kcbob79clone
Well-Known Member
Liability from covid (NCAA banning covid waivers) is a big driver in why the b10 and p12 cancelled
Did you see where Penn State is making "students" sign waivers to get into school this fall? Ironic
Liability from covid (NCAA banning covid waivers) is a big driver in why the b10 and p12 cancelled
yes. And?Did you see where Penn State is making "students" sign waivers to get into school this fall? Ironic
Liability from covid (NCAA banning covid waivers) is a big driver in why the b10 and p12 cancelled
Did that word get down to Penn State. They are making ALL students, athlete or not, to sign one:
No, because we've only scheduled 10.Does anyone here really think that we will be playing a FULL season of games. We will get started, and before long, one or two teams will come down with the virus and that will be the end of it.
By moving the schedule back, the Big 12 and the rest are trying to buy time, nothing more.
Well..................is he wrong???No, because we've only scheduled 10.
Not if the conferences who aren't playing lose more players and coaches.The thing is, if we lose even one coach or player (not ISU but all of college football that plays this year), then the Big 10 probably made the correct decision.
@Gorm not sure you want to follow the only school implementing it that had a child rapist and turned a blind eye over it.
I understand. But when you have doctors saying you can "responsibly resume"...? All professional sports have resumed, right?
I guess I'm just curious what you think the Big 12 has done. Found some crack doctors that will tell them what they want to hear? Do you really think they aren't relying on actual medical advice?
you were trying to make a point that Penn St. does waivers for students and athletes playing sports.Link to where I said I was a fan of Pedo state?
I don't think they found crack doctors by any means, but it's easy to get someone to say what you want if you pay them enough. It's no different than a trial where both sides bring in "experts" that say completely opposite things about the same issue.
you were trying to make a point that Penn St. does waivers for students and athletes playing sports.
If Penn St. wants to say it includes sporting activities, which I don't think it does, a plaintiff can point out the NCAA ruling and that will likely take precedence.
just admit you did not read the article in your tweet and you're wrong in that it does not cover Penn St. NCAA athletes from sports. You read the headline and that was it.Yep, I sure did. I used them as an example of a school that is requireing all students, including athletes to sign COVID waivers.
An NCAA ruling has weight in a court of law?
![]()
just admit you did not read the article in your tweet and you're wrong in that it does not cover Penn St. NCAA athletes from sports.
i did, obviously you didn't as it mentions nothing specifically about athletes in sports in it.The real question is, did YOU read it. There is no article, it was a document.
i did, obviously you didn't as it mentions nothing specifically about athletes in sports in it.
Ahh yes, this was the post I was looking for. Don't provide answers. Just tell me I'm too dumb to understand. Classic.
Gotta love the respectful discourse you can get on here.
Can't answer a question so you just say "Ur dumb" and move on, because you know you don't have an answer.
I'd again ask you, Mayo and Duke seem to be pretty reputable places, are they not?