Tree of Life. Critically acclaimed, artsy fartsy piece of acid trip induced ****.
Would be interesting to see what people think is Tarantino's most violent film. One could argue the ear cutting off scene in RD is the most violent thing he's ever put on screen. The accidental blowing off of a kids head in the car in PF which in turn shows brains in Sam Jackson's hair. Killing for sport in Death Proof. Do you base violence on how much blood is spilled? How many deaths there are? Or more the act going on itself? If someone asked me the most violent scenes in any Tarantino written movie, my top two would be the ear in RD and the hotel scene in True Romance. Which might be odd to some because Kill Bill, IB, and DU all have bloodbaths.
So must have an issue with reality and how violence towards women has been a fact of life for eons in almost every culture. I understand your point, but it's not like his concepts are unfounded.My two cents on Tarantino...
I think he is an exceptionally talented filmmaker with a gift for engaging his audiences and telling a story, but there are two things that I personally dislike about him and his movies.
1) His personality; I've read interviews and stories with and about him where he comes off as a ginormous, entitled, arrogant d-bag and is remarkably unlikeable.
2) The level of misogynistic violence towards women in his movies. Now, I do know that he has featured some strong, kick-*** female characters in his movies, like the Bride in the KB movies and the trio of female heroines in "Death Proof", but I also feel that some of his violence towards women in some other movies (like Inglorious Basterds) is completely gratutious and unneccessary.
At the risk of sounding sanctimonious and self-righteous I like to think I have a pretty strong sense of chivalry, so it's always disturbed me, regardless of who the director is, to see violence against women in movies and TV, especially if I feel it's unnecessary to the plot/story.
My two cents on Tarantino...
I think he is an exceptionally talented filmmaker with a gift for engaging his audiences and telling a story, but there are two things that I personally dislike about him and his movies.
1) His personality; I've read interviews and stories with and about him where he comes off as a ginormous, entitled, arrogant d-bag and is remarkably unlikeable.
2) The level of misogynistic violence towards women in his movies. Now, I do know that he has featured some strong, kick-*** female characters in his movies, like the Bride in the KB movies and the trio of female heroines in "Death Proof", but I also feel that some of his violence towards women in some other movies (like Inglorious Basterds) is completely gratutious and unneccessary.
At the risk of sounding sanctimonious and self-righteous I like to think I have a pretty strong sense of chivalry, so it's always disturbed me, regardless of who the director is, to see violence against women in movies and TV, especially if I feel it's unnecessary to the plot/story.
So must have an issue with reality and how violence towards women has been a fact of life for eons in almost every culture. I understand your point, but it's not like his concepts are unfounded.
My two cents on Tarantino...
I think he is an exceptionally talented filmmaker with a gift for engaging his audiences and telling a story, but there are two things that I personally dislike about him and his movies.
1) His personality; I've read interviews and stories with and about him where he comes off as a ginormous, entitled, arrogant d-bag and is remarkably unlikeable.
2) The level of misogynistic violence towards women in his movies. Now, I do know that he has featured some strong, kick-*** female characters in his movies, like the Bride in the KB movies and the trio of female heroines in "Death Proof", but I also feel that some of his violence towards women in some other movies (like Inglorious Basterds) is completely gratuitous and unnecessary.
At the risk of sounding sanctimonious and self-righteous I like to think I have a pretty strong sense of chivalry, so it's always disturbed me, regardless of who the director is, to see violence against women in movies and TV, especially if I feel it's unnecessary to the plot/story.
Others can make man card jokes if they want, but I just finished the book this weekend and enjoyed it WAY more than I thought I would. I started it because it came pre-loaded when I downloaded the Kindle App for my laptop and hadn't decided on a new book to buy and start reading. Once I got into the rhythm of the writing I got hooked a lot quicker than I expected.
I know Im late, but anyone who says Star Wars is overrated (especially the first trilogy) should be perma banned from this site.
I wasn't thinking that, and I do see where you're coming from on this. I just think on these recent movies he's made these stylistic choices and I know that going in so I try to judge the rest of the movie in that framework. And to be honest if he spends the next 20 years making only excessively gory movies that are homages to some genre I'll be right there saying "Yo QT, dial it back a bit".I would get killing the main members of the family, and Samuel L. Jackson for ratting him out, even the one farm hand - but hundreds of unrelated plantation workers who were likely only billed as "guy #174 who Django shot," because that's literally the only scene they were in? It's just not adding to the story to have it be that over-the-top.
I think you think that I hate QT, and I don't - I think he's supremely talented, and just ruining his own films with this ridiculousness.
On the otherhand, the prequels can't be called overated, because everyone knows they suck.
I feel like Tarantino is a pretty equal opportunity guy when it comes to violence.My two cents on Tarantino...
I think he is an exceptionally talented filmmaker with a gift for engaging his audiences and telling a story, but there are two things that I personally dislike about him and his movies.
1) His personality; I've read interviews and stories with and about him where he comes off as a ginormous, entitled, arrogant d-bag and is remarkably unlikeable.
2) The level of misogynistic violence towards women in his movies. Now, I do know that he has featured some strong, kick-*** female characters in his movies, like the Bride in the KB movies and the trio of female heroines in "Death Proof", but I also feel that some of his violence towards women in some other movies (like Inglorious Basterds) is completely gratutious and unneccessary.
At the risk of sounding sanctimonious and self-righteous I like to think I have a pretty strong sense of chivalry, so it's always disturbed me, regardless of who the director is, to see violence against women in movies and TV, especially if I feel it's unnecessary to the plot/story.
Was it me or was Avatar just an alien version of Dances with Wolves. Very similar story-lines I thought.
#1 most certainly sucks.hey dont necessarily "suck" but they arent very good.
Pocahontas was always the one I heard.