I'll say this and then I'm bowing out.
There's no actual indication of NIL playing any role here. Kids changed commitments pre-NIL and will continue to with NIL. Now I'm not saying there isn't money involved sometimes. But that's no different than what the system was pre-NIL. But these are 18 year old kids that change their minds, just like they have for decades prior.
But the only reason people are claiming this kid was paid is because you want to support your narrative that NIL will be destructive to college football, and that theory is based on an idea that these kids don't deserve to be compensated for their services at a college level. And that I will always fundamentally disagree with.
There's no actual indication of NIL playing any role here. Kids changed commitments pre-NIL and will continue to with NIL. Now I'm not saying there isn't money involved sometimes. But that's no different than what the system was pre-NIL. But these are 18 year old kids that change their minds, just like they have for decades prior.
But the only reason people are claiming this kid was paid is because you want to support your narrative that NIL will be destructive to college football, and that theory is based on an idea that these kids don't deserve to be compensated for their services at a college level. And that I will always fundamentally disagree with.