The Big East didn't go willingly, didn't have anything like a GOR, nor did the ACC at the time Maryland left, which was also in serious financial straits when the B1G came calling.
Does a GOR have anything to do with conference pride?
The Big East didn't go willingly, didn't have anything like a GOR, nor did the ACC at the time Maryland left, which was also in serious financial straits when the B1G came calling.
I don't think it would be quite that simple. ACC has a lot of pride and history, I don't think they'd just bend over for the SEC because ESPN tells them to.
Dude…ESPN just destroyed our conference and took top content from FOX right from under their nose. All ESPN has getting in the way of the ACC is ESPN.
Does a GOR have anything to do with conference pride?
So the GOR doesn't matter?
It does and will leverage ESPN and the SEC into an extended media deal and maybe a buyout too.So the GOR doesn't matter?
Not untouchable. Just more expensive. Maybe too expensive for the next couple years, but when you get within 5 years of that deal being up, the league could dissolve quickly.I think so? Either way, it makes ACC schools' media rights untouchable through 2036. At least, that's what I've been told.
Not for ESPN, when that’s the only game in town and they can cut the credit cards for the rest of the ACC pretty quick.
So ESPN can just null and void the ACC's GOR? This is what was reported when it was signed:
The conference's grant of rights makes it financially untenable for a school to leave, guaranteeing in the 20 years of the deal that a school's media rights, including revenue, for all home games would remain with the ACC regardless of the school's affiliation.
The ACC's new grant of rights also automatically extends Notre Dame's contract with the conference as a member in all sports but football through 2035-36, a source said. If the Irish forgo football independence in the next 20 years, they will be contracted to join the ACC.
IMO a 16 team SEC doesn't guarantee the SEC getting more teams in a 12 team playoff than when they had 14 teams. If Bama, LSU, Georgia, Florida, A&M, OU and Texas beat up on each other- more 2-3 loss teams might mean a tougher road to the playoffs. That doesn't even include games against historically solid teams in Auburn
IMO the key for the SEC to maximize ms is having 4 divisions of 5 TE]
No, I’m saying they have an easier path to making a deal where everyone agrees to reduce or ignore the GOR for the teams leaving.
ESPN will go bankrupt w/in a couple-ish more years. And I will laugh at the hillbillies with glee.
I get that. I just don't think the ACC will so peacefully agree to have itself torn to bits and reduced to G5 status.
Here's Frank the Tank's assessment of the TX…He mentions KU to the Big Ten but no mention of ISU or other Big 12 leftovers.
Red River Realignment: Texas and Oklahoma Talk to the SEC
But ESPN holds the right to the ACC, so why wouldn't they either want the league to be successful or want to push towards the better schools to be folded into this so called super conference of 30 to 40 teams.Nope, if ESPN doesn't step up and increase ACC rights fees, I'm sure Clemson, UNC, Notre Dame, etc. will be more than willing to listen to Big10 as well as SEC.
They may not, but it’s a heck of a lot more feasible for the SEC/ESPN to accomplish if they have grand aspirations rather than the B1G/FOX. Money talks too…watch every member of the SEC, sans TAMU (allowed for show by the SEC for prosperity and ego), vote a huge YES when this all goes through.
Oh I agree it'd be more feasible for SEC/ESPN than for B1G/FOX... I just don't think it's realistic for the ACC to let itself be completely destroyed and relegated to G5 status for either of them.