What's this team missing?

What's missing?

  • Swagger

    Votes: 6 7.0%
  • 3 Point Shot

    Votes: 21 24.4%
  • Coaching/Fred

    Votes: 18 20.9%
  • Bleached Tips

    Votes: 2 2.3%
  • Hustle

    Votes: 26 30.2%
  • Closers

    Votes: 14 16.3%
  • Depth

    Votes: 43 50.0%
  • Derpth

    Votes: 11 12.8%
  • Cheap High Quality Jerseys

    Votes: 3 3.5%
  • Loud Fans (too quiet)

    Votes: 10 11.6%
  • Clone Cones

    Votes: 3 3.5%
  • Nothing, the best is yet to come

    Votes: 7 8.1%

  • Total voters
    86

Wesley

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
70,923
546
113
Omaha
They're missing the blue-collar, gritty type players. We'll never be a landing spot for McDonalds AA type talent. So, instead, we need kids that play like DeAndre Kane. He played with toughness, grit, and a will to win. I'd take a roster full of those types of kids over those that have "swagger". You don't need swagger. You need confidence and determination.
Whar Curtis Stinson?
 

allfourcy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 26, 2012
6,950
2,983
113
They treat defense like it's a chore, with the exception of Matt Thomas. He's playing his *** off at both ends of the floor, but he's not a leader. Not yet, anyway. And they have no sense of urgency. Give up an easy bucket? No biggie, we'll get it back at the other end.

It's still too early to give up on this group. There's too much talent and experience there. But one of the seniors or Monte has to give them more on the defensive end. Set an example and the other guys will follow.

Idk, I guess I have to eat my words. I could have sworn that this team was better defensively than last years. And yesterday, we had stretches where we played tough defense i thought. Especially Monte. We just can't sustain it. That Baylor run in the second half, in about 40 seconds, we missed two 'wide open' good looks from 3, and Baylor made two contested 3's. If its the other way around we win the game. Baylor's defense gives you all kinds of 3's. We just couldn't hit them yesterday. As for the 94 pts., it seems like a ton but we also had to put them on the line a lot at the end.
 

oldwiseman

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2009
1,368
681
113
Whether it's coaching or the players themselves, they are missing the ability to compete for an entire game. They've shown their capable of great things. But until they play a complete game consistently, they aren't playing to their full potential and they'll fall short of their goals.
 

heitclone

Well-Known Member
Jun 21, 2009
16,620
14,415
113
45
Way up there
I think after watching our horrible interior defense yesterday that what this team is missing, is Dustin Hogue. I think having DH last year hid some of the defensive weakness of Georges, Nader and even McKay. We are a better offensively but we have guys being asked to play Hogues role who just don't have the ability on the defensive end. The good news is, in the big 12, Baylor is one of only the teams with multiple bigs who can bully us down low. No matter who we play at that spot, the "4" spot is our weakest spot defensively, that kills you against a team like Baylor.
 

jahfg

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2006
3,708
132
63
Ames
Georges Niang is one of our best defenders. He is more active helping and making his guy work than McKay is.

This isn't rocket science. Our team is at their best when they are running up and down the court making plays in transition. We saw it at the beginning of the game. To be able to play that style, you have to get consistent defensive stops and force turnovers. It's that simple. We have to be more aggressive defensively, especially McKay. There's no reason he should end a game with less than 4 fouls.
 

CascadeClone

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2009
10,880
13,966
113
This team is missing basically any toughness. Look at the 99 team that won at KU. Nurse, Horton, Tinsley, Fizer, Rancik, Shirley.


I am late to the thread, and haven't read it all, but this is ABSOLUTELY the answer. Both mental and physical toughness. (Just saw Clone_12 said it too)

Mentally, they still let offense drive defense. If someone misses an open shot (Nader), or thinks they got fouled (Jameel), they all go into pout mode on defense. What's the opposite of spurtability? Collapse-ability? It's been there for a while and seems unlikely to change now. Maybe Prohm needs to go full Bobby Knight on them, idk.

Physically, guys like Kane and Ejim and Houge provided a lot of physical toughness that is totally absent now. Just zero interior defense. Jameel can block shots, but he has no idea how to use his body at all and is usually out of position - he is still very raw as a basketball player. He needs to play meat grinder for an hour a day. And Georges and Nader are both guards trapped in a forwards body.


If you look up TOUGHNESS in the dictionary, there is a picture of Kantrail Horton, chewing gum, sweat glistening on his head, dribbling a basketball, and looking into your eyes like he is going to murder you.
 

clonedude

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2006
33,035
29,272
113
Who are the 6 people so far that voted for "Swagger"?

Wow, are you guys wrong. This team has way too much swagger, that's their problem. All swagger and not enough desire, hustle, toughness, will, pride, etc.

After the loss yesterday Monte Morris basically said..... "We lost. It is what it is.". Uhhh... wut? That's it? It is what it is? Ummm... you just lost your chance to win the Big 12 yesterday most likely. It was a HUGE loss, and you should be ticked at yourselves for not playing like you know you're capable of.

It's as if he's already got one eye on the NBA and one eye still in this season. Like he just wants to get this season over with and move on the pros and make tons of money.... which I hate to say it.... isn't likely to happen for him right now.

They play with a lackadaisical attitude, and after the game they seem to not really care they lost either. I don't get it? They play well below their talent level most nights IMO. I'd almost rather have a team that isn't as "talented" but plays well above their talent level most nights. It's much easier to cheer for that than a team that feels they don't need to work hard or constantly give great effort for 40 minutes every game.
 

jahfg

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2006
3,708
132
63
Ames
Who are the 6 people so far that voted for "Swagger"?

Wow, are you guys wrong. This team has way too much swagger, that's their problem. All swagger and not enough desire, hustle, toughness, will, pride, etc.

After the loss yesterday Monte Morris basically said..... "We lost. It is what it is.". Uhhh... wut? That's it? It is what it is? Ummm... you just lost your chance to win the Big 12 yesterday most likely. It was a HUGE loss, and you should be ticked at yourselves for not playing like you know you're capable of.

It's as if he's already got one eye on the NBA and one eye still in this season. Like he just wants to get this season over with and move on the pros and make tons of money.... which I hate to say it.... isn't likely to happen for him right now.

They play with a lackadaisical attitude, and after the game they seem to not really care they lost either. I don't get it? They play well below their talent level most nights IMO. I'd almost rather have a team that isn't as "talented" but plays well above their talent level most nights. It's much easier to cheer for that than a team that feels they don't need to work hard or constantly give great effort for 40 minutes every game.

Fans should take post game statements from players with a grain of salt. These are kids that, outside of Georges, have little desire to talk to some 40-year-old reporter about why they lost the game. D-1 athletes mostly laugh at obsessive fans like us. They put in hours and hours of hard work. We sit and watch the games. They are far more invested in the success of the team than some dork with 40,000 posts on a message board.
 

clonedude

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2006
33,035
29,272
113
Fans should take post game statements from players with a grain of salt. These are kids that, outside of Georges, have little desire to talk to some 40-year-old reporter about why they lost the game. D-1 athletes mostly laugh at obsessive fans like us. They put in hours and hours of hard work. We sit and watch the games. They are far more invested in the success of the team than some dork with 40,000 posts on a message board.

This team lacks a Dustin Hogue, DeAndre Kane, or Curtis Stinson type toughness and effort. Those guys would bet ticked off after losses. They would take it personally. They had pride.

I want to see some guys on this year's team show that kind of attitude. It is not acceptable to lose, or that should be the mentality anyway.
 

everyyard

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 24, 2006
8,221
3,640
113
48
www.cyclonejerseys.com
Only 2 guys playing at or above potential. Niang and Thomas. I'd triangle and 2 those two the rest of the year if I'm coaching against ISU, and we're done.
 

jahfg

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2006
3,708
132
63
Ames
This team lacks a Dustin Hogue, DeAndre Kane, or Curtis Stinson type toughness and effort. Those guys would bet ticked off after losses. They would take it personally. They had pride.

I want to see some guys on this year's team show that kind of attitude. It is not acceptable to lose, or that should be the mentality anyway.

I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm saying judging a player's pride by how they talk to the media is probably not accurate.
 

jahfg

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2006
3,708
132
63
Ames
Only 2 guys playing at or above potential. Niang and Thomas. I'd triangle and 2 those two the rest of the year if I'm coaching against ISU, and we're done.

The triangle and two isn't magic. We just did a horrible job of trying to get it to Niang. We have a few too many guys on the team that don't understand their role or how good Niang is. I thought Prohm should have had Niang bringing the ball up.
 

madguy30

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 15, 2011
57,286
55,191
113
Out of curiosity, I'm watching the UCLA game from 2000.

They were far from perfect, as a matter of fact they had quite a few miscues in the 1st half.

It was a different team, different situations, etc., but the natural determination that was instilled almost looks foreign. Everyone's just completely dialed in like they woke up in that mode.

Good example: Nurse hits a 3 to go up 30-23, and ISU gets back and is in UCLA's face like they're behind or something.

I actually thought this ISU team had a bit of that at Cincinnati and Oklahoma. I'm just not sure where it goes.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron