Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)

StLouisClone

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2006
8,025
580
113
St. Louis
I think there has to be a chance that the ACC survives. Maybe they get Notre Dame to join as a permanent member and try some form of unequal revenue distribution. Stanford joins as well.
 

GoldCy

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2016
985
685
93
I think one interesting theory is the Power Conferences must have more than 50% of the FBS in order to control the football playoff scheme after 2026. As of 2024, there will be 134 FBS teams. To maintain control, the Power Conferences would need 68 teams.

This assumes no additional FCS schools are promoted to FBS. Supposedly there are at least five plains state schools at different levels of interest in FBS: North Dakota State, South Dakota State, Missouri State, Montana, and Montana State. New FBS teams may increase the number of teams needed in the Power Conferences to retain control of the playoffs.
Changing requirements for FBS or a new division may be next.
 

BCClone

Well Seen Member.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2011
67,638
63,704
113
Not exactly sure.
I think there has to be a chance that the ACC survives. Maybe they get Notre Dame to join as a permanent member and try some form of unequal revenue distribution. Stanford joins as well.
Everyone saying the ACC is for sure screwed is not hitting the pause button, because that is what realignment is hitting with the ACC GOR. If everyone thinks the ACC isn't going to learn from the PAC stupidity, they are fooling themselves. The ACC was slow and did a poor job this go around, but it was probably a wake up call to them. Not saying they are going to be okay, but the Big 12 still has to play defense and offense and I'm sure the ACC is rooting around the big 12 teams also to see if there are any cracks there.
 

HouClone

Well-Known Member
Sep 3, 2011
2,818
2,188
113
Houston
I think one interesting theory is the Power Conferences must have more than 50% of the FBS in order to control the football playoff scheme after 2026. As of 2024, there will be 134 FBS teams. To maintain control, the Power Conferences would need 68 teams.

This assumes no additional FCS schools are promoted to FBS. Supposedly there are at least five plains state schools at different levels of interest in FBS: North Dakota State, South Dakota State, Missouri State, Montana, and Montana State. New FBS teams may increase the number of teams needed in the Power Conferences to retain control of the playoffs.
I can see that % changing from 50% to 30%, driven from the Big 10, SEC with Fox and ESPN in the background. Who can stop them - the NCAA office?
 
  • Like
Reactions: GoldCy

HouClone

Well-Known Member
Sep 3, 2011
2,818
2,188
113
Houston
Everyone saying the ACC is for sure screwed is not hitting the pause button, because that is what realignment is hitting with the ACC GOR. If everyone thinks the ACC isn't going to learn from the PAC stupidity, they are fooling themselves. The ACC was slow and did a poor job this go around, but it was probably a wake up call to them. Not saying they are going to be okay, but the Big 12 still has to play defense and offense and I'm sure the ACC is rooting around the big 12 teams also to see if there are any cracks there.
Yep. Their fans are saying to poach the Big 12 when the Big 12 GOR is up. WVU, Cincy, UCF, TCU are the schools they talk most about poaching.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: aauummm

CoKane

Well-Known Member
Oct 26, 2013
18,197
11,886
113
Cedar Rapids
I think one interesting theory is the Power Conferences must have more than 50% of the FBS in order to control the football playoff scheme after 2026. As of 2024, there will be 134 FBS teams. To maintain control, the Power Conferences would need 68 teams.

This assumes no additional FCS schools are promoted to FBS. Supposedly there are at least five plains state schools at different levels of interest in FBS: North Dakota State, South Dakota State, Missouri State, Montana, and Montana State. New FBS teams may increase the number of teams needed in the Power Conferences to retain control of the playoffs.
Delaware also

And the entire WAC/ASUN merger. Tbh I dont think there's going to be an FCS, or at least a recognizable one, for much longer
 

FerShizzle

person slash genius
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Feb 5, 2013
16,060
19,983
113
Des Moines
I think there has to be a chance that the ACC survives. Maybe they get Notre Dame to join as a permanent member and try some form of unequal revenue distribution. Stanford joins as well.
Idk… I think allure of the SEC and Big 10 is going to be too much to keep 5-6 schools. And I am not sure ND wants to contractually bind itself to those teams that are left behind.

But you are right, ND could probably save that conference and cement the ACC in 3rd place if it wanted to.
 

heitclone

Well-Known Member
Jun 21, 2009
16,616
14,403
113
45
Way up there
Power 5 teams that will be relegated.
Stanford
Washington State
Oregon State
Cal
Wake Forest
BC
GT
Syracuse
I feel like Syracuse will get a shot if ESPN has anything to say about it. They seem like a school BY would really like too, especially paired with UConn.
 

CoKane

Well-Known Member
Oct 26, 2013
18,197
11,886
113
Cedar Rapids
I think one interesting theory is the Power Conferences must have more than 50% of the FBS in order to control the football playoff scheme after 2026. As of 2024, there will be 134 FBS teams. To maintain control, the Power Conferences would need 68 teams.

This assumes no additional FCS schools are promoted to FBS. Supposedly there are at least five plains state schools at different levels of interest in FBS: North Dakota State, South Dakota State, Missouri State, Montana, and Montana State. New FBS teams may increase the number of teams needed in the Power Conferences to retain control of the playoffs.
Where did you hear about that? Not sure that fits with current events but it is interesting.
I think there has to be a chance that the ACC survives. Maybe they get Notre Dame to join as a permanent member and try some form of unequal revenue distribution. Stanford joins as well.
I think there will be an ACC after they get hit with theirs. Too many teams, way more expansion options, and as far as I know the AAC and Sun Belt dont have as crazy of buyouts
 

heitclone

Well-Known Member
Jun 21, 2009
16,616
14,403
113
45
Way up there
I think there has to be a chance that the ACC survives. Maybe they get Notre Dame to join as a permanent member and try some form of unequal revenue distribution. Stanford joins as well.
They are stuck though, like PAC and big 12, expansion is their best option but like those two leagues, the big money schools aren't going to allow it.

It's best bet at surviving is to go through what those leagues did and then expand. If fsu, Clemson and UNC left, they conference could move on add the schools they're looking for. As long as they're stuck with those schools, they are screwed.

The ACC's fate will ultimately come down to whether or not they're united after the big ten and sec take what they want. Will they be united like the Big 12 or will it be 10 different agendas like the PAC.
 

contrarymary

may her colors ever fly
Apr 3, 2022
28
31
13
73
Las Cruces, NM
marmstrong82.wixsite.com
Has anyone posted about what effect this will have on the portal and recruiting? I mean, I think Missouri coach Eli Drinkwitz (yeah, yeah, I know) has a good point about the student-athletes. And before you comment that there won't be any student athletes in ten years, consider the interim. How will places like WVU, UCLA, USC, Oregon, and Washington retain athletes after they experience traveling across the country multiple times each year and then needing to attend class or take an exam? I'm thinking the Big 10 will soon lobby hard for restricting the portal to one transfer, but even that won't help these schools recruit and retain. I believe the student-athletes will have a greater impact than we think and I also agree with CW that the loss of regional rivalries along with limited media slots and $$ will cause another huge - perhaps even bigger - realignment in 5 - 7 years.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Cloneon

David Freshman1982

Well-Known Member
Sep 14, 2022
346
577
93
I feel like Syracuse will get a shot if ESPN has anything to say about it. They seem like a school BY would really like too, especially paired with UConn.
Yeah, no way Syracuse gets downgraded. They have good history with the football program, and obviously an outstanding BB history. I agree, they'd be a potential good get for the B12, perhaps paired with UConn, Pitt and Louisville. I know many on here don't like Louisville, but like Syracuse, they have excellent history with both their football and basketball programs.
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,628
65,916
113
LA LA Land
Heck, if the Pac-12 had taken the TV deal, we're probably Washington State and Oregon State right now, We got pretty lucky.

There’s a chance we could’ve got a similar deal even going second because our fan bases are actually engaged and we had expanded our market slightly. Not disagreeing with you in general but I do think the rampant apathy of half of the pac fanbases was really exposed in all of this, they only had 5-6 programs with a lot of fans who really care. Cal and Stanford getting left behind isn’t even a huge story in their own metro.
 

isucy86

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2006
9,129
7,731
113
Dubuque
I think one interesting theory is the Power Conferences must have more than 50% of the FBS in order to control the football playoff scheme after 2026. As of 2024, there will be 134 FBS teams. To maintain control, the Power Conferences would need 68 teams.

This assumes no additional FCS schools are promoted to FBS. Supposedly there are at least five plains state schools at different levels of interest in FBS: North Dakota State, South Dakota State, Missouri State, Montana, and Montana State. New FBS teams may increase the number of teams needed in the Power Conferences to retain control of the playoffs.
That might be what the current governance model stipulates. But I would be surprised if the Power conferences don't split off from G5 in the next couple years.

Just too much chatter by Power commissioners and coaches that we don't see a change. Sankey even alluded to it when discussing the CFP working group needing to address recent realignment.

Media & fans commonly use the vernacular Power 5. The NCAA documents actually use Autonomous 5. A little foreshadowing.
 

ljm4cy

Active Member
Apr 26, 2014
387
138
43
Where did you hear about that? Not sure that fits with current events but it is interesting.



I think it was on Greg Flugaur's show. Two of his frequent contributors are from Iowa and Ohio State. The Ohio State guy thinks its going to be three conferences of 24 as Power Conferences and everything will be in place in time for the 2026 playoffs. To me that is a lot of conjecture. Thus, an interesting theory.

One thing I think they have spot on is the playoff money starting this year will be divided based upon the number of teams and not the number of conferences. Thus, there is no more advantage of having 10 teams (like the Big 12 for years) versus 14 or 16 teams. This set-up is only for two years. Potentially, bigger changes will happen in 2026.
 

isucy86

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2006
9,129
7,731
113
Dubuque
Yeah, no way Syracuse gets downgraded. They have good history with the football program, and obviously an outstanding BB history. I agree, they'd be a potential good get for the B12, perhaps paired with UConn, Pitt and Louisville. I know many on here don't like Louisville, but like Syracuse, they have excellent history with both their football and basketball programs.
I believe in the end, the 3rd Conference (Big12/ACC) will have the most teams. The media rights threshold today ($31.7M) is about half the Big10 or SEC. So over the next decade I can see a lot of Big12 expansion: 24-28 teams.

But there are a couple existential threats beyond money driven realignment.
  1. The first being employee status for student athletes. Does this create a couple paths of student athletes: semi-pro vs. traditional.
  2. The second being the growing financial commitment to support a P4 football program. Do prestigious academic universities like Vanderbilt, Duke, Wake Forest, Boston College, Northwestern, Stanford, etc. drop or de-emphasize football like Chicago or Ivy League or Big East schools.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SolterraCyclone

SolterraCyclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2021
2,397
3,307
113
38
Yep. Their fans are saying to poach the Big 12 when the Big 12 GOR is up. WVU, Cincy, UCF, TCU are the schools they talk most about poaching.
I think the ACC just have too many teams with landing spots in the P2 to operate from a position of strength vs the Big 12. It’s going to be tough to poach WVU, Cincy, TCU when all you have is Boston College, Syracuse, Wake Forest, Louisville, Pitt and maybe Miami. Also if the ACC blows up hopefully we have a new TV deal after 2031. Having that in hand will be another advantage. Of course all that changes if Notre Dame joins the ACC.

Who knows what things will be like then, but it might be in our best interest to just merge at that point and use the strategy of strength in numbers
 
  • Like
Reactions: SEIOWA CLONE

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron