Returning Production Statistics for B12 MBB Teams ...

[surly]

Credit:
texasjeremy_Scout

Returning production, based on 2018-19 stats, minus players that are out of eligibility, announced intentions to enter the draft, or announced intentions to transfer. Obviously, it will change if any players decide to return to school (or don't actually transfer):

AVERAGE PERCENTAGES (9 categories below)

MINUTES
180.0 - Oklahoma State (89.6%)
150.5 - Baylor (75.0%)
129.4 - Texas (64.1%)
120.5 - West Virginia (59.4%)
111.3 - Kansas State (55.7%)
104.0 - Texas Tech (51.7%)
84.9 - Oklahoma (42.3%)
74.9 - Iowa State (37.4%)
66.1 - Kansas (32.7%)
64.1 - TCU (31.6%)

POINTS
62.2 - Oklahoma State (91.4%)
51.9 - Baylor (72.2%)
42.3 - Texas Tech (58.1%)
39.3 - Texas (55.4%)
38.1 - West Virginia (51.7%)
30.9 - Kansas State (47.0%)
29.1 - Oklahoma (40.9%)
23.3 - Iowa State (30.3%)
20.7 - Kansas (27.4%)
19.1 - TCU (25.9%)

REBOUNDS
27.8 - Oklahoma State (90.1%)
27.8 - Baylor (81.0%)
20.2 - West Virginia (56.5%)
19.4 - Kansas State (62.9%)
17.0 - Texas (53.3%)
15.9 - Oklahoma (48.0%)
15.4 - Texas Tech (48.3%)
13.6 - Kansas (38.4%)
12.4 - Iowa State (38.2%)
11.6 - TCU (34.6%)

ASSISTS
12.0 - Oklahoma State (90.8%)
9.4 - West Virginia (69.1%)
9.3 - Baylor (67.0%)
9.0 - Texas (68.6%)
7.9 - Texas Tech (58.1%)
5.9 - Oklahoma (46.7%)
5.5 - Kansas State (40.5%)
4.7 - Iowa State (31.1%)
3.5 - TCU (21.9%)
3.1 - Kansas (23.6%)

STEALS
5.0 - Oklahoma State (87.4%)
4.8 - Baylor (78.0%)
3.8 - Texas Tech (52.2%)
3.8 - Kansas State (50.0%)
3.6 - West Virginia (58.7%)
3.3 - Texas (54.2%)
2.9 - Oklahoma (49.3%)
2.8 - Iowa State (40.1%)
2.1 - TCU (30.2%)
1.9 - Kansas (28.8%)

BLOCKS
4.4 - Baylor (93.7%)
4.0 - Oklahoma State (92.1%)
2.6 - TCU (59.3%)
2.3 - Kansas (59.0%)
2.1 - Iowa State (46.9%)
1.6 - Kansas State (71.1%)
1.6 - Oklahoma (53.9%)
1.6 - Texas (38.2%)
1.4 - West Virginia (41.3%)
1.3 - Texas Tech (26.3%)

FG ATTEMPTS
51.1 - Oklahoma State (91.0%)
41.0 - Baylor (70.9%)
35.4 - Texas (61.0%)
32.3 - West Virginia (53.4%)
31.6 - Texas Tech (56.8%)
26.3 - Kansas State (47.6%)
23.3 - Oklahoma (40.2%)
16.8 - Iowa State (28.7%)
16.1 - Kansas (27.2%)
15.1 - TCU (25.8%)

3PT ATTEMPTS
22.9 - Oklahoma State (97.2%)
18.2 - Texas (72.1%)
15.0 - Baylor (63.4%)
12.3 - Texas Tech (61.7%)
12.1 - West Virginia (51.3%)
10.0 - Kansas State (47.0%)
6.8 - Oklahoma (35.2%)
6.6 - Iowa State (28.4%)
4.1 - TCU (18.5%)
3.9 - Kansas (18.8%)

FT ATTEMPTS
14.4 - Oklahoma State (83.8%)
14.4 - Baylor (77.2%)
11.6 - West Virginia (49.0%)
11.1 - Texas Tech (61.0%)
8.8 - Kansas State (51.9%)
7.8 - Texas (45.2%)
6.5 - Oklahoma (35.8%)
6.0 - TCU (32.4%)
5.9 - Kansas (30.8%)
4.7 - Iowa State (27.0%)

 

[jdcyclone19]

Should put basketball in your title

 

[UNIclonefan]

Hopefully Prohm can build upon key pieces like Young, Halliburton, and Conditt. I wouldn't be surprised if Griffen played a big role or if Leech came in and was a stud.

 

[TheJackWePack5]

Hopefully Prohm can build upon key pieces like Young, Halliburton, and Conditt. I wouldn't be surprised if Griffen played a big role or if Leech came in and was a stud.

And Jacobson.

 

[cycfan1]

Who cares?
Kansas incoming freshman are a million times better than what Oklahoma St returns. Its really irrelevant to say that Okie St has all their production from a last place team returning... and totally ignore who everyone else is bringing in for recruits.

 

[coolerifyoudid]

If only players didn't graduate or go to the NBA

 

[surly]

Who cares?
Kansas incoming freshman are a million times better than what Oklahoma St returns. Its really irrelevant to say that Okie St has all their production from a last place team returning... and totally ignore who everyone else is bringing in for recruits.

Obviously, it's data that has to be taken in context. For example, I was struck by how much TCU loses.

 

[TheJackWePack5]

Obviously, it's data that has to be taken in context. For example, I was struck by how much TCU loses.

It’ll be interesting with them to see how that team rallies around the awkwardness of the Dixon/UCLA ordeal.

They have two really good players to build around.

 

[FinalFourCy]

It’ll be interesting with them to see how that team rallies around the awkwardness of the Dixon/UCLA ordeal.

They have two really good players to build around.

If Bane and Noi stay in the draft, it’ll be a challenge for Dixon

 

[AuH2O]

Credit:
texasjeremy_Scout

Returning production, based on 2018-19 stats, minus players that are out of eligibility, announced intentions to enter the draft, or announced intentions to transfer. Obviously, it will change if any players decide to return to school (or don't actually transfer):

AVERAGE PERCENTAGES (9 categories below)

MINUTES
180.0 - Oklahoma State (89.6%)
150.5 - Baylor (75.0%)
129.4 - Texas (64.1%)
120.5 - West Virginia (59.4%)
111.3 - Kansas State (55.7%)
104.0 - Texas Tech (51.7%)
84.9 - Oklahoma (42.3%)
74.9 - Iowa State (37.4%)
66.1 - Kansas (32.7%)
64.1 - TCU (31.6%)

POINTS
62.2 - Oklahoma State (91.4%)
51.9 - Baylor (72.2%)
42.3 - Texas Tech (58.1%)
39.3 - Texas (55.4%)
38.1 - West Virginia (51.7%)
30.9 - Kansas State (47.0%)
29.1 - Oklahoma (40.9%)
23.3 - Iowa State (30.3%)
20.7 - Kansas (27.4%)
19.1 - TCU (25.9%)

REBOUNDS
27.8 - Oklahoma State (90.1%)
27.8 - Baylor (81.0%)
20.2 - West Virginia (56.5%)
19.4 - Kansas State (62.9%)
17.0 - Texas (53.3%)
15.9 - Oklahoma (48.0%)
15.4 - Texas Tech (48.3%)
13.6 - Kansas (38.4%)
12.4 - Iowa State (38.2%)
11.6 - TCU (34.6%)

ASSISTS
12.0 - Oklahoma State (90.8%)
9.4 - West Virginia (69.1%)
9.3 - Baylor (67.0%)
9.0 - Texas (68.6%)
7.9 - Texas Tech (58.1%)
5.9 - Oklahoma (46.7%)
5.5 - Kansas State (40.5%)
4.7 - Iowa State (31.1%)
3.5 - TCU (21.9%)
3.1 - Kansas (23.6%)

STEALS
5.0 - Oklahoma State (87.4%)
4.8 - Baylor (78.0%)
3.8 - Texas Tech (52.2%)
3.8 - Kansas State (50.0%)
3.6 - West Virginia (58.7%)
3.3 - Texas (54.2%)
2.9 - Oklahoma (49.3%)
2.8 - Iowa State (40.1%)
2.1 - TCU (30.2%)
1.9 - Kansas (28.8%)

BLOCKS
4.4 - Baylor (93.7%)
4.0 - Oklahoma State (92.1%)
2.6 - TCU (59.3%)
2.3 - Kansas (59.0%)
2.1 - Iowa State (46.9%)
1.6 - Kansas State (71.1%)
1.6 - Oklahoma (53.9%)
1.6 - Texas (38.2%)
1.4 - West Virginia (41.3%)
1.3 - Texas Tech (26.3%)

FG ATTEMPTS
51.1 - Oklahoma State (91.0%)
41.0 - Baylor (70.9%)
35.4 - Texas (61.0%)
32.3 - West Virginia (53.4%)
31.6 - Texas Tech (56.8%)
26.3 - Kansas State (47.6%)
23.3 - Oklahoma (40.2%)
16.8 - Iowa State (28.7%)
16.1 - Kansas (27.2%)
15.1 - TCU (25.8%)

3PT ATTEMPTS
22.9 - Oklahoma State (97.2%)
18.2 - Texas (72.1%)
15.0 - Baylor (63.4%)
12.3 - Texas Tech (61.7%)
12.1 - West Virginia (51.3%)
10.0 - Kansas State (47.0%)
6.8 - Oklahoma (35.2%)
6.6 - Iowa State (28.4%)
4.1 - TCU (18.5%)
3.9 - Kansas (18.8%)

FT ATTEMPTS
14.4 - Oklahoma State (83.8%)
14.4 - Baylor (77.2%)
11.6 - West Virginia (49.0%)
11.1 - Texas Tech (61.0%)
8.8 - Kansas State (51.9%)
7.8 - Texas (45.2%)
6.5 - Oklahoma (35.8%)
6.0 - TCU (32.4%)
5.9 - Kansas (30.8%)
4.7 - Iowa State (27.0%)

Assuming this is prior to Culver declaring for the draft. This kind of thing is interesting, but obviously a case like OSU is deceiving. Plenty of teams have guys that weren't good enough to play that if thrown into big minutes on a bad team could generate some decent volume stats like OSU or WVU guys did. With transfers and how ready freshman are to step in and play these days it's a lot easier to reload.

 

[jbindm]

Obviously, it's data that has to be taken in context. For example, I was struck by how much TCU loses.

I wish you had put that in your original post. I just put everything I own on OSU winning the Big 12 next year.

 

[surly]

I wish you had put that in your original post. I just put everything I own on OSU winning the Big 12 next year.

I have too much respect for the intellectual firepower of your average CF poster to have done that.