Not the complete transcripts, but multiple witness transcripts are available throughout the interwebz.You read all the court transcripts? Whoa, you're better than that
Not the complete transcripts, but multiple witness transcripts are available throughout the interwebz.You read all the court transcripts? Whoa, you're better than that
That's management 101 right there.
Document, document, document.
Not the complete transcripts, but multiple witness transcripts are available throughout the interwebz.
But anyone who manages people should know that.In today's world with these laws it is, and that is the problem.
Sounds like a lack of documentation is what did them in. Iowa's attorneys claimed that there were tons of complaints against her, and that's why she was let go, but none of it was documented. Official documentation only showed satisfactory performance reviews.
I have read the transcripts posted by multiple sources.
They do things RIGHT in IC at the U of I
Amirite?
How much of the $1.4 M is the Iowa taxpayer on the hook for?
Just you. They are only going to use your tax money.
It's a really bad decision. At will employee fired bc she was bad at her job.Juries are dumb and easily manipulated. The justice system is just as screwed up as the rest of America. And no I'm not talking about this case in particular because all I've paid attention to are what people are talking about on the radio.
I love that the lawyer says she's $1.4 million dollars richer while we know that is bunk as they will take a good 30-50% chunk I imagine and then the government may take another good chunk.
The problem still is though he could. Have fired her one day bc she smelled bad and he would have been within his rights. For the jury to see this as discrimation is crazy. I would be worried if I were ISU too with this resultWhich is exactly why she won her case. UI brought no physical evidence forward, only testimony. It basically turned into a battle of he said she said, and due to the fact that many of the people that testified are currently still working for Gary Barta I think it may have skewed the jury in some ways.
The problem still is though he could. Have fired her one day bc she smelled bad and he would have been within his rights. For the jury to see this as discrimation is crazy. I would be worried if I were ISU too with this result