Re: Writer's Strike: What shows are coming back, which are'nt
I think ragging on network television is unwarranted. Seems to me that every argument you provide seems to suggest TV (and not just network TV) is reflecting society, not shaping society. That is, people are lazy and TV is catering to that. I don't think TV made people lazy. Just as I don't think video games makes people violent. You even say yourself, "all of that drives shows..." And you obviously don't believe it is just network TV, as your examples include the cable news channels. First 48 may be a very good show and a good example of the quality shows shown on cable. Unfortunately, it on the same channel as Gene Simmons Family Jewels.
My gripes with network TV have far more to do with the society, which they help to shape and create, than they do with the programming itself. It's just lazy. It's McDonald's vs. a proper meal. It's people who would rather watch news entertainment (CNN, Fox News, MSNBC etc.) than be informed about world events. It's people who would rather watch NCIS or CSI than the First 48. It's people who don't want their boundaries tested, or their view of reality challenged, and that's really irritating to me. And all of that drives shows that are "safe" and "proven" as opposed to edgy and new. It's why Seinfeld almost didn't get made - it was too "jewey" for mainstream America.
I think ragging on network television is unwarranted. Seems to me that every argument you provide seems to suggest TV (and not just network TV) is reflecting society, not shaping society. That is, people are lazy and TV is catering to that. I don't think TV made people lazy. Just as I don't think video games makes people violent. You even say yourself, "all of that drives shows..." And you obviously don't believe it is just network TV, as your examples include the cable news channels. First 48 may be a very good show and a good example of the quality shows shown on cable. Unfortunately, it on the same channel as Gene Simmons Family Jewels.