because he played in a different era is ignorant. Anyway, I love this discussion. Much better than whether or not Matt Thomas can shoot threes.

I will grant you that Wilt is a freak that transcends generations. He was a taller, better Amare Stoudemire. But I really do believe that a lot of the players from that era wouldn't hold up as greats playing with today's generation.

Zaid is an ISU great for what he accomplished and I'm not trying to take that away. But I cannot be convinced that, in general, players from the 50s/60s are in the same class as those from the 90s and today, let alone better.
 

CTTB78

Well-Known Member
Apr 7, 2006
9,540
4,518
113
1. Jeff Grayer
2. Fred Hoiberg
3. Jeff Hornacek
4. Barry Stevens
5. Marcus Fizer
6. Jamaal Tinsley
7. Dedric Willoughby
8. Justus Thigpen
9. Victor Alexander
10. Georges Niang
11. Royce White
12. Gary Thompson

Pretty good list, but I would go with Smith over Big Vic.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron