Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)

Gunnerclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2010
75,606
79,887
113
DSM


He is saying that FSU, UNC, Clemson, and Miami might be willing to bribe other schools to dissolve the conference by footing the bill for the difference to payout. Interesting.


This has been my question from a few pages back. Why wouldn’t they do this? People talk about GOR like it’s some unassailable fortress. It’s a Maginot Line. There is ALWAYS a way around it.
 

Clonefan94

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2006
11,186
6,218
113
Schaumburg, IL
The Bill Walton Experience from last night was really something. Whatever happens in conference realignment, I hope it ends up with him out of broadcasting. Or at least buried so deep on some network's roster of announcers that I never have to hear him again.
**** that guy and anyone else from that conference that thinks where they live is so much better than the middle of the country. There are a lot more desolate god forsaken shitholes out west of the Rockies than there is in the center of the US.
 

CysRage

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2009
13,378
8,682
113


He is saying that FSU, UNC, Clemson, and Miami might be willing to bribe other schools to dissolve the conference by footing the bill for the difference to payout. Interesting.

If so, why would the Big 12 throw a lifesaver to Utah when the Big 12 can get the best of the ACC after the Big Ten SEC take who they want? The Big 12 could get their choice of Pitt, Virginia, Virginia Tech along with Arizona, ASU and Colorado. That would be a solid conference.
 

Yellow Snow

Full of nonsense....
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 19, 2006
2,498
2,213
113
Osage, IA
If so, why would the Big 12 throw a lifesaver to Utah when the Big 12 can get the best of the ACC after the Big Ten SEC take who they want? The Big 12 could get their choice of Pitt, Virginia, Virginia Tech along with Arizona, ASU and Colorado. That would be a solid conference.
Yep. By the way, I found this Youtube vid on the BYU board just now and posted for informational purposes.
 

Cardinal and Gold

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2016
1,388
1,953
113


He is saying that FSU, UNC, Clemson, and Miami might be willing to bribe other schools to dissolve the conference by footing the bill for the difference to payout. Interesting.

It would still be a large net positive for the teams that get invites to the BIG or SEC, but there are a few things not addressed. The Big 12 will renegotiate before the end of the ACC deal. Which will actually decrease the difference between the ACC projections and the Big 12 projections, if not swap the difference. But he is also assuming that the Big 12 will accept all the remaining members needed to get to 8 to dissolve. I don't think that is necessarily a given. They may have to pay a few teams' AAC difference which is a much larger sum, but as stated earlier would still be a net positive. Then there are going to be a handful of other teams just SOL. That doesn't matter to the Big 12 at all, but I feel sympathy for them just like some of the PAC-12 teams. Dog eat dog world
 

Cybone

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 11, 2006
1,649
1,432
113
Dunno, feels like if there are defections from the PAC, it will only be AZ and CU. I am cool with that. Then BY adds the 2 to 4 BB only schools.

Wait and see what happens with the ACC and pick it dry too.

Ultimately, it is so much nicer not talking about the demise of the BIG12 for a change….
 

isucy86

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2006
9,131
7,731
113
Dubuque
If so, why would the Big 12 throw a lifesaver to Utah when the Big 12 can get the best of the ACC after the Big Ten SEC take who they want? The Big 12 could get their choice of Pitt, Virginia, Virginia Tech along with Arizona, ASU and Colorado. That would be a solid conference.
I feel there is value getting realignment settled. To go through realignment chaos every time a conference TV media deal is renegotiated detracts from college athletics.

It isn't going to happen, but the best thing would be creation of a P3 now instead of fumbling toward it over the next 12 years
 

Yellow Snow

Full of nonsense....
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 19, 2006
2,498
2,213
113
Osage, IA
It would still be a large net positive for the teams that get invites to the BIG or SEC, but there are a few things not addressed. The Big 12 will renegotiate before the end of the ACC deal. Which will actually decrease the difference between the ACC projections and the Big 12 projections, if not swap the difference. But he is also assuming that the Big 12 will accept all the remaining members needed to get to 8 to dissolve. I don't think that is necessarily a given. They may have to pay a few teams' AAC difference which is a much larger sum, but as stated earlier would still be a net positive. Then there are going to be a handful of other teams just SOL. That doesn't matter to the Big 12 at all, but I feel sympathy for them just like some of the PAC-12 teams. Dog eat dog world
I have a feeling that if the ACC votes to dissolve the conference, all 8 would be aware of where they are going to be prior to voting for it.

As Gunner has said, maybe the GOR itself is unassailable, but there won't be a GOR if the conference votes itself out of existence. One way to get that done is make it "whole" for the other four schools that voted with you.
 

GoldCy

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2016
985
685
93
You don't blame Utah fans (or other PAC team fans) for being condescending? It's just human nature to be condescending when threatened? Sorry, but I disagree.

The Big 12 survivors all have one thing in common. We're all pretty humble because, unlike any other power conference, we've been poached 3 times over the last few decades. We're finally at a point where all the prima-donnas in our conference have exited.

I realize the wisdom of adding PAC teams to our conference, and I definitely think we should move in that direction, but I'd suggest adding only 2 (probably AU and ASU) to begin with. That will be enough to eliminate the PAC as a competitor. Then we offer UO and UW, but with no special privileges. Then only as a last step do we offer UU and UC.

Letting Utah and Colorado twist in the wind and experience some humility would do them good. The last thing we need is to beg other prima-donnas to join our league.
We still have KU
 

helechopper

Loyal Son Forever True
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 8, 2006
5,938
6,031
113
Chicago
It's crazy how random life is...follow me here...sometimes in life what you think is terrible can turn out to be a positive down the road.

My case in point, the Big12 gets raped, raided, and railroaded for over a decade. Everyone in the nation is ridiculing us and thinking 'thank god I'm not that guy'. Well, guess what rest fo the nation, now you are that guy.

By some twist of fait, being the first to get raided allowed us to get our conference footing and clam our realignment waters, plus take charge of our own destiny.

It's nice that we've already gone through the Big12-steps-of-recovery — 3 times, and this realignment stuff seems normal to us now.

On the ACC: They don't have the balls to gather the 4 and break away. It would be a popcorn inducing moment if they did though.
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,644
65,934
113
LA LA Land
Bill Walton continues to try to troll tonight with "no truckstops here" Me thinks the pac 12 is scared

a UCLA alum/fan angry at the Big 12 right now is really something.

I mean at least let the smoking gun in your own hand cool off a little.

That’s an all time record guilt complex.
 

Gorm

With any luck we will be there by Tuesday.
Jul 6, 2010
5,846
2,723
113
Cedar Rapids, IA
This has been my question from a few pages back. Why wouldn’t they do this? People talk about GOR like it’s some unassailable fortress. It’s a Maginot Line. There is ALWAYS a way around it.

Shhhhhhhhhhh. Saying that out loud might get the Spartan fan in here to start telling everyone how wrong they are about the GOR. :D
 

AuH2O

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2013
12,999
20,960
113
This has been my question from a few pages back. Why wouldn’t they do this? People talk about GOR like it’s some unassailable fortress. It’s a Maginot Line. There is ALWAYS a way around it.
It’s never been a question about whether there is a legal avenue, it’s whether it’s worth the bill.

I find it hard to imagine that if Texas struggles to get out early any of these schools are going to any time soon. UT is way more valuable, had way more money, and a smaller bill.

The idea that the SEC is dying to get Clemson and FSU just isn’t probably true. Clemson-Miami drew a whopping 1.1 million viewers on ESPN on a 2:30 kick last year.

Clemson and FSU would be on their own paying this. Teams that don’t get good ratings in markets they already own aren’t going to make the SEC or their media partners pony up cash.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 2speedy1

CysRage

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2009
13,378
8,682
113
Dunno, feels like if there are defections from the PAC, it will only be AZ and CU. I am cool with that. Then BY adds the 2 to 4 BB only schools.

Wait and see what happens with the ACC and pick it dry too.

Ultimately, it is so much nicer not talking about the demise of the BIG12 for a change….
I have a feeling that if the ACC votes to dissolve the conference, all 8 would be aware of where they are going to be prior to voting for it.

As Gunner has said, maybe the GOR itself is unassailable, but there won't be a GOR if the conference votes itself out of existence.
Who would have thought the ACC signing a long term GOR and media deal (back when it was originally signed) would be what created the instability of the ACC. The deal that they thought would keep the ACC stable did the opposite.
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,644
65,934
113
LA LA Land
Again, in the middle of a great game, "No truckstops here." He's obsessed.

“Truck stop” could just as well as well mean areas where college sports are important to people.

Good and bad things come with everywhere you live and I’ve lived a lot of very different places. Some places fill up college football and basketball venues better than others and it’s not your Pac 10 that comes out on top Bill.
 

Yellow Snow

Full of nonsense....
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 19, 2006
2,498
2,213
113
Osage, IA
It’s never been a question about whether there is a legal avenue, it’s whether it’s worth the bill.

I find it hard to imagine that if Texas struggles to get out early any of these schools are going to any time soon. UT is way more valuable, had way more money, and a smaller bill.

The idea that the SEC is dying to get Clemson and FSU just isn’t probably true. Clemson-Miami drew a whopping 1.1 million viewers on ESPN on a 2:30 kick last year.

Clemson and FSU would be on their own paying this. Teams that don’t get good ratings in markets they already own aren’t going to make the SEC or their media partners pony up cash.
What you are missing, is that this isn't an attempt to actually challenge a GOR, it's an attempt to abolish it and make it no longer in play. Big difference.

Texas and OU had no ability to do this. FSU, UNC, Clemson, and Miami talk enough other schools (4) into doing it, there is no GOR to even challenge in court.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Arkansas Cyclone

AuH2O

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2013
12,999
20,960
113
What you are missing, is that this isn't an attempt to actually challenge a GOR, it's an attempt to abolish it and make it no longer in play. Big difference.

Texas and OU had no ability to do this. FSU, UNC, Clemson, and Miami talk enough other schools (4) into doing it, there is no GOR to even challenge in court.
No, I’m talking those schools having to pay to bribe the others to dissolve. No matter what it’s going to cost the schools that want to leave a lot of money. They’d likely go in at partial payout for years. The GoR sets the “market” for a bribe or buyout.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yellow Snow

Yellow Snow

Full of nonsense....
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 19, 2006
2,498
2,213
113
Osage, IA
No, I’m talking those schools having to pay to bribe the others to dissolve. No matter what it’s going to cost the schools that want to leave a lot of money. They’d likely go in at partial payout for years. The GoR sets the “market” for a bribe or buyout.
Yea, I agree with you there. Weird situation for sure.