Sound like the first step of the power leagues breaking away from the NCAA.Ya, that sounds like a bad thing for us.
This is where I think its gets interesting. Will Georgia risk not getting their media contract or possibly not being able to play any p4 opponents. These commissioners do want every one to play by the same rules(Oklahoma's AD was practically begging for everyone to sign it in the article) and school administrators lobbying their state legislatures for every advantage possible prevents that. Whether this is legal in the first place will be interestingHuh. That's one way to get people to follow rules.
That said, the SEC really going to evict Georgia? The big 10 going to evict Ohio St? This would only have teeth for the middle or bottom of the conferences.
SEC and Big Ten sign first...
First? Try about 15th.Sound like the first step of the power leagues breaking away from the NCAA.
Oh boy, I’m with you as well but I’ll try.Gonna need someone to explain this to me like I am 5 and then tell me if it’s good or bad for the Big 12 and ISU.
The first step started some time ago.Sound like the first step of the power leagues breaking away from the NCAA.
So, what you are saying is it will be business as usual.Huh. That's one way to get people to follow rules.
That said, the SEC really going to evict Georgia? The big 10 going to evict Ohio St? This would only have teeth for the middle or bottom of the conferences.
Gonna need someone to explain this to me like I am 5 and then tell me if it’s good or bad for the Big 12 and ISU.
If it's middle or bottom, that implies middle to bottom. I make that point because a significant majority CAN control the behemoths because they'd leave the behemoths with not enough to play. At this stage I'm seeing the 'bluffs', or at the very least areas where 'bluffs' should be played.Huh. That's one way to get people to follow rules.
That said, the SEC really going to evict Georgia? The big 10 going to evict Ohio St? This would only have teeth for the middle or bottom of the conferences.
1) As presented, it’s a good thing. Levels the playing field for all schools to follow the same set of rules.
2) Not a lawyer, but I don’t think this would hold up under a challenge.
3) The market is undefeated, whether money is going over or under the table. This and the settlement will push a lot of it back under. Anything other than employing the players and collective bargaining is a half-measure designed to try to prolong the status quo.
It will end up a nothing-burger because it's not going to be enforceable and the big dogs are going to do their own thing regardless of what they say or anyone tells them too.Gonna need someone to explain this to me like I am 5 and then tell me if it’s good or bad for the Big 12 and ISU.