Just find a good financial advisor and pay them for their service. It'll save you money in the long run IMO. Go for one that is fee-only.
I've been looking but the ones who advertise for fee based services actually want a continual fee over time and not just on an occasional basis.Just find a good financial advisor and pay them for their service. It'll save you money in the long run IMO. Go for one that is fee-only.
Because that’s how it works. Still worth it IMO.I've been looking but the ones who advertise for fee based services actually want a continual fee over time and not just on an occasional basis.
Could you tell me more about the value they give over time as opposed to just doing an assessment and doing the follow-on work on your own?Because that’s how it works. Still worth it IMO.
By over time do you mean like yearly? Wouldn't be all bad to have yearly mtgs IMO.I've been looking but the ones who advertise for fee based services actually want a continual fee over time and not just on an occasional basis.
Taxes on untaxed 401k or IRA are substantial.
I am going to be retiring in a few years. I have a Vanguard advisor that is helping me prepare for that with investing and the navigation of social security, IRA's, Roth conversions and RMD's. I also am going to hire a person to consult with on a yearly basis to oversee what we are doing and to help my wife with all of that stuff, if I should pass in an untimely fashion.Is anyone planning on retiring in the next few years? Are you planning to have a investment professional help get you there? I'm primarily concerned with tax hits from 401K, pension, etc.. I'd like to make reasonable choices but not spend a lot of money for an advisor. Many advisors I have found want a steady fee over time, but I'd like to just get periodical checks to make sure everything is going well.
If you're comfortable doing your own investing, I'd suggest meeting with a CPA who specializes in tax planning on an hourly fee basis.Is anyone planning on retiring in the next few years? Are you planning to have a investment professional help get you there? I'm primarily concerned with tax hits from 401K, pension, etc.. I'd like to make reasonable choices but not spend a lot of money for an advisor. Many advisors I have found want a steady fee over time, but I'd like to just get periodical checks to make sure everything is going well.
$120 per year gives you a very good idea where you stand. Plus you can analyze different scenarios going forward to stress test and see how things may turn out.Is anyone planning on retiring in the next few years? Are you planning to have a investment professional help get you there? I'm primarily concerned with tax hits from 401K, pension, etc.. I'd like to make reasonable choices but not spend a lot of money for an advisor. Many advisors I have found want a steady fee over time, but I'd like to just get periodical checks to make sure everything is going well.
I like using Bolden. A very good financial analysis tool.$120 per year gives you a very good idea where you stand. Plus you can analyze different scenarios going forward to stress test and see how things may turn out.
![]()
Financial and Retirement Planning Software | Boldin
The #1 retirement planning tool online. Go beyond savings and investments with the best and most comprehensive financial planning software.www.boldin.com
Your last part, medical, is why many retire before they want. There are many that say I’m going until 65 for Medicare. Then a medical problem arises and forces them out.I have a well organized spreadsheet that I update every year. I’m on planning on working for another 30 years… until I’m 67.
My assumptions (savings rates, returns, draw down rates, and lifespan) are all very conservative.
So I suppose I could retire sooner. Or maybe live more frivolously now. But I’ve told myself I’ll reassess the actual date much more seriously when I’m 45 and just keep accumulating for now.
I don’t know how one could ever anticipate medical expenses….
My point was its a myth that each person is paid the same, which it is. Yes, we all get the same increase year after year. But even if you are at 30+, you still get the increase that the union bargained for. So do all the nonunion teachers, I like to call them scabs. I pay my union dues, and they get the same raise that our union bargained for.
How is education any different than many factory jobs, they use a scale, and where you land on the scale is your salary.
Years ago I was teaching in a district that gave bonuses to teachers for meeting district standards or above. The only problem was no one except the shop teacher knew about it. He was good friends with the principle. We figured he made an extra 3 grand for each of those years. When the rest of us found out, we did the extra eval. I think I ended up with an extra hundred bucks like everyone else. That was dropped from the contract shortly after.
The problem with merit based pay in education is it just does not work real well. What do I base it on? Maybe one year I have a class of highly rated kids and then the next year I have a lot of poor to average students. Their basic skills ranking is going to up or down depending on how high the kids are. Take a teacher that only has upper level AP classes, how do you compare him to the teacher that has all freshman students? You can't, merit pay for teachers sounds good on paper, but generally does not work in the classroom.