Yes, we're better off than in the Mac years, but it's not by a huge margin from an appearance standpoint, that is Ws and Ls. When you look closely, I think we're clearly better off in a number of areas. I think we're getting more legit players, but the playing field is definitely tougher than what Mac ever faced. Fan support and booster support is miles better.
God love him but Mac had a discernably easier schedule, as has been noted, and really couldn't get over the hump. The Big12 North was there for the picking, in the palm of his hand in 2004 and 2005, and Mac choked time and time again. He had the chance to be the man to end the Pinkel era in its tracks in 2005 and he peed down his leg. That 2005 team should have won 10 games, but somehow only managed to win 7. It would have faced the Vince Young led Texas team in the Big12 championship, but it should have finished in the Top10 with at most two losses. Mac was a great guy to get us up from laughingstock status but he wasn't going to take us higher. He was a salesman whose customer base had bought the mediocre product and could see it was getting worse and were balking at buying more.
Facilities are much better, overall team speed is better. We haven't had QBs as good as Seneca, Sage and Meyer so far under Rhoads, but most other position groups have been as good or marginally better. I think the QB and WR spots have been sub-standard to our level competition, and RB only be average, so it's really put a damper on our production. WR is poised to really move beyond anything Mac had and the RB is arguably a push. However, I think the defense has been solid but not spectacular in the Nintendo-esque era of the Big12, probably a step above what Mac was putting out there, particularly in terms of athletically.
I think the coaching has been better on the defensive side and the offensively it's a push, given our well-documented woes under both Herman and now Messingham. Special teams is largely a push, with both being marginal (2011 and 2012 Kirby aside).