The 7 win rule being changed is huge. ISU can't be held hostage by a 7-5 Toledo or Idaho team now.
The one common theme in these projections is ISU being one of two BCS teams, or the only BCS team in the at-large pool. If that happens, ISU will have the pick of the liter as any bowl with an open spot would want ISU. Our travel reputations should favor ISU over any other BCS team too (Boston College). If that happens, ISU will pick a bowl on ESPN in January. Get to 6 wins and ISU will be sitting in the catbird seat.
Or ISU can just win out.
So if ISU gets 6 wins, they will probably not go to the New Mexico Bowl?
Could we get a determination on the 7 win rule. I thought that a bowl can't shut out a fellow conference member by taking a 6 win team over a 7 win team. I haven't heard anything that all 7 win MAC teams trump ALL BCS teams with 6 wins for at large berths. That is BS. SOS should be considered.
6 win teams can not jump 7 win teams within their conference bowl affliations, if there are more eligible teams than bowl slots. So a 6-6 ISU can not jump a 7-5 Texas Tech, if 9 teams are eligible. If 8 teams are eligible, then ISU can jump them.
At-large bowls can pick whoever they want and that's the way it should be. Just look at Toledo. Very good chance they finish 7-5. ISU and Toledo have 1 common opponent, NIU. Toledo lost by 35, ISU won by 17.
6-6 BCS team > 7-5 mid-major team.
That is what I was thinking. But some are saying that ISU can not jump a 7 win MAC team in the selection process for at large bids. That appears to not be the case.
I like how Iowa thinks they are such a great, popular program. Yet, the only people to think the Hawks will be in a BCS game are FROM Iowa. Just an observation.
Just saying what I have been seeing in the projections. Touchy.I would hope they have confidence in their team. Why are you bringing up Iowa into this? Who thought besides the Fanatics that ISU would have a good chance to make a bowl this year?