Teams
Forum List
Toggle sidebar

The Athletic top 25 for 23-24 season

Daserop

Daserop

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2011
5,863
2,201
113
The Bebop
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: ChickenNuggetMan, cyclonehomer, OscarBerkshire and 16 others
CyPunch

CyPunch

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2019
4,707
11,988
113
Sandy Springs, GA
  • Agree
Reactions: clonedude and jay moe
enisthemenace

enisthemenace

Well-Known Member
Dec 5, 2009
13,903
10,085
113
Runnells, IA
Anyone expecting Iowa State to be in any preseason Top 25 is going to be disappointed…for no reason.

I mean…we lost 5 of our top 6 leading scorers, and arguably our top 2 (maybe more) defenders, from a team that went 19-14; 9-9 last year.

Maybe I misunderstood the OP though.

EDIT: Oh…and The Athletic can eat **** anyway. Garbage site.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: cyclonehomer, isuclone89, Bigman38 and 5 others
L

loyalson4evatru

Active Member
Feb 14, 2016
129
83
28
enisthemenace said:
Anyone expecting Iowa State to be in any preseason Top 25 is going to be disappointed…for no reason.

I mean…we lost 5 of our top 6 leading scorers, and arguably our top 2 (maybe more) defenders, from a team that went 19-14; 9-9 last year.

Maybe I misunderstood the OP though.

EDIT: Oh…and The Athletic can eat **** anyway. Garbage site.
Click to expand...
hardcore ISU bball homers might be surprised. i think we know we're way more talented and better than last year. but outsiders don't.

conf realignment already got me....forgot to include Houston at #13

welcome back Kelvin Sampson.
 
HFCS

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
74,953
65,022
113
LA LA Land
enisthemenace said:
Anyone expecting Iowa State to be in any preseason Top 25 is going to be disappointed…for no reason.

I mean…we lost 5 of our top 6 leading scorers, and arguably our top 2 (maybe more) defenders, from a team that went 19-14; 9-9 last year.

Maybe I misunderstood the OP though.

EDIT: Oh…and The Athletic can eat **** anyway. Garbage site.
Click to expand...

I’m fine with us not being ranked but it’s fun to ask what logical reason Texas tech has to be ranked in football vs ISU in basketball? Is it the slightly less success the past two years or the good but inferior recruiting class?
 
G

Gunnerclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2010
75,175
79,013
113
DSM
HFCS said:
I’m fine with us not being ranked but it’s fun to ask what logical reason Texas tech has to be ranked in football vs ISU in basketball? Is it the slightly less success the past two years or the good but inferior recruiting class?
Click to expand...

Texas Tech in Texas. Automatic football bump.
 
HFCS

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
74,953
65,022
113
LA LA Land
cytor said:
Purdue will always disappoint. Not worried that they will do anything.
Click to expand...

Is there a prop bet at the beginning of the year that Purdue will play under their ncaa seed? That has to be the safest bet if all time lately even though technically you’re picking an underdog.
 
NorthCyd

NorthCyd

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 22, 2011
20,980
35,300
113
I guess I don't see not being ranked as a huge slap in the face. Now if conference pre-season rankings have us ranked last or something like that then yeah, we are being disrespected.
 
Jer

Jer

CF Founder, Creator
Feb 28, 2006
23,580
23,426
10,030
Ehh, whatever. In this world of rosters looking completely different every year, schools that have the most turnover in the starters are typically going to be rated lower than those with continuity or upperclassmen.

Given NIL, that means schools like Iowa State will usually be rated lower to start the year as we're going to have younger teams (even if stud recruits) or older guys that aren't the elite tier of transfers.
 
Last edited:
Urbandale2013

Urbandale2013

Well-Known Member
Jan 28, 2018
4,776
5,920
113
30
Urbandale
The Athletic is an awful organization. I don’t get peoples fascination with them. I wouldn’t put much stock in them even if they were free. Us not being too 25 isn’t a big deal but if they truly only have 3 Big 12 teams they are doing some hard drugs.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: WalkingCY
intrepid27

intrepid27

Well-Known Member
Oct 9, 2006
5,998
5,067
113
Marion, IA
I think Chris Williams and Jared discussed this at the end of last season but IMO preseason and early season rankings will mean less moving forward.

With NIL and a growing transfer portal there will be more and more teams that have high number of new players each year. They might a couple of months to to gel but come tournament time will be contenders.
 
  • Like
Reactions: isutrevman
BoxsterCy

BoxsterCy

Moderator
Staff member
Sep 14, 2009
48,049
46,785
113
Minnesota
Urbandale2013 said:
The Athletic is an awful organization. I don’t get peoples fascination with them. I wouldn’t put much stock in them even if they were free. Us not being too 25 isn’t a big deal but if they truly only have 3 Big 12 teams they are doing some hard drugs.
Click to expand...

It's mostly a collective of unemployed writers from around he country. It's really hit and miss with a LOT of misses. For god's sake, Scott Dochterman Hawkeye slobbers for them.
 
  • Love
  • Agree
Reactions: Marcelason78 and CloneLawman
cyclones500

cyclones500

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2010
38,650
26,626
113
Michigan
basslakebeacon.com
Meh, pretty much every top 25 I've seen within the past month has only those four B12 teams ranked, in some order (KU at the top in all of them). No. 13 is lowest rank for UH among the ones I've seen, I think.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron
Top Bottom