Power Conference schools being forced to sign a contract or risk membership

Clark

Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2009
18,290
4,497
113
Altoona
Huh. That's one way to get people to follow rules.

That said, the SEC really going to evict Georgia? The big 10 going to evict Ohio St? This would only have teeth for the middle or bottom of the conferences.
 

FerShizzle

code name: duchess
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Feb 5, 2013
15,590
19,425
113
Des Moines
Also, this seems like a great thing for the Iowa schools as I don’t see our state legislature going rogue in some attempt to game state laws for college sports to ISU or Iowa’s advantage. But SEC crazed states like Tennessee or Georgia or Alabama or Florida sure would. Maybe I am overestimating our state legislature.
 

CycloneT

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2017
386
615
93
Huh. That's one way to get people to follow rules.

That said, the SEC really going to evict Georgia? The big 10 going to evict Ohio St? This would only have teeth for the middle or bottom of the conferences.
This is where I think its gets interesting. Will Georgia risk not getting their media contract or possibly not being able to play any p4 opponents. These commissioners do want every one to play by the same rules(Oklahoma's AD was practically begging for everyone to sign it in the article) and school administrators lobbying their state legislatures for every advantage possible prevents that. Whether this is legal in the first place will be interesting
 

Big_Sill

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 4, 2008
1,582
2,405
113
43
Gonna need someone to explain this to me like I am 5 and then tell me if it’s good or bad for the Big 12 and ISU.
Oh boy, I’m with you as well but I’ll try.

Seems like this is attempting to say schools have to abide by the Deloitte clearinghouse decisions, even if those decisions would appear to violate state NIL laws.

Can you sign an agreement to not follow state law? Is that legal? Is that risky?

Wouldn’t this just open up getting sued by individual players?

I think it’s attempting to give the clearinghouse teeth, because it doesn’t really have any on its own.

I could by 100% wrong here… LOL

Good or bad for ISU? On its surface it would seem good. Anything that could actually regulate or minimize NIL would seem good for ISU as we are poor.

I say on the surface, because pretty much every major change in college sports is bad for ISU, as college football continues to scream towards a pro sports league for the haves.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ClubCy and ScottyP

intrepid27

Well-Known Member
Oct 9, 2006
5,988
5,058
113
Marion, IA
Huh. That's one way to get people to follow rules.

That said, the SEC really going to evict Georgia? The big 10 going to evict Ohio St? This would only have teeth for the middle or bottom of the conferences.
So, what you are saying is it will be business as usual.
 

Pat

Well-Known Member
Oct 20, 2011
2,385
3,504
113
Gonna need someone to explain this to me like I am 5 and then tell me if it’s good or bad for the Big 12 and ISU.

1) As presented, it’s a good thing. Levels the playing field for all schools to follow the same set of rules.

2) Not a lawyer, but I don’t think this would hold up under a challenge.

3) The market is undefeated, whether money is going over or under the table. This and the settlement will push a lot of it back under. Anything other than employing the players and collective bargaining is a half-measure designed to try to prolong the status quo.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: ClubCy and Big_Sill

Cloneon

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2015
2,959
3,070
113
West Virginia
Huh. That's one way to get people to follow rules.

That said, the SEC really going to evict Georgia? The big 10 going to evict Ohio St? This would only have teeth for the middle or bottom of the conferences.
If it's middle or bottom, that implies middle to bottom. I make that point because a significant majority CAN control the behemoths because they'd leave the behemoths with not enough to play. At this stage I'm seeing the 'bluffs', or at the very least areas where 'bluffs' should be played.
 

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,173
24,038
113
1) As presented, it’s a good thing. Levels the playing field for all schools to follow the same set of rules.

2) Not a lawyer, but I don’t think this would hold up under a challenge.

3) The market is undefeated, whether money is going over or under the table. This and the settlement will push a lot of it back under. Anything other than employing the players and collective bargaining is a half-measure designed to try to prolong the status quo.

Only way to get the under the table money reigned in is to have the IRS get involved. They have subpoena power and they can go after both parties. I just don’t see the political desire to get them involved unfortunately.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: isufbcurt

JM4CY

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 23, 2012
37,655
74,119
113
America
Gonna need someone to explain this to me like I am 5 and then tell me if it’s good or bad for the Big 12 and ISU.
It will end up a nothing-burger because it's not going to be enforceable and the big dogs are going to do their own thing regardless of what they say or anyone tells them too.
 

ScottyP

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jan 24, 2007
5,142
7,398
113
Urbandale, IA
College football is a complete mess right now. It really is the wild west right now. Nobody knows the "rules" right now, including coaches and administrators. Any possible "guardrails" that are attempted are un-enforceable. The amount of changes happening and the speed at which they change is crazy right now. Of course, most of this favors the "haves" and makes things more difficult for Iowa State right now. So far, Iowa State has managed to weather the storm pretty well, but there is so much uncertainty right now. We are less than four months away from the start of the football season and the coaches don't even know for sure how many players they can have on their roster.

Eventually this is all going to come crashing down. I'm pretty sure Iowa State is on the outside looking in, but nobody knows what it will look like. As a fan, I'm just riding things out until it gets to a breaking point for me (not sure when that will be).
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Tailg8er