Big 12 should drop championship game

uro cy

Well-Known Member
Oct 28, 2006
3,561
239
63
1. Why is that a rule?

2. Does that mean 12 team conferences "have" to play a champ game?

3. If nothing else, if you don't have a champ game, you should be required to play your last conference game the week of the champ games.

If you are expecting some sort of logical answers to these questions, remember you are dealing with the NCAA...(see: Lucca decision for further evidence)
 

hawkeye_t

Member
Apr 24, 2006
310
7
18
47
ID via PA via ME via IA
Or maybe limit them to 1 conference team in the BCS. Say OSU and Innanoy( the top 2 teams in the Big 10), had to play each other this weekend again. No matter who wins, the loser would'nt get an invite to a BCS bowl. OSU gets kicked outtat the NC or Illinois outta the Rose.

The way things are they just sit back and wait for everyone else to fall.

By that logic, KU should not get to the BCS because they are just sitting back, never having played OU and waiting. Obviously the Big Ten sucked this year, but the system is the system. There can not be three teams from any conference. The Big 12 does not have to play a title game, they just choose to take multiple millions of $'s to do so.

In response to another post about no national championship game participant being in that game without playing in a title game, how about the Pac 10? They play every team during the regular season. Why should they have to play a title game just so the conference can get a big check?

This is the system we have. In my opinion, the thing that makes college football the best sport in the world is the debate, the regular season, the semi-finals that took place today, etc. This was intense, exciting football.
 

Wesley

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
70,923
546
113
Omaha
Stoops need the game to be played so he can win and then lose to Boise State.
 

Enginerd

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
3,184
167
63
I remember Mac saying the coaches voted 12-0 not to play the game, the university presidents voted 12-0 to have the game. I understand they make large sums of money off the game, but what does it cost when a team gets knocked out of a BCS bowl? Either every BCS conference need to play one or none of them should.

I do not believe that is true. I believe there was one dissenter against the championship game and it was Nubbraska. Makes sense if you think about it. They were the king of the hill when the Big 12 was formed.

I just think the system should be tweaked so that if you don't win your conference in a conference championship game, whether or not your conference has one, you cannot play in the BCS Championship game. A psuedo playoff if you will. That will just accelerate the Big Televen's evolution to Ivy League status.
 

theshadow

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2006
19,997
19,668
113
I'd argue that the Pac 10 is fine as-is, and there hasn't been much of an argument against them getting to the title games.


That's because the Pac-10 has gone to a full round-robin conference schedule (9 games) since the 12th game was added. Everybody plays everybody to determine a conference champion.
 

Cyclone62

Well-Known Member
Feb 1, 2007
9,115
213
63
Oldpeopleville
I do not believe that is true. I believe there was one dissenter against the championship game and it was Nubbraska. Makes sense if you think about it. They were the king of the hill when the Big 12 was formed.

I just think the system should be tweaked so that if you don't win your conference in a conference championship game, whether or not your conference has one, you cannot play in the BCS Championship game. A psuedo playoff if you will. That will just accelerate the Big Televen's evolution to Ivy League status.

How would it be any different than the way it is now? Unless you mean a champ game is required before being in the NC game, but then the Pac 10 has a legitimate reason for getting around that.
 

twojman

Well-Known Member
Jun 1, 2006
7,770
3,954
113
Clive
Pac 10 did it right by playing everyone. Conferences without a championship game should only be allowed one BCS team as long as this crap system exsists. A playoff would solve a lot of the problems.
 

Enginerd

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
3,184
167
63
How would it be any different than the way it is now?

Any conference that does not play a championship game is not eligible to play for a national championship.

Conference championship games are a good thing. Conferences that celebrate three and four way ties for first place are not. I really don't know why the Big Televen even plays one conference game. Just play the MAC all year and then everyone wins by tying for first with a 0-0 conference record.
 

peachy

Active Member
Oct 14, 2006
256
84
28
I do not believe that is true. I believe there was one dissenter against the championship game and it was Nubbraska. Makes sense if you think about it. They were the king of the hill when the Big 12 was formed.

I just think the system should be tweaked so that if you don't win your conference in a conference championship game, whether or not your conference has one, you cannot play in the BCS Championship game. A psuedo playoff if you will. That will just accelerate the Big Televen's evolution to Ivy League status.

Take that even one step further. There should be a mandatory rule stating "You can't play in the National Title game unless you win your conference." Period. Georgia, in the title game? Heck, they didn'y even make their conference championship, let alone make it to the title game. OSU? Well, at least they are the conference champ. There should also be another rule, if your conference does not have a title game, and there is a tie, there should be a +1 game. For example, if 2 teams go undefeated in the B10, and they do not play each other during the regular season, they must play an extra game at the end of the season to determine who the champ is.

I looked at Georgia's schedule. They lost to Tennessee, who just got beat by LSU. They also lost to S. Carolina, who just lost 5 straight games to end the season. Does anyone really believe Georgia should be in the title game over LSU? Seriously, Georgia in the title game makes me mad, what a joke. YOU SHOULD HAVE TO WIN YOUR CONFERENCE TO PLAY FOR A FREAKIN NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

Enginerd

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
3,184
167
63
As I noted earlier, the Big 10 can't play a conference title until they add a 12 team, per NCAA rules.

Do they have a rule preventing all Big Televen teams from playing one another each season?

If I were a voter I would penalize OSU. OSU's resume isn't much better than KU's.
 

ISUFan22

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
33,922
904
113
Denver, CO
Yeah, I saw it.

Perplexed why this upsets you so, to the extent of taking swipes at others tonight (as I mentioned in another thread).

It's a mess, we could see it coming. The system is what it is - flawed.

But it's not OSU's fault they're going to back in. Blame it on the system and mostly all the teams that choked ahead of them.
 

Wesley

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
70,923
546
113
Omaha
I blame Chase Daniel. He flunked his Heisman Test tonight. Now Tebow will get the trophy.
 

Enginerd

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
3,184
167
63
So any Pac 10 team should be barred from the NC because they don't have a champ game even though they play everyone in their conference?

Tough call. If I had to decide, yes. It's the closest thing we will ever get to a playoff. Everyone have championship games and then take the top four for a two and one. Realistically, I would be O.K. with at least everyone playing each other in their conference. Jeesh. I thought this was the internet and we could dare to dream.
 

ISUFan22

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
33,922
904
113
Denver, CO
Are you talking about a playoff system where every winner of a conference title game gets in and that's it?

I could be on board with this.

Then again, you could have a team that goes undefeated all season, loses a close one in the conference title game to another very good team and get completely left out of the playoff system.
 

Enginerd

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
3,184
167
63
Yeah, I saw it.

Perplexed why this upsets you so, to the extent of taking swipes at others tonight (as I mentioned in another thread).

It's a mess, we could see it coming. The system is what it is - flawed.

But it's not OSU's fault they're going to back in. Blame it on the system and mostly all the teams that choked ahead of them.

What is it with you and "snipes" tonight? When someone gives me a little crap I just assume they are having fun and joking. I guess you assume the opposite. Trust me, every post I make is with a smile. We are all Clones bra. I hate the Big Televen and that includes OSU. i agree it's the system and it gives them a free pass. OU would roll OSU. OSU could not win a Big 12 Division.
 

Cyclone62

Well-Known Member
Feb 1, 2007
9,115
213
63
Oldpeopleville
Enginerd, basically, this entire argument boils down to the way the Big Televen does things vs. everyone else. Pac 10 is fine since everyone plays everyone, the BT isn't because they don't. However, even with the BT champ game, would anyone be happy with tOSU in the title game?
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron