I'd be willing to bet $100 Pollard didn't write this letter.
I did notice the kid's email address. It's an "iastate.edu" account. I took this to mean he was a student (I'd highly doubt a faculty member would write such an email).
I trust Jon and Steve that they have reason to believe this email to be real and fact checked - they are not idiots.
Just for the record - I'm a sports talk show host. Not a journalist for Iowa State. I do write stories on my website but I don't wear a "journalist" hat in Des Moines.
You might say I have responsibility but I didn't put this up...I simply put this up here. I trust Jon and Steve that they have reason to believe this email to be real and fact checked - they are not idiots. Jon even has explained what happened in this thread.
so you guys don't care that you have to be donor in order to be a die-hard fan in the eyes of your AD?
Just curious cause I was shocked at that reaction by your AD (no, not because of our history)
And Jon said they gave him an everyday invitation to be on the show. That is not giving him an opportunity to verify authenticity or respond to the email.
If what you guys do is not journalism, how do you classify it? Sports talk show hosts should consider themselves a form of journalist. Perhaps thinking you are not is part of the problem. As someone who is regularly on the radio you certainly open yourselves up to slander (or in this case libel) charges. I would hope that you would fact check and give opportunity for responses when you "report news".
This is not always true. what if you can afford a $500 donation, and so can each of your 4 freinds. that equals $2500 bucks and you can buy 10 season tickets under the $2500 donation. on the other hand you can all donate $500 separately and still equal $2500. Does it really matter?? Not saying that this is the case but you are ASSumming that this is the case with no evidence.
If he really did receive over 100 messages and only one of them was negative, I think it's driven more by apathy than lack of negative feelings. People aren't going to waste their time writing negative letters unless they care, people have begun to not care.
If what you guys do is not journalism, how do you classify it? Sports talk show hosts should consider themselves a form of journalist. Perhaps thinking you are not is part of the problem. As someone who is regularly on the radio you certainly open yourselves up to slander (or in this case libel) charges. I would hope that you would fact check and give opportunity for responses when you "report news".
Yes, you get better seats.
I have zero problem owning up to stuff that I step in to. No problem at all. And I also don't have any problem explaining things like this.
I was not comfortable with this going on our page. Matt will verify that, as we exchanged a long IM last night. Steve will verify this, as I emailed him about it last night, and I spoke with him about it again this morning. After we chatted about it, I at least got to the point of being ambivalent about it being posted, and said it's his call, and he felt like it should go up.
As for contacting Jamie, we contacted him on Tuesday and gave him an every day invitation to come onto the show this week. He chose to decline, which is totally fine.
I agree with this - LOTS of apathy out there. Outside of this board, not anywhere near the conversation about the Big 12 tourney like there used to be.