That’s the same as it has been for us though. I think we’d all be shocked at how much a lot of our players could make on the open market and were likely offered by other teams.
If this fairly unproven guy at unlv thinks they promised him $100k, then I bet 15 of our guys had offers that exceeded that.
Well, one coach throwing out a check value he doesn't have to write, and the collective is balking at it suggests he isn't worth that.
I'm not buying that ISU and other places have a bunch of guys turning down hundreds of thousands of dollars. I'm sure there are a lot of guys getting marginally less at ISU than they could elsewhere, where it's close enough that the other factors are keeping them here. The fact is there's a ton of supposed leaked information about offers and deals, but some of it is probably BS to drive up offers.
There are some real deals that are quite big I'm sure. But I think people are taking a few dozen deals, then extrapolating those to create some sliding scale and market value assignment for thousands of athletes. It's not a transparent market with decent reliable information at all. And a team here and there throwing a huge deal at guys doesn't set a market.
Hell, it's like people trying to use the Deshaun Watson contract to extrapolate to Lamar Jackson and other QBs value. One moronic team offering a stupid contract that no one else would've paid doesn't set the market. Now take into account that vs. college NIL, the NFL is about a million times more transparent, established and organized, and rife with owner collusion. And yet there's still nonsense outlier contracts.
Eventually there will be a smoother market. That will take time, people sifting through what's real and what's BS in terms of $ thrown out there, and collectives getting to more stable revenues.